What is bettter the D-BOX DAC or the AVID 16x16 HD I/O DAC?
Old 8th May 2013
  #1
Gear nut
 

Thread Starter
What is bettter the D-BOX DAC or the AVID 16x16 HD I/O DAC?

I usually use AES/EBU I/O to connect my AVID 16x16 I/O to my d-box allowing me to use the Digital to analog converter on the d-box. However there is an option on the d-box to use analog outputs. So I hook the XLR cables up in the right places, and I listened to the difference. I just can't get a grip on it. Is the AVID 16x16 I/O (you know the $5,000 one) DAC better OR is the D-BOX DAC better? Or is this as the worn out cliche goes "splitting hairs?"

Furthermore can the human ear even tell the difference? I first thought after switching to the AVID DAC that it was better then I went back to the D-BOX DAC and thought well actually THIS is better. Now I'm so confused I don't know what to think. HELP!

thanks
Old 8th May 2013
  #2
Lives for gear
 
IamJohnGalt's Avatar
 

Yes.

Sent from my SCH-I535
Old 8th May 2013
  #3
Gear nut
 

Thread Starter
sorry you're response is a little vague. what do you mean yes? please elaborate.
Old 8th May 2013
  #4
Lives for gear
 
IamJohnGalt's Avatar
 

What I mean is that they both have really nice DA conversion and you should let your ears decide which is better. I have my UA Apollo hooked up via SPDIF and Analog so I can go back and forth if I wanted (among other reasons). You have the ability to use either box for conversion and which is the better one is a subjective evaluation.

You say you don't know what to think....so don't think. Listen instead. Which one sounds better and enables you:

!. to make better mix decisions
2. to enjoy your music more.

That is really all that matter right? Good luck.
Old 8th May 2013
  #5
Lives for gear
 
BradLyons's Avatar
 

I would do an A/B yourself and see what you think. As to the differences the converter on the DBOX is good and for some can be a better solution than their own interface. But if you're using the AVID HD boxes, those are meant to be premium converters and would be your better choice. The converter in the DBOX isn't an afterthought by any means, but it's not the primary or even secondary design goal. But again connect them both and decide for yourself :-)
Old 6th June 2013
  #6
Lives for gear
 
chrisdee's Avatar
Maby the fact that you can't decide wich is better says that there isn't a big noticable difference?

Also I have the Omni and I'm thinking about getting a D-Box just to get another headphones out for tracking purposes.

I use direct monitoring for tracking. Do you know if this is possible via the D-Box or does that work only on the Omni ?
Old 6th June 2013
  #7
Lives for gear
 

Chrisdee,

Whichever method you use will not have any bearing on the Dbox.

As long as when you are tracking, you have the SUM output pressed, the Dbox will not add any latency, because it's still staying analog. So whatever small amount of latency you have from the Omni (or not) will not change.

It only adds latency when you are monitoring the final mix after you have taken the Sum output back into the Omni for your final mixdown, and are coming back into the Dbox for monitoring (with the DAW button if you are using the Dbox converter, or the Analog button if you are using the Omni converters).

Because in this case, an extra step of A/D and D/A conversion is happening.
Topic:
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Forum Jump
 
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.