Is there a good monitoring solution for around $800? - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!


Is there a good monitoring solution for around $800?

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th May 2006   #1
Gear Head
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 60

Thread Starter
Is there a good monitoring solution for around $800?

I don't have a board to run my monitor path from protools through, so... Does anyone have a good recommendation for a dedicated monitoring box? I know that there is the Presonus which is decent, but is there something better for the same amount?

I am coming out of a 96i/o, to two sets of monitors: V8's, and HR824's. Ideally this box would be designed for two sets of monitors and not have any extra features like talkback and stuff that I don't need. I want my money to go towards quality passive electronics that don't distort the master from protools, not towards extra features that I don't need. Anyone have any ideas?
bpert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2006   #2
Lives for gear
 
jdjustice's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: US
Posts: 2,361

Check out the following links to two different monitoring controllers:

Coleman Audio M3PH mkII
Dangerous Music Monitor ST


Cheers,


J.D.
__________________
Justin Justice
jdjustice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2006   #3
Gear Head
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 60

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdjustice
Check out the following links to two different monitoring controllers:

Coleman Audio M3PH mkII
Dangerous Music Monitor ST


Cheers,


J.D.
While the coleman piece is in my range, I don't really need all of those features, the other device is way out of the specified price range and has two many bells and whistles for what I need at this point. Thanks for the input.. but anyone else have some advice?
bpert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2006   #4
Lives for gear
 
ImJohn's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Location: WA USA
Posts: 1,442

Quote:
Originally Posted by bpert
While the coleman piece is in my range, I don't really need all of those features, the other device is way out of the specified price range and has two many bells and whistles for what I need at this point. Thanks for the input.. but anyone else have some advice?
I have the Coleman unit and I wouldn't want to work without it. I'm not sure which 'extra' features bother you but if you find a box that has exactly the features you need now, chances are down the road you might need to expand and that extra output and two extra inputs the Coleman has will come in handy. And yes, if you have them you will use the mono, mute and phase reverse switches from time to time and possibly the headphone amp too.

Coleman Audio does custom work too so you could probably have exactly what you want made up :
----------------------------
From this page http://www.colemanaudio.com/news.htm :
If you don't see exactly what your looking for send an email describing what you need to: coley@colemanaudio.com Or give us a call and tell us what you need. We are a customer driven company. Most of the products here came from the ideas and needs of engineers like yourself. Your idea might not become a product but we do custom work too.
----------------------------

People thinking of buying a Coleman product should also take a close look at the page indicated above!
__________________
John L Rice
http://www.youtube.com/JohnLRice
ImJohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2006   #5
Gear Head
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 60

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by ImJohn
I have the Coleman unit and I wouldn't want to work without it. I'm not sure which 'extra' features bother you but if you find a box that has exactly the features you need now, chances are down the road you might need to expand and that extra output and two extra inputs the Coleman has will come in handy. And yes, if you have them you will use the mono, mute and phase reverse switches from time to time and possibly the headphone amp too.

Coleman Audio does custom work too so you could probably have exactly what you want made up :
----------------------------
From this page http://www.colemanaudio.com/news.htm :
If you don't see exactly what your looking for send an email describing what you need to: coley@colemanaudio.com Or give us a call and tell us what you need. We are a customer driven company. Most of the products here came from the ideas and needs of engineers like yourself. Your idea might not become a product but we do custom work too.
----------------------------

People thinking of buying a Coleman product should also take a close look at the page indicated above!
I guess what I was referring too is the 3 stereo inputs.. While it is nice, I only need one right now. I also don't mind the mute and mono features.
bpert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2006   #6
Gear nut
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Denmark
Posts: 113

The SM Pro Audio M-Patch does what you need, but it's not $800, so maybe too low end?
__________________
www.respirator.dk
respirator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2006   #7
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: Nashville
Posts: 184

Quote:
Originally Posted by bpert
I guess what I was referring too is the 3 stereo inputs.. While it is nice, I only need one right now. I also don't mind the mute and mono features.

Just be care not to press those buttons and you'll be fine.
primalsteve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2006   #8
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: MO USA
Posts: 2,153

I did a lot of looking in this range and less and bought Central Station. Excellent solution for my needs. The Colemans did not have enough routing options for what I wanted, and also no output attenuators for balancing levels. The SMPro M-Patch I had was junk.

As far as
Quote:
quality passive electronics that don't distort the master
the Central Station certainly is capable of this. I'm not one to trust Presonus after their deceitful bait & switch tactics on the MP20. I just simply installed a CS, routed tracks and mixes with it in and out of circuit, and compared the signals. They nulled, and there was no sound difference. What else is there?

Steve
squeegybug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2006   #9
Lives for gear
 
ImJohn's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Location: WA USA
Posts: 1,442

Quote:
Originally Posted by bpert
I guess what I was referring too is the 3 stereo inputs.. While it is nice, I only need one right now. I also don't mind the mute and mono features.

Gotcha. One thing I've found as useful for the extra inputs is to use them for the analog outs of a DAT, cassette, CD/DVD and keyboard submixer etc. That way, if the computer isn't on and I want to listen to something without firing it up I can do so.
ImJohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th May 2006   #10
Gear Head
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 60

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by squeegybug
I did a lot of looking in this range and less and bought Central Station. Excellent solution for my needs. The Colemans did not have enough routing options for what I wanted, and also no output attenuators for balancing levels. The SMPro M-Patch I had was junk.

As far as the Central Station certainly is capable of this. I'm not one to trust Presonus after their deceitful bait & switch tactics on the MP20. I just simply installed a CS, routed tracks and mixes with it in and out of circuit, and compared the signals. They nulled, and there was no sound difference. What else is there?

Steve
Your talk of built in attenuators sparked my curiosity as I am using the built in attenuators on both the KRK V8's and HR-824's that I have. Is this a bad idea, or is this what they are for? Would it be better to turn up the attenuators on the speakers to +6 and use attenuators from a monitor box to control the signal level from Pro Tools? Any help is always appreciated.
bpert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th May 2006   #11
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: MO USA
Posts: 2,153

Quote:
Originally Posted by bpert
Your talk of built in attenuators sparked my curiosity as I am using the built in attenuators on both the KRK V8's and HR-824's that I have. Is this a bad idea, or is this what they are for? Would it be better to turn up the attenuators on the speakers to +6 and use attenuators from a monitor box to control the signal level from Pro Tools? Any help is always appreciated.
That is what they are for. It shouldn't matter whether you use the ones on the monitor amps or on the controller, but one set should be enough.... If it reduces as far as you need to be able to calibrate your controller properly.

Steve
squeegybug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th May 2006   #12
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,389

I sold my central station and built my own passive switch box/ volume control for well under $100. The central station might be passive but I found it far from transparent. DACT & Goldpoint both make stepped attenuators. Just add rotary switches for input & output selection and put it all in a box.
__________________
Tom
Denyle Custom Guitars
TAVD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd June 2006   #13
Gear Head
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 60

Thread Starter
I set my monitors attenuators all the way up and am attenuating with my M3PH II, can't believe the improvement in sound quality..
bpert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd June 2006   #14
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: MO USA
Posts: 2,153

Hmmm. So how much travel do you have now in the Coleman single attenuator, before you reach "too loud"?

That is what the individual speaker trims are for -- to set a proper gain structure and to allow the main "volume control" to have enough resolution and accurate L/R balance by operating through its entire sweep range.

Since the Coleman devices do not have these individual channel trims you cannot set it to produce equal SPL in pairs of monitors with different sensitivities, so that will have to be done at the amps or elsewhere, if necessary.

Steve
squeegybug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd June 2006   #15
Lives for gear
 
gsilbers's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: El Pueblo de Nuestra Senora La Reina de Los Angeles de Porciuncula
Posts: 3,622

this is a waaaaaayyy low end but for the price theres nothing to loose by trying it.
well, 35bucks and a little time.
the minimon800 from beringer. new seires. \

can choose 4 inputs, 3 pairs of speakers , mute, dim, mono, talk to cue (i dont use) and 2 headphones.

works for the outs of protools mix w/o disto.

i compared it w mackies big knob and sound doenst change almost at all. just laking the big knob and better or confy talkback features. it only like $35 bucks.

no xlr input so i got adapters to rca and 1/4.

small convinient, got for my portable setup, then used for main setup
gsilbers is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best monitoring calibration solution RainbowStorm So much gear, so little time! 3 30th August 2006 07:49 PM
Speck is a good solution for analog summing?! 16 STEREO CHANELS...!!! blue_scorpion High end 8 18th March 2006 02:38 AM
Better solution for C24 monitoring passionmax So much gear, so little time! 14 20th November 2005 12:13 AM
Analog + Digital Monitoring Solution? apsisband So much gear, so little time! 0 12th November 2005 04:31 AM
Does Rosetta 800 Firemix have true zero latency monitoring? Mark Warren High end 1 2nd November 2005 03:55 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:29 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.