![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| need help with gear purchases | satiricalwonder | So much gear, so little time! | 0 | 24th August 2006 07:07 AM |
| Gear Purchases | Nick_1234 | Low End Theory | 0 | 29th April 2006 08:47 AM |
| mic/preamp combo for particular quality. | PJD3 | Low End Theory | 3 | 20th October 2005 12:45 AM |
| What's more important, Quality or Quantity when it comes to being a Gearslutz? | Remoteness | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 24 | 5th June 2004 05:35 PM |
| Quality vs quantity? | Tim L | So much gear, so little time! | 20 | 3rd April 2004 03:15 AM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Racine, WI
Posts: 551
| Mic purchases: Quality or Quantity or somehow both? If your best microphones were a pair of Neumann KM-84s, a Royer r-121 and an AT-4060 and you also had some bread and butter shures, MXLs, Audix and blues...what would you do next with a budget of $5000 - $7000. Get one biggie like a Korby Kat 4 or a vintage U something or other...or would you spread the wealth and get some less expensive Soundelux or Peluso or AEA... what and why ? Quantity or Quality? Can a person have both ? I am interrested in opinions and how you would get the best bang for the buck in order of importance. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 991
| I would mix it up a little..... you have to remember the service on the vintage mics. U87 (non Ai) $1500 Peulso 22 47LE $1600 Peluso 22 51 $1200 and go from there. There are other great mics you can fit in the budget as well. Thats about $4300 right threre. I would grab a Mojave MA 200 and there is your 5K and 4 great mics! |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Orlando
Posts: 1,191
| Well... what's your average clientele? I think the answer depends on that and also on your space. Like... do you have the facility to track a whole band straight to tape or do you normally do solo artists more often? And what kind of budget do your clients come in with, what do they expect, what fills their needs and what styles (if any in particular) do you cater to? I confess, I do like the 'more is more' train of thought on this one. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Racine, WI
Posts: 551
| What is the Peluso 22 51 close to sonically ? As for clients, when I do everything from remote tracking of Jazz combos (I have no piano) with and 8 channel millennia. In mys studio which is currently one room only as I get ready to build a tracking room at next fall / early spring (depends on house remodeling plans and $$$). I will track rhythm sections together. I can do 16 channels at once, b ut usually use 10 to 12 at most...heck most of the bands / musicians I record usually want to do everything track by track, although that is not my preference. Musically I have done, Rap, Christain Contemporary, Jazz, Brit Pop, Folk, Celtic, Ambeint, classic neil young'y rock and such. I usually do not do indie rock and metal as there are other studio's in town who do that better and I am really fine with that. Budget wise it is all over, I charge $350 per day and most projects come in around $1000 to $7000 PV |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Chicago
Posts: 612
| Personally, I'd go bigger, older and fewer. Like a blue chip tube mic. Something that will appreciate while you use it. Think of it as the engineers 401K. |
| | |
| | #6 | ||
| Moderator Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Boston,MA Providence,RI
Posts: 10,056
| Quote:
Quote:
| ||
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Racine, WI
Posts: 551
| Ok so here's what I am thinking... AEA-R84 Shure SM-7 RE-20 Peluso 2247 LE Peluso 51 Neumann U87 or Pearlman TM-1 added to my current line up of: Neumann KM-84 (x2) Shure SM-81 (x2) Shure SM-57 (x2) Audix CX-111 (x2) Audix Micro-mini (x3) Audix D-1 Audix D-3 Audix D-4 Audix D-6 (can you tell I am an audix fan) MXL V-6 (x2) Blue Bluebird Blue Ball AKG C-1000s AT Pro-37r AT 4047 AT 4060 I am leary of the U87 as I am not sure how to avoid the AI version and find a good older regular U87 ??? So I am considering the Pearlman instead... Also I am thinking about a pair of Beyer M-160s and also I tried a pair shure ksm 44s a while back and thought they sounded great on vocals. They won every mic shootout on 2 of the 4 singers in a 4 part vocal group. I am pretty sold on a peluso asap...probably the 47 re-issue. Anyone see any obvious omissions or holes here ? PV |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Moderator Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Boston,MA Providence,RI
Posts: 10,056
| I like your list, but I think the Peluso 47 LE and Pearlman TM-1 are very close and might be a little bit of a duplication there. They use the same capsule. Also, it's probably not a bad idea to have a pair of condensers... so, maybe get a pair of the 47 LE's, or 251's, or maybe get another 4060. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Richmond Hill, Ontario (Canada)
Posts: 2,465
| You might want to check out some Charter Oak mics, great stuff. You could also make do with a big Money vocal mic (relatively speaking), like a used AKG C12VR ($2500), or a Telefunken USA Elam 251 F ($3500) Couldn't hurt to have a couple of AKG 414's in the mix - they are pretty much standards in many studios You may also want to check out Lawson Mics as well. I am not a big Ribbon buy so I would put the AEA last I liked the concept of the Kat 4, I just wasn't a fan of how they sounded.
__________________ "In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey" - Beck, Loser "I do use compressors/limiters but not for controlling dynamics, I use EQ for that!" Jp22 (damn I miss him) "Education is a progressive discovery of our own ignorance." -- Will Durant, historian (1885-1981) "I try to get a boom out of the bass drum, in one of my albums, my CD, boom, I try to get that big boom, I could not get a big boom, I paid bucks, and could not get the boom" - Recording Expert, Tad Donley |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: NYC
Posts: 385
| i have both a vintage U87 and a Pearlman TM1 they both have "the smell of money" get the best you cant afford |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Racine, WI
Posts: 551
| I thought I read somewhere that the Pearlman and Peluso's were similar. About the 414's, I have avoided them for years, every time I have used them I have never warmed up to their sound. Not sure why, in fact this will sound odd, but I have never heard an AKG I liked...(I used to work at a music store where I could borrow and try them), of course I have never used a C-12 or clone. How on earth does peluso do what they do so affordably ? I am considering the 47, 51 and c-12 in that order over the next few months. As to stereo pairs which of the peluso's would be the better bet as a stereo set ? I have also been on the lookout for a second 4060 but when ever I see one used at a good price I always wait and use the $$$ towards other gear. I think a second 4047 would rock too, a great little mic. PV |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Moderator Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Boston,MA Providence,RI
Posts: 10,056
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 991
| I still stick with my first post. And you kind of need a U87. To me the older and the newer have the advantages and disadvantages. But a U87 is an expected mic and will be used a lot. Dont skimp there. And do not get a c12vr over a Peulso 22 51 or their new P12. Save the grand or more and get the handmade mics. I have used and owned both and still have the 22 51. |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Racine, WI
Posts: 551
| I would love a good older (pre AI) 87 with a transformer and the "proper" head room Any ideas on how and were to find a good condition U87 ??? I have seen a few on e-bay but they look pretty beat and I don't think a lot of sellers get the AI...I...thing so even I am not sure what I am getting Thanks for all of the suggestions, I am 100% sold on at least a 2247 LE for starters followed by a 2251 and then a U87 (unless I find a good one 1st at a good price). What do you guys think of the AEA ? Is that redundant with my R-121 or are they completely different ? PV |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Downey, CA
Posts: 548
| Quote:
Just my opinion. No disrespect intended. ![]() | |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Racine, WI
Posts: 551
| I own a pair of MXL V-6s and I bought them for their sound. They are great on strings, some voices and especially percussion, but they are not my go to mic. I may some day pick up one of the Mogami Tube MXLs just for fun, and while I have no hesitation recomending MXL mics to beginers and pro's looking for different flavors, I really feel its time to move up to the next tier with the Peluso, AEA, yes even Neumann rout. Just like moving from RNC's and DBX to 1176's and Distressors... PV |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 991
| I got a great u87 from the disney studio in Hollywood then my stupid ass sold it!!! GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR.... . now I just got another one. Anyways, I really think that all 87's have a transformer but I am not sure. I think just eh electronics changed. From the battery pack and some smaller changes for decreased noise and all that. Is there a difference? Yes, I think the older ones are just old and used and abused, therefore they are darker and more rich or warm. The newer ones are a little more harsh (not the word). But still they have their qualities. |
| | |
| | #18 | |
| Moderator Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Boston,MA Providence,RI
Posts: 10,056
| Quote:
hiphop vocal chain(whats yours) While there is a lot of flaming, there is some really useful information in my posts on the differences. | |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Racine, WI
Posts: 551
| Cool, thanks Tony. I feel a little more educated now...there always seems to be the standard "older is better" vibe on GS and in one of the initial responces to this thread someone mentioned to get a "non AI". Also they mentioned a non AI 87 should be about $1500, the new ones I see are much more than that. PV |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Motown legend Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Songwriter Gulch, Nashville TN
Posts: 5,246
| I'd get 3 Beyer M-88s, 4 57s, a Neumann FET 47 and put everything left over into Gefells. |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Racine, WI
Posts: 551
| Thats not fair Mr. O... pulling switch like that...dynamics, a solid state neumann and gefells. I know folks who own Gefells and love them (m 930's I think), but they are very pricey. PV |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 991
| Hey Tony... what is the "sound" of a U67? I never had the choice to see or use one. What does it sound like? A mix of a 47 and 87? Dark? |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Devil's Slide
Posts: 122
| I dunno, seems like you have dynamics and budget condensors pretty well covered. Why not go for a real heavy-hitter? Your collection needs a crown jewel. Maybe... -vintage U47 or fet47 -BLUE Bottle w/ a couple of capsules -Gefell UM75 -Horch RM2J -Brauner VMA -Sony C800G -Manley Gold Reference You get the idea. ![]() |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,357
| I'm with raggedy up here. I wasn't gonna post, but it seems to me your going sideways. You have the mics to do the grunt work, now you need your money chain. I've been fortunate enough to use some of the great classics as well as modern classics, and they make life good. They also require less processing. Having said that I would consider a U47, Tele Ela M251 (reports are the USA version are up to snuff as well) or a Brauner. If your looking for a K67/87 styled mic, I use a tube modded U87ai (innertube audio) that I find more usefull that a U67. |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Racine, WI
Posts: 551
| What exactly is the "Innertube mod" and why would you mod a U87 instead of finding a real U67 ? PV |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Racine, WI
Posts: 551
| Ok I used the search function and found the innertube answers... Sorry, PV |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2004 Location: Toronto Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,516
| I just have an old Shure SM57 and Shure Beta SM58 for general duties and when I need something good, I beg/borrow/steal/rent a Neumann U47. Problem solved. |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 190
| I personally find the U87 a good utility mic, but not a very good price/performance ratio. But of course, the N name has a customer draw which is something that must be considered for anyone who runs a business. I think I'd rather look into the Gefell or Brauner line of products, which both gives you great mics and nice German brand names... Definitely get an SM7 and a clean low noise preamp for it, if you don't already have one. I'd also consider some more ribbon mics, like a pair of Beyer M160's. Not too expensive, nice for overheads, one of my favourite guitar amp mics, among other things. Does your "bread and butter" mics include 421's and 441's? If not – definitely get at least one of each. As you can hear I'm leaning more towards getting several decent mics rather that a few super expensive ones. A lot of praise for the Pelusos here – are they really that good? Cheers, Henrik
__________________ http://www.musikermagasinet.com |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|