recording ITB vocals on a separate session to save on CPU - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!


recording ITB vocals on a separate session to save on CPU

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 22nd May 2006   #1
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 582

Thread Starter
recording ITB vocals on a separate session to save on CPU

i was wondering if this is a bad idea.

i've done it a couple of times and like the results. but i'm wondering if there are any issues as far as bouncing too many times.

what i do is:

record the music (with just a scratch vocal) and then mix with a bunch of plugins and my cpu meter almost max. i mix with nothing in the 2 buss to wav 24 bit 44.1.

then i start a new session, import the music mix wav, now i add all vocals. doubling and parallel compression ect. here my cpu is almost maxed again. i then mix with a comp for glue in the 2 buss to wav 24 bit 44.1

THEN, i start a NEW session. i import the new music/vocal mix. and master using a bunch of stuff in the 2 buss. thats when i bounce to 16 bit mp3.

so would bouncing this many times "deteriorate" the wav files?

thanks
dj_who is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2006   #2
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,075

Bouncing digital files is lossless. But it sounds like hard work - and only worthwhile if your DAW has track limitations (like Protools).

With a decent DAW like Cubase, it's easier to simply move all your backing tracks into a folder to clear some space on the screen. You could render a backing track and then disable all other tracks. That means that your CPU and disk are only streaming a single stereo audio file.

I'm not sure why you are struggling with CPU issues. Tracking audio is mainly disk activity. Are you slapping plugins on every track or something? Try to track without plugins. Or if you really need to hear some reverb or something, set up a group bus so that you only need one instance.

With something like Cubase, it's important to realise that Mute doesn't stop an audio track from streaming. You need to Disable the track. Otherwise the system resources increase as you add more tracks.
__________________
My carbon footprint is bigger than yours.
Kiwiburger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2006   #3
Lives for gear
 
5down1up's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,006

never worked for me ... not in fact of a quality loss during the bounce but for the reason that i dont have access to the single tracks to mix it " right ".

if its working for you its not a problem.

5down1up is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2006   #4
Lives for gear
 
amost's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,055

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5down1up
never worked for me ... not in fact of a quality loss during the bounce but for the reason that i dont have access to the single tracks to mix it " right ".

if its working for you its not a problem.


yeah I've tried that with subbing out drums as a stereo pair & then importing that pair into another session that was about CPU maxxed, never got it right.
__________________
Me at
amost is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2006   #5
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 582

Thread Starter
thank you for the replies.

Quote:
Are you slapping plugins on every track or something?
not on every track but enough of them. i do the group thing but i also like plugs on some individual tracks as well. also my PC isn't the fastest. :( so by the time i get to doing vocals, i'm pretty much maxed.

i would love to upgrade to cubase sx because that has track freeze and that would make my life easier.


thanks again !
dj_who is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2006   #6
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,075

You can still freeze your tracks manually (export audio, import it).

But you don't really need plugins on everything while you are tracking vocals, do you?
Kiwiburger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2006   #7
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 582

Thread Starter
i've done the freezing manually thing but its a pain. i often decide i want to change something and then i have to bring back the original track again.

i usually mix as i go, so i wind up accumilating plugs.
dj_who is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2006   #8
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,075

It's not a great idea to mix before you have your vocals in place.

All you need for the vocal guide track is a basic beat, and some padding so the vocalist can pitch. Maybe some bass, but that can throw off the vocalist pitch if excessive. I like to use virtual instruments that I know are pitch accurate.

I don't think you really need any plugins to get a good guide track in place. Once you have your vocals all compiled and edited, and your system resources are freed up again, you can go crazy.
Kiwiburger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2006   #9
Gear maniac
 
dirren's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 207

If you know exactly what sound you are going for the mentioned approach can be considered. I've worked on difficult drum tracks (lots of edits) in a separate session, bounced to stereo and then used that in another "mix" template session. But then again, that's when i've had a pretty clear goal for where I was heading with the drums. I'm not sure I would do it with vocals though.

/Matt
__________________
15K Studios, SWE
dirren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2006   #10
Lives for gear
 
lawrence_o's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: Belgium
Posts: 683

I always make an instrumental "demo" mix which I import for tracking vocals.

That way, I only have 1 track for the music and I can focus more on the vocals.
Then, I make a selection of the best vocal takes, apply some pitch correction and timing corrections if necessary.

I then bounce 1, 2, 3, ... submixes of e.g. Lead 1, Backings, choires etc.
These, I import back into the musical arrangement to do the final leveling, mixing etc.

Works everytime. No loss of quality. Note that I do bounce the vocals WITHOUT any effects or EQ! I do that in the arrangement.

Regards
Lawrence
__________________
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grooveyard Productions:

http://top-producers.blogspot.com/

SSL6048E/G
32Ch Prismsound ADA-8 out
G5 Quad, PTHD3 Acell, Waves Platinum, SoundToys,
DUY and then some...
Some outboard: AMS-NEVE, Eve H8000FW,
Lexicon300L etc.

WANTED, Neve1073, 1083,1084!
lawrence_o is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th May 2006   #11
Lives for gear
 
espasonico's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 663

I do that very often because of latency in LE. But waht I do is to import the vocal tracks to the Big session. Sometimes I bounce the BVs and import the bounce.
espasonico is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
recording a live session? Pilepoile Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 10 24th May 2006 03:26 PM
largest session ITB tomwehrle So much gear, so little time! 23 6th March 2006 08:55 PM
Recording Session Musicians Dave Martin High end 12 22nd February 2006 08:58 PM
The kinks recording session Junkie High end 45 30th September 2005 02:34 PM
What's in your "Save the Session" Bag? JonCraig So much gear, so little time! 27 26th May 2005 09:28 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:26 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.