Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Portico 5016 dual channel Mic Pre/DI with vari-phase and 5014 Stereo Field Editor narco New product alert! 3 6th September 2006 07:53 AM
Pulling up Pro Tools dual mono (stereo...) in Cubase SX 3 - make them stereo? Paulseta Music computers 5 24th July 2006 12:43 PM
Stereo Field question... BeatNick Mastering forum 6 20th March 2006 02:06 AM
414XLII or KSM44 for stereo recordings? (mainly choirs) villeman Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 14 11th May 2005 07:10 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 23rd July 2006, 01:55 PM   #1
TEMAS
Lives for gear
 
TEMAS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London
Posts: 1,212
Placing stereo recordings into a stereo field / mix

Sometimes when I record an instrument in stereo (e.g. guitar), I am using the left mic to capture the neck and the right to get the finger picks and body.

Then when I come to mixing the song and placing the recording into a stereo field, I'm left with a dilema.

Do I, a) decrease the level of one side of the recording? (which means I loose lots of the detail of that side).

Or, b) pan one side of the recording over / ontop of the other? (which could create phasing).
TEMAS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2006, 02:02 PM   #2
Renaud Charlier
Gear Head
 
Renaud Charlier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brussels
Posts: 61
Why not dare to pan the 2 tracks full left and full right? Just did it with an M149 on body and KM184 on player's left hand and it's the biggest sound i ever had...
__________________
Renaud

renaud@musicom.be
www.musicom.be
Renaud Charlier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2006, 02:08 PM   #3
AlexLakis
Lives for gear
 
AlexLakis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD/L.A.
Posts: 3,612
Why would you feel the need to do either? Why wouldn't you?

It all depends on the mix! What does the song call for?

There are no correct answer to your questions. Only after hearing the song can you make a judgement call as to where to pan and what levels you need to operate at.

When using two mics like you are with acoustic guitar, sometimes I'll hard pan the tracks. Other times, I'll pan them both to the same position, and raise/lower volumes of each till I like what I hear tone-wise (this is basically in place of using EQ...more high end = string mic, more low end = sound hole mic.) It alllllll depeeeeends...
AlexLakis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2006, 02:58 PM   #4
TEMAS
Lives for gear
 
TEMAS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London
Posts: 1,212
Cheers for the insight.

Do you ever get any phasing issues when layering the two sides over the top of each other?

I would've thought I would in some situations, (e.g. with a group of backing singers recorded in stereo) if the two sides were quite similar. But I guess if there are similar then there's no harm in using option 'a' instead of 'b' to place them into a stereo field.

Thanks again.
TEMAS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2006, 03:16 PM   #5
AlexLakis
Lives for gear
 
AlexLakis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD/L.A.
Posts: 3,612
I haven't been getting too many phasing issues recently. If you're close micing seperate parts of the guitar, it shouldn't be too much of an issue. I try to visualize what the mic will be picking up, and try to give each particular mic "it's own space." If there are phasing problems, I try to fix them when I'm setting up the mics, not in the mix. Before you hit record, pan them both center and see if anything dissapears. Sometimes, a little phasing can be cool! If it sounds good, then it sounds good! If you found you've painted yourself into a corner with some bad phasing while recording group vocals or whatever using multiple mics, try adding a little delay to one of the tracks to clear things up. I sometimes do this anyway to get a "bigger" (wider) sound and more of a stereo spread. Or, you could try running each individual track through a different processor to change the sonics a little.
AlexLakis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2006, 07:01 PM   #6
gwailoh
Gear maniac
 
gwailoh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 295
I seem to have trouble fairly often with phase with spaced pairs on acoustic guitar. Must be that my technique stinks, but after a good deal of experimentation I still struggle to get a tolerable mono sound with spaced pairs. Having better results with M/S, but I must say that after hearing the source in stereo, mono is so generally uninspiring that it's difficult to evaluate the mono result objectively.
__________________
Mark Phillips
I'm not old, I'm "vintage".
http://www.markphillips.com
http://www.smartmonsters.com
gwailoh is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0