Parallel Compression in more detail... - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!


Parallel Compression in more detail...

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 31st May 2006   #1
Lives for gear
 
Worlez's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Location: Liverpool, UK
Posts: 562

Thread Starter
Parallel Compression in more detail...

First post here

Following on from the thread a few weeks ago, I'd like to start something up that goes into your parallel compression tactics in more detail. How many different compressors do you bus to, which ones, which instruments/mics goto what etc. What are your favourite compressors/plug-ins and settings?

Right now, since I'm mixing ITB here at home I'm sending my entire kit to a Drum sub, which in turn gets pre-fader sends to a NomadFactory Fairchild FA70 plugin on one aux and a BF76 on another. I tend to eq the Fairchild channel, boosting lows and highs, to give the whole kit some real punch, and use the BF76 to really get the kick thumping. I also compress/eq/gate on individual channels. Lately though I've been getting tired of those techniques, so I thought it'd be cool to get some input from other people

So how are you all doing it? Do you prefer parallel compression to simply compressing a drum sub?

Cheers

Al
Worlez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st May 2006   #2
Gear nut
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Location: Staffs, UK
Posts: 135

Iv been getting some alright results using Waves TransX to bring out the transients on one sub, then using Sonalksis in crush mode on another. I also use PSP Vintage Warmer at some point, usually before I go into the compression channels.

Still experimenting with this setup, but adding the Vint into the cocktail has made a lot of difference.

TB
tee boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st May 2006   #3
Gear nut
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 132

I find myself using more parallel compression in my mixes. I also mix ITB although I will go to outboard gear and record it to a new track. If it's a "needs to be loud" (what isn't these days?) mix then I'll set up a parallel comp for a drum sub, bass sub, gtr sub, vox/bvox sub. I usually use the Digi Maxim with the Focusrite red eq plug before it for additional tone shaping. I'm always experimenting although it does seem to me that I need to futz less with individual tracks when I set up the parallel comps early in the mix process. Less processing on the individual tracks seems to keep things cleaner in the mix. You definitely have to have some type of delay compensation for this especially with the look-ahead type comps. It's still an ongoing process but I feel it is taking my mixes in a better direction.
chuckj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st June 2006   #4
Lives for gear
 
Worlez's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Location: Liverpool, UK
Posts: 562

Thread Starter
Bump

Al
Worlez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st June 2006   #5
Gear maniac
 
Nerdyrocker's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 210

Maybe I am missing something here but it sounds like you guys are using multiple drum submixes/buses. Is that right? Are you not worried about phase issues? Well I guess I should ask, are there phase issues?

This is interesting. Please do tell more.
__________________
"Music is changing, I'm changing, and I don't want to make the same sounds forever." -Tchad Blake

www.calebkeiter.com
Nerdyrocker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st June 2006   #6
Gear addict
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 422

I almost always use it at least with kick and snare. Putting distortion on the "compression" buss also is a fun trick.
__________________
One good thing about music, when it hits you, you feel no pain.
Ahellam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st June 2006   #7
Lives for gear
 
Worlez's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Location: Liverpool, UK
Posts: 562

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerdyrocker
Maybe I am missing something here but it sounds like you guys are using multiple drum submixes/buses. Is that right? Are you not worried about phase issues? Well I guess I should ask, are there phase issues?

This is interesting. Please do tell more.
I'd never actually worried about this, since I am mixing entirely ITB.

Does anyone more experienced than I know if this will be a problem?

Al
Worlez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st June 2006   #8
Jai guru deva om
 
warhead's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 12,259

Slightly off topic but concerning the same thing:

I don't really do the parallel compression thing. I stick an AEA R84 ribbon mic about 3 feet in front of the kit so that it picks up all the growl and punch of the kit, with enough cymbals anyhow but that's not the focus. Then I EQ the highs and the lows boosted pretty heavily for a big sound, pump the hell out of it usually with the UAD-1 1176LN, getting it to breathe in time with the song. I then blend that in, maybe at 1/3 fader depending on desired effect, and it's there. Adds such a great pump to the song, yet it's subtle.

Sort of like using delays, I usually don't want to "hear" them but if you mute the send you miss it instantly.

War
__________________
Warren Dent, Owner - ZenPro Audio: Gear Now & Zen

warhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st June 2006   #9
Jai guru deva om
 
warhead's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 12,259

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerdyrocker
Maybe I am missing something here but it sounds like you guys are using multiple drum submixes/buses. Is that right? Are you not worried about phase issues? Well I guess I should ask, are there phase issues?

This is interesting. Please do tell more.
In Nuendo I have it setup to compensate for delays using plugs etc so I've never noticed an issue. Check the setup in your DAW, it may or may not already be enabled.

War
warhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st June 2006   #10
Lives for gear
 
feyshay's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,358

Cubase and Nuendo also allow you to compensate for the delay in sending to an external effects unit. It "pings" the external unit and compensates for whatever it reads as the delay. Totally took care of the phase I was having when I was sending to my KSP8. It makes parallel compression a very viable option when ITB.
feyshay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th June 2006   #11
Lives for gear
 
Worlez's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Location: Liverpool, UK
Posts: 562

Thread Starter
Anyone else?

I've been playing with different approaches lately, and now I'm using two seperate parallel auxes, one for high freq and one for low. They both go through different comrpessors plugins and different eq's, whcih means I have three drum channels - the dry one, which only has mild eq/dynamics on individual mics, the low end channel, and the high end channel.

Nice way of controlling how the drums sound in a mix.

Al
Worlez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th October 2006   #12
Gear Head
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 54

Send a message via MSN to VictorQ
I've gotten pretty descent results with sending a lot of different sources to the same comp-buss. In fact i use a mono-comp, a Tube-Tech CL 1B, for this. I've dubbed it 'the excitement buss'.
I'll send the most important elements in the song to this buss (ie. maybe snare and kik and gui, or vox and piano and shaker.) and have them fight for attention !

It'll work with any kind of 'colour-comp', though not one that eats the high end (at least not to my taste). For a plug i think i'd use the Chandler-EMI TG or maybe Inflator? If I wasn't bound by PT i'd buy a UAD and run the LA or 1176.

The fun thing about using a mono-buss is when something is panned off-center, it automatically pans toward the center when it is loud. You thus have a self controlling stereo management system (SCSMS). Won't work for everything, if not use a stereo-buss (or none at all).

I haven't tried it with bass, reckon it won't work...

Last edited by VictorQ; 14th October 2006 at 10:35 AM.. Reason: more info
VictorQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th October 2006   #13
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Location: Ky.
Posts: 637

I like rolling the highs out. You are looking for big girth, not nasty brass.
__________________
You CAN polish a turd... if you freeze it first.
tubedude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th October 2006   #14
Lives for gear
 
Alexi's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 1,222

Quote:
Originally Posted by tee boy View Post
Iv been getting some alright results using Waves TransX to bring out the transients on one sub, then using Sonalksis in crush mode on another. I also use PSP Vintage Warmer at some point, usually before I go into the compression channels.

Still experimenting with this setup, but adding the Vint into the cocktail has made a lot of difference.

TB


i know a lot of people like the psp vitage warmer................every time i use it it messes up the signal in a bad way, especially the compressor...........
Alexi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th October 2006   #15
Lives for gear
 
vtone's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Location: Endlessly On Tour
Posts: 745

Quote:
Originally Posted by warhead View Post
Slightly off topic but concerning the same thing:

I don't really do the parallel compression thing. I stick an AEA R84 ribbon mic about 3 feet in front of the kit so that it picks up all the growl and punch of the kit, with enough cymbals anyhow but that's not the focus. Then I EQ the highs and the lows boosted pretty heavily for a big sound, pump the hell out of it usually with the UAD-1 1176LN, getting it to breathe in time with the song. I then blend that in, maybe at 1/3 fader depending on desired effect, and it's there. Adds such a great pump to the song, yet it's subtle.

Sort of like using delays, I usually don't want to "hear" them but if you mute the send you miss it instantly.

War
I prefer to do the same thing instead of parallel compression on drums-- I put up a mic that captures the whole kit, the tlm 103 is good for this, squash it on the way in, eq to taste and crush it a little more in the mix (double compressing the tg1 is an amazing sound). I blend that in and it really makes an exciting yet natural drum sound.
__________________
VT1
vtone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th October 2006   #16
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Location: Ky.
Posts: 637

Quote:
Originally Posted by vtone View Post
I prefer to do the same thing instead of parallel compression on drums-- I put up a mic that captures the whole kit, the tlm 103 is good for this, squash it on the way in, eq to taste and crush it a little more in the mix (double compressing the tg1 is an amazing sound). I blend that in and it really makes an exciting yet natural drum sound.
Is this your room mic or a whole seperate mic?
tubedude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th October 2006   #17
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 165

If you are using PT LE (without a third-party PCI effects card) then you do not need to worry about phase if you are using a plugin compressor. LE automatically aligns all audio as a function of its buffering. However, an HD system you can run into problems. However there is always the automatic delay compensation, the insert delay settings, and the TimeAdjuster to deal with this. Or you could just manually nudge a printed version of the effect to align it.
jseveriniii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th October 2006   #18
Gear nut
 
Pronecobra's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 130

Waves SSL Send

I am relatively new to audio recording. I mix in the box with Nuendo 2. I have been putting a URS 1980 compression on my individual bass drum track and EQing tracks separetly using URS N series or A series (Neve emulations & API emulations, respectively) . Then I submix the entire kit and from there send to the Waves SSL bus compressor (or as they call it, the master compressor). I essentially end up with two submixes, one that is simply all of the individual drum tracks consolidated to stereo (otherwise known as a submix, duh!) with no further processing and a second that is compressed with the Waves SSL comp. I blend between the two. This sounds good to me but it is not really parallel compression. I have substituted the Waves SSL comp with PSP Vintage warmer with just OK results; I have also substituted with the Sonalksis SV-315 which sounded pretty good. After reading these posts, I think I will try parallel compression, perhaps sending the submix to the Sonalksis. I like colored compression, so the Waves SSL emu is great for that but I was always affraid that adding the Sonalksis would be overkill in terms of adding color. Perhaps I should add something transparent, maybe Waves Lin Phase multiband. Has anyone tried that plug on a submix?
Pronecobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th October 2006   #19
Lives for gear
 
vtone's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Location: Endlessly On Tour
Posts: 745

Quote:
Originally Posted by tubedude View Post
Is this your room mic or a whole seperate mic?
it's a separate mic.

I have two spots in my room that one of my room mics usually ends up at, depending on the sound I'm trying to get. they're unusual spots (one is in the upper right corner, where the two walls meet the ceiling, mic facing the intersection). they usually don't get compressed, more often they'll get a touch of eq. the focus is to capture the room reflections with as little direct kit as possible.

the squashed mic is for the overall kit, with some emphasis on the kick.

I know it's not a groundbreaking technique I'm sharing-- I just noticed that whenever I've tried to parallel compress the drum buss I never end up following through with it. the crushed mic lets me dial in all the compression I need.

vtone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th October 2006   #20
Lives for gear
 
mahasandi's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,159

i take it out to s/ms double it thru outboard comps bring this into about 600 plugs and limit the hell out
of it with a radio shack compressor


I like Wars suggestion good mic technique.

i'am not meaning to dfegad on this topic but, i do feel like

it all starts with mic technique, though all the cool tricks of compression

are great to hear about , it seems a big part of getting the comps to really work is to

send them sounds captured in good acoustics or i'd say intentional acoustics.

If you can "hear" the rooms your in that really helps to make placement choices .

For each song different compression "arts" should be applied

or at least" compression" should be listening to the individual songs

then i find blaming gear disappear........

(assuming you have comps you like )

Mic technique is not faked its from experience and while you can "throw up"

some mics it might work or you might end -up blaming everything but source

and throw up at what you hear.
mahasandi is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Parallel compression in Rap? beatzz Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 12 5th January 2007 11:42 PM
Parallel Compression Watersound So much gear, so little time! 3 6th March 2006 07:58 AM
What exactly is parallel compression? choodelphia So much gear, so little time! 2 27th October 2005 12:59 AM
Does the "Mix" function on compression plugins equal parallel compression? Maxwolf Music computers 8 5th July 2005 01:10 AM
Parallel Compression Tim Farrant So much gear, so little time! 15 31st March 2005 10:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:30 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.