![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Control Surface | Circuitt | High end | 24 | 25th January 2007 07:01 PM |
| Control Surface for Digital Performer? | EveningSky | Music computers | 6 | 6th August 2006 03:14 PM |
| Digital /analog mixer/control surface-logic exist? | gsilbers | Music computers | 2 | 15th June 2006 09:37 AM |
| control surface | halfguard | Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production | 17 | 3rd January 2006 12:37 AM |
| Which control surface do you like? | Zep Dude | So much gear, so little time! | 22 | 21st December 2003 10:00 PM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear Head Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 64
| Control Surface vs. Digital Mixer for PTHD I am looking to get some faders for my PTHD system but not something as big as a Control 24. I don't need a monitor section, so the Command 8 is essentially a couple faders and knobs for $1150. A digital mixer like the o1v96 would give me double the amount of faders for $2200 and every other feature of the mixer would just be a bonus. even if i never touched the pre's or mixing features, just a synth/sampler submixer would be worth it. If the o1v96 interfaces seamlessly with ProTools (as they advertise) this is a far better value. Anyone? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Moderator Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Belgium
Posts: 3,619
| Yes, 01V96 would give more faders, but far less integration as a Command8 The 01v96 control is basically HUI. When using PTHD, I wouldn't split it up into PT and digital mixer, keep it all in one. Command8 will suit you fine.
__________________ Mathijs Indesteege aka Mathew Lane mixing - mastering - audio restoration - plugins http://www.mathewlane.com DrMS. Focus on your stereo field. DrMS spatial processor RTAS/AU/VST plugin » Digital Audio Product Support Joystick Audio - Benelux High End Distributor http://www.joystick.be |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 79
| The O1v will only give you 8 faders at a time, not all 16 at once. A command 8 would probably be best It has functions for comtrolling plugins and many other proTools parameters as well as fades and mutes. |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Gear addict Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: PDX
Posts: 480
| Quote:
If it were me, and I were looking for that kind of thing, I would simply grab something like a Mackie 16 channel mixer, rack mount it for the submixes, and use a dedicated control surface. Switching between HUI functionality and digital mixer finction for the submix and such would get on my nerves pretty quickly. And I personally did not care for the "learning curve" to adapt to using a non-dedicated surface for PT...and I thought control surfaces at that level of simplicity were supposed to be pretty..uhhh...simple... YMMV, of course ![]()
__________________ nikki k | |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |