Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MEGA MIC SHOOTOUT Mic List Revealed True North High end 21 14th January 2006 08:56 PM
Mic Shootout ????????? SoZo High end 3 7th January 2006 06:02 AM
New Cheap Mic shootout toolskid Work in progress / advice requested / Show & Tell / Artist showcase 20 14th August 2004 01:38 PM
Mic pre shootout! Roland High end 1 7th December 2002 03:43 AM

View Poll Results: which one you like huh? huh?
mic 1 6 16.22%
mic 2 16 43.24%
mic 3 1 2.70%
mic 4 2 5.41%
mic 5 8 21.62%
mic 6 (next post below) 4 10.81%
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 18th July 2006, 06:00 PM   #1
sheltersoton
Gear addict
 
sheltersoton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Southampton
Posts: 394
snare mic shootout ... kinda

ok before we bigin a disclaimer:

i know overheads, room mics etc make up a huge part of the "snare sound" however, i just bought an I5 cheap on ebay so tracked some snare hits through it and 5 of its peers to see which mic gave the "nicest" snare sound straight out of the box..

ok details:

snare = Mapex Black Panther 14x6.5 brass with somewhat worn ambassador coated head. It wasn't in any well tuned state its just as is with 1/2 a moon gel next to the rim.

signal chain = snare > Mic > OSA MP1L > Motu 24/io @ 44.1/24 then normalised and mixed out at 44.1/16 wav

the mic capsule was the same distance each time and pointed dead at the centre (4inches)

the mics: The Audix I5
Shure SM57
Shure SM57 w/o xformer
Beyer M201N
Senheiser Md421
Shure SM7 (eq flat)

so which one sounds the "nicest"
poll away
Attached Files
File Type: wav mic 1.wav (1.41 MB, 443 views)
File Type: wav mic 2.wav (1.08 MB, 545 views)
File Type: wav mic 3.wav (1.08 MB, 319 views)
File Type: wav mic 4.wav (1,004.5 KB, 490 views)
File Type: wav mic 5.wav (1,004.5 KB, 478 views)
sheltersoton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2006, 06:02 PM   #2
sheltersoton
Gear addict
 
sheltersoton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Southampton
Posts: 394
heres wav.6

cheers!!
Attached Files
File Type: wav mic 6.wav (1.06 MB, 262 views)
sheltersoton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2006, 07:20 PM   #3
Lyle Caldwell
Gear Head
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 65
Just based on that, I would give the nod to Mics 2 and 5, though which one would work best in context, and how much hat bleeds in would be huge factors.

I've done similar comparisons, and using the same position for each mic, while seemingly fair practice, can lead to really great mics sounding kinda bad. If each mic is positioned so that it sounds its individual best, the results can be dramatically different.
__________________
-Lyle Caldwell

psionicaudio.com
Lyle Caldwell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2006, 07:32 PM   #4
sheltersoton
Gear addict
 
sheltersoton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Southampton
Posts: 394
hey, yeah thats all true, this was only really as a general test to hear the individual "sound" of each mic in the same situation... i actually forgot which mic was which on the lst when i voted, went back and checked which one i had voted for and was suprised (not shocked, su[prised!)

cheers
sheltersoton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2006, 09:06 PM   #5
I-Quality
Gear Head
 
I-Quality's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Helvetia
Posts: 52
it's really dificult to say as the hits are so unconsistent...so I guess i'm more voting for the best hits (:
seems as no2 and 5 are the airiest and with most top end...as this is what I'm allways adding a lot i'd chose these....
no3 is so "closed", maybe too much proximity effect..
__________________
Crevardcore makes the law
I-Quality is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2006, 10:07 PM   #6
John Peacock
Gear maniac
 
John Peacock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 172
Quote:
Originally Posted by I-Quality
it's really dificult to say as the hits are so unconsistent...
Uh-huh.

I like the last hit on number 4... Six and one have something that I king of like. But clearly these mics are sort of scooping out some "konk" on the drum. And I don't like "konk." But if the drum was tuned differently, I might like the others better. I guess the other angle would be that 2, 3 and 5 are accentuating the konk. In which case I am guessing 2, 3 and 5 are 57's.

-Jp
John Peacock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2006, 10:10 PM   #7
sheltersoton
Gear addict
 
sheltersoton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Southampton
Posts: 394
re hits: i tried to get a decent sweet spot hit, a rim, a rim shot on each one ... sorry if theyre a bit lame ;)
sheltersoton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2006, 10:27 PM   #8
Rob King
Lives for gear
 
Rob King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sherman Oaks
Posts: 754
I liked 2 & 6. Nice overall tone to those. Am I the only one that hates mic 5?
__________________
Rob King
Green Street Studios
http://www.greenstreetstudios.com
http://www.myspace.com/greenstreetstudios
Rob King is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2006, 11:25 PM   #9
waffle waitress
Lives for gear
 
waffle waitress's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Austin
Posts: 547
Cool test. I like the 421 but I think it's the way it was hit...maybe it would be a more solid test if you set up all the mics at the same time so the hits would not vary at all. #3 sounds really dark but I think the hits were softer on that one.
waffle waitress is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2006, 11:39 PM   #10
Chris Parsons
Lives for gear
 
Chris Parsons's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 635
Send a message via AIM to Chris Parsons
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob King
Am I the only one that hates mic 5?
nope
__________________
******A proud user of 44.1/24******
http://www.pineforeststudio.com
Chris Parsons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2006, 11:49 PM   #11
sheltersoton
Gear addict
 
sheltersoton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Southampton
Posts: 394
which one is the 421 ??
sheltersoton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2006, 12:19 AM   #12
Alexi
Lives for gear
 
Alexi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 1,064
first of all, thank you sheltersoton for putting this poll ogether, i love threads like this.


my favourite would prolly' be mic 1 and 2 but i find it really hard to judge the mics when i don't hear them together with the other mics on the kit..........you know what i mean?

The mic i dislike the most might sound really great in context with the others....



so which is which?






cheers
__________________
Vintage 19th and 20th century physics is fun!

Karl
Alexi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th July 2006, 09:26 AM   #13
sheltersoton
Gear addict
 
sheltersoton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Southampton
Posts: 394
ok this seems to have dies a death

when i get to the studio ill list which is which

neil
sheltersoton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th July 2006, 03:13 PM   #14
sheltersoton
Gear addict
 
sheltersoton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Southampton
Posts: 394
ok

mic 1: Audix I5
Mic 2: beyer M201n
Mic 3: Dhure SM7
Mic 4: Shure SM57
Mic 5: Senn MD421
Mic 5: Shure SM57 xformless

interesting to any one?

cheers guys!
sheltersoton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th July 2006, 03:31 PM   #15
Lyle Caldwell
Gear Head
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 65
Out of curiousity, what was the high pass filter on the 421 set to?
__________________
-Lyle Caldwell

psionicaudio.com
Lyle Caldwell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th July 2006, 03:48 PM   #16
Aerophone
Gear Head
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 36
Yup... 421 rules.
Aerophone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th July 2006, 04:00 PM   #17
OVERNIGHT
Gear addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 319
No 441? My personal favorite.
__________________
For hand puppets, fisting is a life force.
OVERNIGHT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th July 2006, 04:02 PM   #18
chetatkinsdiet
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,473
2 & 5 are typically what I look for out of a close snare mic. Although, I'd have that drummer take another pass and get some consistent hits.
The other mics might work well depending on what OH situation you're using and about a zillion other factors.

later,
m
chetatkinsdiet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th July 2006, 04:13 PM   #19
AdamJay
Lives for gear
 
AdamJay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,368
nice. the two mics i liked the most turn out to be the only 2 i ever use on snare.

Beyer M201 and SM57

that transformerless 57 sounds good too.
AdamJay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th July 2006, 05:44 PM   #20
sheltersoton
Gear addict
 
sheltersoton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Southampton
Posts: 394
yeah yeah alright i hit like a monkey and am as consistant as my local football team!!

no 441 as a ican t afford one at mo, but i have just sourced a senn 509 blackfire and a Heil pr-40 so maybe ill do another one with some condensors too

im doing my bands album this month so we'll prob get a set up with the overheads we're going to use (aea r-88) and then track the same beat (with my drummer who is WAY better than me ) swapping snare and kick mics to see which ones we like best... the only difference being that i will look for the sweep spot for each mic... so if you all fancy ill post the responses!

btw if any one wants to loan me a 441
sheltersoton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th July 2006, 08:50 PM   #21
ben_allison
Gear maniac
 
ben_allison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 261
2 won for me overall, with 3 just slightly behind. I loved 5, and would fit well in a sing where a tighter crack was desired.

4 sounded pretty dead...not horrible really, but the worst of the lot for me.

1 and six were fairly similar. They'd probably work in a lesser energy track, where not as much snap was needed.

ADDENDUM:

I've just read the key. Seems like the i5 and the transformerless 57 are really close! Interesting...

Look's like I'll be needing 2 SM7's now (for kick and snare)!
ben_allison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th August 2006, 10:43 PM   #22
Elof
Gear nut
 
Elof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sweden
Posts: 133
No 2 for me, I ordered one today. I donīt like no 5 at all...
Elof is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th August 2006, 11:01 PM   #23
brad347
Gear Head
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 38
interesting that the only one I really hated turned out to be the stock 57. Popular mic for snare (goes without saying) but I've never gotten along with it. I guess it's just a personal preference.
brad347 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th August 2006, 09:26 AM   #24
TheSweetener
Lives for gear
 
TheSweetener's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Germany / Frankfurt
Posts: 969
Yes, I was also shocked how honky the SM57 sounds.

My favourites are the Audix and the SM7.
The Audix D1 is another great snare mic by the way, but I'll definately check out the I5!
Thanks for this poll!
TheSweetener is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 28th August 2006, 08:33 PM   #25
SMC Productions
Gear maniac
 
SMC Productions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SabbathTown
Posts: 153
Send a message via Yahoo to SMC Productions
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSweetener View Post
Yes, I was also shocked how honky the SM57 sounds.

Thanks for this poll!
They have always sounded 'honky' to me, without lots of EQ, exact placement, premium Pre, etc.

Never cared for them.
__________________

Calcitra Clunis



"Pushing Beyond The Limits"
SMC Productions is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2006, 01:40 AM   #26
joachime
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sweden, EU
Posts: 4
I prefered no. 2, 3 and 5 (in that order). Interesting shootout, especially since I own 3 of the mics! But it would be interesting to compare these with a Shure 545 or any similar unidirectional dynamic microphone!

Last edited by joachime; 30th November 2006 at 09:52 AM.. Reason: ...
joachime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2006, 03:38 PM   #27
keithfreund
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 24
I liked 2 best. Didn't like 4 or 5.
keithfreund is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2006, 07:10 PM   #28
Mr Skills
Gear Head
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 40
Is an M201n the same sonically as an M201 or M201TG?
.

.
Mr Skills is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0