![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Reamping question | BLT | High end | 3 | 23rd May 2006 02:08 PM |
| Distressors ( A stupid question!) | jpupo74 | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 6th January 2006 06:47 AM |
| I have a stupid question - BUT...... | j.m | Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production | 3 | 29th December 2005 06:51 PM |
| stupid avalon m5 question | cebolao | So much gear, so little time! | 5 | 28th January 2004 03:19 PM |
| This might be a stupid question.... need advice | Nevelicious | So much gear, so little time! | 7 | 28th January 2004 01:54 PM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 262
| a stupid question about reamping Would this work for reamping: turning a balanced +4 soundcard output way down and passing the signal backwards through a passive DI. Anyone tried this? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,761
| Yes and no. Read the blurb at www.reamp.com to see what they say about this. Basically, you need to achieve 3 things: balanced to unbalanced low z to high z +4 line level down to instrument level - whatever that is, probably -20. The reverse passive DI box achieves the first two, but you have an enormous amount of level that you need to disipate. A reamp box is little more than a transformer DI box in reverse, with some resistors and a level pot for adjusting. I've got away with using a passive guitar volume pedal, but it's not elegant. |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |