Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
They wouldn't let me hear them! Jax Mastering forum 17 20th May 2006 09:01 PM
Let's Hear Something Lawrence Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 3 7th August 2005 02:40 PM
Hear ye.... alnico Work in progress / advice requested / Show & Tell / Artist showcase 4 20th March 2005 12:10 AM
OT, you just have to hear this slobbermonster So much gear, so little time! 1 17th December 2004 02:35 AM
Hear Technologies "Hear Back" system opinions anyone? jho So much gear, so little time! 10 25th February 2004 07:43 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 25th July 2006, 02:34 PM   #1
JulianBrightnes
Gear addict
 
JulianBrightnes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Amsterdam, NL
Posts: 355
I don't hear it!!!! you?

Hey slutz,

Just noticed this dither-question thread the other day: "which dithering was the best?"
To be quite honest: I don't hear any friggin' difference between POWR, IDR or none at all!
Here's what I did: there's a music clip I bounced down from 24bit/48K (sorry, I'm in broadcast mainly) to 16 bit/48K, one time using POWR, once using IDR (both type 1 noise shaping) and once using nothing at all.
I don't hear any difference, they even cancel out with one another. Can you guys tell which one is which? I know the theory behind it... but hear it ??

Cheers, Julian
Attached Files
File Type: zip dithertest.zip (4.73 MB, 12 views)
JulianBrightnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2006, 03:44 PM   #2
PoorGlory
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,250
I haven't listened to that particular test (at work right now) but I have played around with different dithers, different dither types and noise shaping types.. They all sound a little different, enough to make you want to choose one over the other after A/B'ing them. However, I guarantee you no one ever listened to an album and went "Gee, I wish they used IDR Type 1 dither with the Ultra noise shaping". Its extremely subtle, and most people won't give a shit.
PoorGlory is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2006, 07:00 PM   #3
Ethan Winer
Lives for gear
 
Ethan Winer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 4,776
Lightbulb

Julian,

> I don't hear any friggin' difference <

Neither do I. I'm convinced it's a case of the Emperor's new clothes. If you think about it, all the action happens more than 80 dB below the signal level. How could something that soft possibly make a difference with typical pop music pounding away 80 to 90 dB louder?

I'm sure people do hear a difference, but I suspect the difference they hear is due to something else. For example, if you move your head even an inch or two, the frequency response changes due to the different arrival times from each speaker. You can prove this easily by measuring the frequency response at the listening position, then moving the measuring mike an inch or two and measuring again.

Reflections off nearby surfaces also skew the response slightly over very small distances. I'm pretty sure that is the main reason people report hearing a change, regardless of what they thought they were comparing.

--Ethan
Ethan Winer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2006, 07:25 PM   #4
mogWai
Lives for gear
 
mogWai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 729
Send a message via MSN to mogWai
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ethan Winer
J
I'm sure people do hear a difference, but I suspect the difference they hear is due to something else. For example, if you move your head even an inch or two, the frequency response changes due to the different arrival times from each speaker.
Great. Every single blind test rendered obsolete.
__________________
"NUKEM! Get them before they get you.]
mogWai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2006, 07:26 PM   #5
severe
Lives for gear
 
severe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 1,150
Yea...my iPod's not picking up any of this "friggin' difference".
__________________
"Some of you people just plain don't know s---. No offense." -theblue1
"Tell us if it looks like it will sound good." -RKrizman
"The many truths we cling to depend greatly on our point of view." -Obi-Wan Kenobi
severe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2006, 07:29 PM   #6
Sizzleboy
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 921
Quote:
Originally Posted by JulianBrightnes
Hey slutz,

Just noticed this dither-question thread the other day: "which dithering was the best?"
To be quite honest: I don't hear any friggin' difference between POWR, IDR or none at all!
Here's what I did: there's a music clip I bounced down from 24bit/48K (sorry, I'm in broadcast mainly) to 16 bit/48K, one time using POWR, once using IDR (both type 1 noise shaping) and once using nothing at all.
I don't hear any difference, they even cancel out with one another. Can you guys tell which one is which? I know the theory behind it... but hear it ??

Cheers, Julian
The only time you will hear the difference is at extremely low levels. These levels are usually only reached during fade outs of audio and reverb. 99% of the time, the dithering noise is well below the audio signal level. Technically, the best dithering noise would be that which is the quietest and most unobtrusive, yet masks the stepping of volume levels that occours at very low levels.

If you really want to here what a particular shape of dithering noise sounds like, check them out at 8 bits.

You could also reduce a file's signal to about -85dB, apply the dithering, then normalise the file back to 0dB.
Sizzleboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2006, 06:27 PM   #7
Ethan Winer
Lives for gear
 
Ethan Winer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 4,776
Lightbulb

> Great. Every single blind test rendered obsolete. <

ROF,L. That was the farthest thing from my mind when I wrote that. Indeed, this is exactly why proper blind testing is so useful. A valid test will switch back and forth repeatedly, and attempt to find a trend across multiple tests. That way, the small changes I mentioned, mostly due to comb filtering, will be averaged out.

--Ethan
Ethan Winer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2006, 07:46 PM   #8
RainbowStorm
Lives for gear
 
RainbowStorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,328
I have tested different POW-r, Waves L2 and other dithering algorithms and I had a hard time hearing any difference at first, especially when applying different settings on the same dithering algorithm and comparing different POW-r versions. I don't think I would be able to notice any difference between these, at least not with my Mackies... I noticed a difference when comparing on heavy digital mixes, especially between the POW-r and the Waves L2/L3 on Type 1 Ultra. I used Mackie HR824 monitors. However, I have to add that according to a medical test of my hearing my doctor told me my hearing is unrarely good (which I'm very thankful for), so that might play a critical role. I have had sound over sensitivity but it's getting better. I developed over sensitivity during a period of half a year with sound quality testing going to the extreme. These tests included dithering. When I heard the Waves L2 Type 1 Ultra I was blown away. The sound went slightly more detailed and full, like it was getting heavier in weight without getting muddy and thick. It felt less jittery. I would say that the overall dynamic range of the mix increased with something like 0,2 - 0,4 dB, at least that is how I best describe the difference, like when comparing two different cables of different quality and length.

Even if you can't hear any difference I strongly recommend that you go with the Waves L2/Waves L3 set to Type 1 Ultra. I asked Bob Katz what he thinks about the quality of the this dithering effect and he also thinks it's good. I guess if you ask other professionals as well you'll find some credible comments about the high quality of the Waves L2/L3 dithering algorithm. Also check out the blind testing of different dithering algorithms at http://www.24-96.net/dither/results.htm . I have not heard the MegaBitMax Ultra, so I cannot comment on it.
__________________
- A member of the "Homo sapien audiophilus" family
RainbowStorm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2006, 02:52 PM   #9
JulianBrightnes
Gear addict
 
JulianBrightnes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Amsterdam, NL
Posts: 355
Thanks for the replies, everyone. I'll just keep on dithereing as I always did anyway (better safe than sorry)... I got the hardware L2 set top IDR type one now!

Cheers, Julian
JulianBrightnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2006, 03:05 PM   #10
Jules
Gearslutz.com admin
 
Jules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 11,693
Sometimes I just toggle through the available different flavors of dither.. and convince myself that one perhaps, just perhaps sounds better suited than the other.. Can you do more than that?

If you were dealing with classical music and long piano decay notes, then I would fully belive folks involved in that field do hear a difference and have a right to be fussy about it.. But as for us pop n rock n rap rock n rollers?... Naaaaaaahhhhh. not really... Mastering engineers probably have a keen ear for this stuff..
__________________
Jules


"your requirements are arbitrarily mandating a non-native solution" - Peeder
Jules is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0