Going through effect circuitry, without effecting. - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!

Going through effect circuitry, without effecting.
Topic: New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 4th July 2012   #1
Gear addict
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 392

Thread Starter
Going through effect circuitry, without effecting.

I've heard about running signals through older outboard gear to effect the sound, without actually "effecting" it; for example, running a signal through a compressor, but not actually compressing the signal,just sending the signal through the old electronics.

Does anyone do this? I'm looking to improve my electric guitar recordings right now. While I never use compression when i record e-guitar, i wonder if i should send the signal through my 1178 anyway. Will do some experimenting later, though curious to know others experience with this.
mikoo69 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 4th July 2012   #2
Gear Guru
 
theblue1's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 17,655

I came up in the era of old gear. Since the early 60s, I've been struggling for higher fidelity in playback and, since the 80s, in both personal and professional music production. I've got puhlenty of old electronics gear I could run signal through. There are times I've gone for a 'dirty' sound but, mostly, I find that sort of willful-mangling approach gimmicky and artificial. (Sometimes, gimmicky and artificial is exactly what's called for, of course.) But for my tastes, I typically find the effects I'm looking for on the subtle end of the mangling spectrum, a little compression, the right EQ.

Others, though, who have only known the supposedly 'too clean' sound of cheap digital, seem to think that the answer to their less-than-pleasing recordings and mixes is to go to the other end of the fidelity spectrum, indulging in willful degradation of the signal -- even going past 'warm' distortion of saturated analog gear into the ear-grating, disharmonic crackle and grit of intentional digital overload (as opposed to the peculiarly unsatisfying and unresponsive but not necessarily ear-grinding saturation effects often supplied by DSP). Sometimes that is what is called for. I guess.
__________________

day job | music and social stuff | mutant pop on facebook | roots acoustic on facebook | A Year of Songs


The chorus is a little weak... I think it needs more lasers.
theblue1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 4th July 2012   #3
Lives for gear
 
John Suitcase's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,358

You could try it, of course!

My biggest improvement when recording electric guitars came from using good mic preamps, with transformer inputs. I'm talking mostly about distorted guitars, in this case.

Of course, there are about a million variables to consider, everything from the instrument and amp to mics, room, etc.
John Suitcase is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 4th July 2012   #4
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 564

Before I run a signal through any additional gear or processing I find it useful to ask the question; "What am I trying to accomplish here?"

The answer can be as simple as just wanting to experiment with something to see what it can do, but I always ask it. When working on a project the answer is almost always much more specific than that. What about your recorded sound bothers you, and what do you think could be done to the signal that would solve that problem? Most of the stuff I bought for "mojo" has turned out to be far less useful than your average DAW eq section for fixing problems with the sound. Sometimes it can help, but more often it just adds noise and creates another layer of trouble unless I have a specific reason in advance for using it.

My short answer would be "Yes, but..."
__________________
What do you mean "make it cut through the mix"? I've been trying all afternoon to bury it with a stake through it's heart!
Go Nigel Go is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 4th July 2012   #5
Gear Guru
 
theblue1's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 17,655

^^

Good posts and points from John and Nigel.


Of course, a lot of times you might not have access to gear you'd like to experiment with -- but when one already has the gear, the easiest most direct way to figure out if it might be of any use to you in given contexts is simply to dig in and explore its capabilities and performance aspects.

Others may have interesting parallel experiences, but it's not necessarily likely they will have the same gear and gear context as you, the same approach to recording, or the be seeking the same desired results.

That's why, with so many questions of this type, the answer for any given individual and gear set up is to experiment and explore.
theblue1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2012   #6
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Location: Cincinnati OH
Posts: 1,658

Some newer plugins simulate this as well. For example, the Waves CLA76 has a setting that has the compressor off, but still simulates the signal going through the transformers, etc. the Slate Digital VCC can be used this way as well. So this is another option to try if you don't want to hook up cables and stuff.
nst7 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2012   #7
Gear Guru
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 12,954

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikoo69 View Post
I've heard about running signals through older outboard gear to effect the sound, without actually "effecting" it; for example, running a signal through a compressor, but not actually compressing the signal,just sending the signal through the old electronics.

Does anyone do this? I'm looking to improve my electric guitar recordings right now. While I never use compression when i record e-guitar, i wonder if i should send the signal through my 1178 anyway. Will do some experimenting later, though curious to know others experience with this.
I have some old tube EQs that I sometimes use without EQing anything. I once reamped a whole jazz mix through them with no EQ, just the tubes and the transformers.

There is a price to be paid for this. Noise, fuzz, lack of clarity. Sometimes it is well worth it, sometimes it is not. The trick, IMO is to be honest with yourself.

Just don't be seduced by the 'mojo' without also considering the alternative.
__________________
.

“What you ask about is music. What you like is sound. Now music and sound are akin, but they are not the same.”
— Confucius
joeq is online now  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Live vocal through guitar pedal setup question Polymerben Live Sound 25 25th April 2011 11:40 AM
Stereo effects and effects levels, I need help. EYE Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 5 15th February 2007 09:43 PM
Use IK Multimedia Amplitube 2 w/ real effects, Izotope Trash? alexbutterfield Low End Theory 4 24th December 2006 11:48 PM
Effects processor for sax.... MPX1 or Voiceworks? Jbroad572 Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 1 25th November 2006 05:21 PM
Effects processor for live bass guitar owennnnn Live Sound 2 18th October 2006 01:20 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:11 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.