![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Digi 002 Control Surface vs Digi Control 8 + 002 Rack ? | bjm007 | Music computers | 25 | 17th September 2006 06:46 PM |
| which control surface for my digi 002r? | waffle waitress | So much gear, so little time! | 15 | 19th May 2006 09:49 AM |
| Sound quality: Digi 001 w/Digimax @24/48 or Digi 002 @24/96? | zonkola | Music computers | 9 | 24th March 2006 07:43 AM |
| Does Digi still plan to make a "high end" Control surface? | Mind-Over-Midi | High end | 8 | 5th November 2003 12:26 AM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear Head | Digi 002R vs Digi 002 Control Surface Is it worth it to get the control surface? Is it worth for the Digidesign products or should I look at something else? |
| | |
| | #2 | |
| Gear maniac | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: San Francisco
Posts: 82
| I'm planning to get the M-audio Project Mix I/O and M-Powered Pro Tools. It offers a clock in option, which the 002 does not. It is also cheaper. If you are not doing work with video, the M-Powered version seems to be otherwise equivalent to LE. I will likely get a Rosetta 800 so that I can use my own mic pres (and get the advantage of better converters). But to answer your question directly, I think there is great advantage in having a set of faders when mixing. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Devil's Slide
Posts: 122
| A friend of mine had the 002 w/control surface, then traded it in on a 002r and Mackie controller and is much happier. It might just come down to a preference thing, of course, but he says the Mackie is far nicer to work with. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear addict | I would get the rack and then have it modified by Black Lion (http://www.blacklionaudio.com/digi002_mod.html) before I got the normal 002 with faders. But thats just my 002¢. :) |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,663
| I can't see much reason not to get the 002 Rack and then a third-party control surface, which will provide compatibility with other software as well -- and hold its value better. If there's a reason to do the full 002, it's because they hold their value so poorly that you can find them on eBay for $200 or so more than the rack version. JSL |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear Head | this black lion thing sounds wonderful, is there any other information on it |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear addict | http://www.blacklionaudio.com/digi002_mod.html I'm sending my 002 out as soon as I get some money.... |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Gear Head | yea i read that. just curious if there are any users of this mod. |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 2,020
| full 002 can be used standalone mixer, you will also get the extra plug-ins and an ilok command8 can be used as a stand alone controller. a 002 or a 002r and command 8 is goign to givae you the same functionality so decide if you want you i/o on your desk or in a rack. in many ways im glad i went for the 002 and sometimesi think having all i/o in a rack would be easier. a project mix doesnt have the 10bit digi faders, its made to be a MIDI controller so im not sure how good teh intergration is but if it works for you. but the sound of any M-Audio no thanx but definatly a cheeper way if you going to use 3rd party converters anyway, which is one of the few situaltion where MP would be a better option IMO. another option is to get a 002r and save up for a control 24 |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 534
| If that black lion mod is any good, it's a great thing (though I'm still an 001 user, so not so relevant to me). Using outboard converters is always a solution to get past the bad Digi converter situation, but improving the onboard converters makes it useful for ANOTHER 8 ins and out, instead of just a dongle. |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Burlington, CT
Posts: 222
| I have the 002, and while it was handy at first to have those faders right there, I really don't use them much anymore. When it comes to mixing I tend to write automation with the mouse instead of the control surface, for better or worse. I do still use the transport buttons, but in reality, keyboard shortcuts are just as easy. And really, how many ways do we really need to press "play?" I'd get the Mackie and the 002R if I had it to do over again. |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: St.Clairsville, OH/ Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 11
| my home mix station is an 002R, and I am much happier having all my I/O in a rack than the surface.. besides... trusting both my control and I/O in one unit is a little risky... at least I know if my control surface craps out, I can still mix in the box :-) |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Gear maniac | i had the same problem when purchasing my 003. i messed with one of my buddys 003 factory and realized that the console wasn't worth the extra dough, and it could be better spent on mics/preamps/etc. so i got the 003rack and am really satisfied.
__________________ zac |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |