Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Sheryl Crow tune, or is it auto-tune? Sounds Great So much gear, so little time! 111 21st December 2007 02:03 AM
Auto Tune 4 Help!!! tbar Work in progress / advice requested / Show & Tell / Artist showcase 0 31st January 2006 04:54 AM
auto tune rack vs. auto tune plug vs VoiceModeler * FormulaReed So much gear, so little time! 2 8th August 2005 01:49 AM
Auto Tune 4 on the way XHipHop So much gear, so little time! 7 19th April 2004 07:46 PM
auto tune Jason Poulin High end 7 18th September 2003 05:02 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 5th October 2006, 06:37 AM   #1
passenger
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 163
auto-tune 3 vs... auto-tune 4

any differences between the two? Can I get away with 3.... or do I NEED 4... I've worked with 4 before, and it worked well. Wil 3 be dissapointing?
passenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th October 2006, 11:20 PM   #2
uncle duncan
Lives for gear
 
uncle duncan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,933
4 is way better.
uncle duncan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th October 2006, 11:40 PM   #3
fastlane
Lives for gear
 
fastlane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: ireland
Posts: 553
I'm waiting to try out version 5, if it's a jumb over 4 I'll be buying it!!

Check it out

http://www.antarestech.com/products/...5preview.shtml
fastlane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th October 2006, 11:53 PM   #4
fastlane
Lives for gear
 
fastlane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: ireland
Posts: 553
just reading about it there.

The new snap to function is worth the money alone, that would save me hours on some sessions!!

And buy version 4 now and get the upgrade free!!! Good marketing!!
fastlane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th October 2006, 12:09 AM   #5
Kyle Ashley
Lives for gear
 
Kyle Ashley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tampa Bay/Cape Fear NC
Posts: 659
Does anyone know if the PC VST version requires iLok?
__________________
Kyle Ashley
Kyle Ashley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th October 2006, 04:19 AM   #6
TanTan
Lives for gear
 
TanTan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Israel
Posts: 712
4 is more transparent, less obvious "cher" effect, it's more like nothing is there
TanTan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 6th October 2006, 08:53 AM   #7
aussie_techie
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 2,020
5 looks way better
aussie_techie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th October 2006, 10:44 AM   #8
fastlane
Lives for gear
 
fastlane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: ireland
Posts: 553
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle Ashley View Post
Does anyone know if the PC VST version requires iLok?

It looks that way. What harm??
fastlane is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0