Login / Register
 
Tascam FW-1884 vs. MOTU 896HD
New Reply
Subscribe
DaveJes1979
Thread Starter
#1
31st October 2003
Old 31st October 2003
  #1
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Camarillo, CA
Posts: 396

Thread Starter
DaveJes1979 is offline
Tascam FW-1884 vs. MOTU 896HD

It comes down to two middle-weight champions, folks. After doing my "homework", these are the contenders I've narrowed down my DAW backbone choices to.

Both have a street price of around $1300.

I'm recording prog rock and need at least 8 channels for the drums. Which one should I get?

Ding. Ding.

Yes, the Tascam is nice because of motorized faders. That's good - but I'm more concerned about sound quality. Do the pres and converters hold up against or beat MOTUs? All I know is that the Tascam pres are supposed to be Tascam's best line - nicer than the DM-24s. Yes, MOTU can run at 192khz, which might be nice when there is enough software that runs it (Cubase SX won't, neither do most plug-ins). But are the converters better at ANY sampling rate than Tascams?

BOTH units have ??? reputations for PC compatibility. Hmmmm...

I hope you all will add some semi-educated fuel to the fire - or perhaps some perfectly ignorant opinions , and maybe even a few people who have had some hands-on with either of these boxes.

Thanks.
#2
31st October 2003
Old 31st October 2003
  #2
Lives for gear
 
Albert's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,483

Albert is offline
The Tascam is a recently released product, and it will take them a while to sort out the various bugs and issues. Do a search on the net. It took about a year and a half of OS updates to get their DM-24 mixer up to speed.

If it was me I'd go for the MOTU, but you really are comparing two different kinds of products.
__________________
http://www.misterpotts.com
[URL=http://www.facebook.com/alby.potts[/URL]
#3
1st November 2003
Old 1st November 2003
  #3
Gear addict
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 444

edmann is offline
I have heard several times that the FW 1884 AD/DA sounds Really Great, most likely because it has an analog front end built (by or with) Frontier Designs (People seem to love their "Tango" box)

I recently had a MOTU 896 version 1. It was OK with mics (with or w/o external pres) - but for recording feeds from a mixer (synths) at 48k - 44.1k - it sounded not very good at all. Reportedly this is due to gain staging - even though the 896 has +4 and -10 selector switches. So I would say the 896 is a very specialized box = mics only if you want the best it has to offer. I was much happier with the results from my old 2408 mkII for line level feeds. Look at the RME stuff too - reportedly a significant step up from the MOTU sound. Motu's greatest strength (imo) is its stability and wealth of features for the price. The RME stuff too is quite stable too although if you are running DP - use MOTU stuff.

good luck in your search

Ed
New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn  Submit Thread to Google+ Google+ 
 
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter / Forum
Replies
xtranscendedx / Low End Theory
42
Spintonik / So much gear, so little time!
1
Texas / Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production
2
elninojesus / Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording
8
Syki / So much gear, so little time!
11

Forum Jump

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.