UAD 1176/LA2A vs The authentic hardware - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!


UAD 1176/LA2A vs The authentic hardware

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 24th August 2006   #1
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Wally World, AR
Posts: 523

Thread Starter
UAD 1176/LA2A vs The authentic hardware

I'm hoping someone has access or links to audio clips available of the software models compared to the authentic hardware. Anyone?

If need be, i'll demo the hardware and assess the results myself.
GL Respect Due is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th August 2006   #2
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 1,289

The software is not even close the hardware in the UA line.


Nick
Aearth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th August 2006   #3
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 555

How about the original hardware vs. the reissue pieces of hardware of both 1176 and LA2A, and LA3A & 1178? Anybody got opinions comparing those? Not to derail your thread, just add to it, if anyone is interested...
digibird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th August 2006   #4
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Wally World, AR
Posts: 523

Thread Starter
Nick:

I'm an analog cat with a small assortment of high end outboard. I'm simply looking for comparison audio clips for wonderment more then anything. I don't happen to have an LA2A, 1176, or UAD card (One of my good friends has a UAD - which is where i'd take the hardware for comparisons).
GL Respect Due is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th August 2006   #5
Lives for gear
 
jeronimo's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 3,228

Send a message via ICQ to jeronimo Send a message via AIM to jeronimo
I had a stereo 1176 version from Universal Audio with me and while mixing a record I used both the analog going D/A/D into pt and the BF 1176 version... and I must say the difference wasn´t night and day, BUT the hardware had a more "round" sound with a little dip on the high end...
I liked both a lot
__________________
Think Diferente!
http://www.jeracravo.com
jeronimo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th August 2006   #6
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 1,289

I have the UA 2-1176 hardware and the UA 1176LN TDM plugin. The hardware works for me, the plugin is OK (a bit squishy sounding)and some of the guys using the UA PCI card say that the Uad card is better.
But really you have to consider the cost of the hardware compared to the software and sound quality that you want.


Nick
Aearth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th August 2006   #7
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 1,289

Quote:
Originally Posted by GL Respect Due View Post
Nick:

I'm an analog cat with a small assortment of high end outboard. I'm simply looking for comparison audio clips for wonderment more then anything. I don't happen to have an LA2A, 1176, or UAD card (One of my good friends has a UAD - which is where i'd take the hardware for comparisons).

I don't really have anything to AB as far as listening. I use plugins for stuff that is not so important in a mix and hardware for those that matter.
EG: main vox always hadware, BV 's plugin (compressors)

Gee UA 2-1176 not day and night against a BF plugin?????????????
The day in blinding and the night is black as.

Nick
Aearth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th August 2006   #8
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Wally World, AR
Posts: 523

Thread Starter
Aearth:

I appreciate your opinion. I have to have hardware for tracking, as I can't track with a plug-in in the traditional sense. Though I don't use any plugins at this point, I feel like you do. For minor corrective work, and/or less
important elements, I could see how having the UAD plugs could be useful (in your case choice TDM plugs). My original question stems from the the wonderment of just how good these "secondary" processers could be. Almost equivalant? Not even close? You see where i'm going with this.
GL Respect Due is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th August 2006   #9
Gear Guru
 
u b k's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: The Land of Sunshine
Posts: 11,295

the difference isn't so much in the sound --- which is appreciable but also in many ways negligible --- but in how the resulting sounds behave. the hardware tracks just go where they're supposed to with minimal fuss and muss. the plug-in tracks need to be sweet-talked into doing their part.

it can be done with the plugs, i do it all the time, but it's not nearly as fun. and it doesn't sound as good, especially in the context of the mix.


gregoire
del
ubk
.
__________________

Tapey Compressor | Silky Air EQ | Vibey Plugin Squeezebox...

......

Kush Audio: High End Just Got Higher

____________________
u b k is online now   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vocals: LA2A -> 1176 or 1176-> LA2A Sunshy High end 20 14th June 2011 09:43 AM
LA2A, 2-1176 or Distressor? Help me pick. Sunshy High end 28 23rd January 2007 08:00 AM
best revisions for 1176, la2a/3a aetucker1 High end 5 15th January 2007 06:45 PM
LA2A and 1176 bandwidth!! FROGGY So much gear, so little time! 0 11th September 2004 11:55 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:31 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.