which control surface for my digi 002r? - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!


which control surface for my digi 002r?

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 15th May 2006   #1
Lives for gear
 
turk sanchez's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Austin
Posts: 960

Thread Starter
which control surface for my digi 002r?

I am looking at the Tascam us-2400...24 faders and only $799! Also looking at the comand 8...might work better with Pro Tools? Less faders and more money. Also the Mackie control universal...but this is last on my list.

I have mixed on the Pro Control and the noise from the faders moving was a little much at times...so that is a concern. I would like to hear opinions from people who own/use these units. The Tascam seems like the best deal...just wondering how it gels with pro Tools.

I am on an Imac g5 (not Intel-mac) and running Pro Tools 6.9. Thanks in advance.
turk sanchez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th May 2006   #2
Gear maniac
 
Firefox's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 256

command 8

it'll always work.

plus - does the trashcan unit have track names?
me thinks not.
Firefox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th May 2006   #3
Gear nut
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: Down Under
Posts: 86

ummmmmm....
I think there is already "manny" similar threads why don't you do a search..
shift is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th May 2006   #4
Jai guru deva om
 
warhead's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 12,259

Command 8...

War
warhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th May 2006   #5
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Location: Outer New York
Posts: 205

Well, here's something different...

Consider a used Roland VS-2480. It works great as a control surface, in banks of 8 at a time. In addition, it'll give you a very good all-in-one recorder with lots of inputs, and it's well-suited for remote recording, too. Best of all, it's extremely reliable, so you can always have a backup way to record if your PT rig should stumble at a critical time. The 2480 can export your tracks as wav files, which you can then load into PT LE for further work. The process is a bit cumbersome, but hey...it works!
TheTruffleKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th May 2006   #6
Lives for gear
 
macr0w's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: Charlotte N.C.
Posts: 1,092

If you are using PT get the C/8. The integration is much better than the other options. Been using one since it came out and I love it. I would hate to go without it.
__________________
Rocknrolll doez not need spell check pee-pole!
www.clearspotrecording.com
macr0w is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th May 2006   #7
Lives for gear
 
nukmusic's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Location: Dallas, TX / New Orleans, LA
Posts: 4,667

Send a message via AIM to nukmusic Send a message via Yahoo to nukmusic
Ya, I say stick to Digi's command 8 if you don't already have a controller or can't find a cheap used 3rd party controller.

I think Digi tried to weed out the Mackie Control with, I think 6.4(was it?). Where they didn't include the controller patch in the software. They put it in the "UNSUPPORTED" folder. There was sooooo many posts on DUC. I guess they wanted you to buy their own hardware. Shit, they might try it again soon..
__________________
.
Docta'J aka Big NUK
Practice Makes Progress
www.twitter.com/nukmusic
nukmusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th May 2006   #8
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,008

I tried to use the us2400............

SUCKS with PT!

Always had to restart sessions and froze.... just a mess when you are in the zone!
cap217 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th May 2006   #9
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,424

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheTruffleKing
Consider a used Roland VS-2480. It works great as a control surface, in banks of 8 at a time. In addition, it'll give you a very good all-in-one recorder with lots of inputs, and it's well-suited for remote recording, too. Best of all, it's extremely reliable, so you can always have a backup way to record if your PT rig should stumble at a critical time. The 2480 can export your tracks as wav files, which you can then load into PT LE for further work. The process is a bit cumbersome, but hey...it works!
The ONLY drawback to this (I used to transfer tracks into Logic with my old VS) is in terms of control surface, the faders are not touch-sensitive.. if you plan to do hardcore mixing with your surface an as aid.
__________________
Steve

There are two kinds of light — the glow that illumines, and the glare that obscures.

— James Thurber
astronmr20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th May 2006   #10
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 289

A vote for Mackie Control here, for the simple reason if or when I choose to run a different DAW based program the mackie will most likely have the capability to be used as my controller. Unlike the Command 8 (pt only).

As far as noisy faders....well these have gotten a workout over the yrs (3yrs now) I've owned it and never have a had a problem. All faders work fine with no problems.

It makes me wonder what a noisy fader would sound like? When mixing even at low levels the movement of a faders wouldnt distract me from the song. I cant imagine a fader moving being that loud. Im glad I havent experienced with the Mackie Control.

Peace Eddie
__________________
Who ever said this would be Easy!
http://www.myspace.com/sightthrusound
PT User is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th May 2006   #11
3 + infractions, forum membership suspended.
 
hgen's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 803

What about the M-Audio controller? I've been looking at that for a awhile, must be fully integrated with PT too?
hgen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th May 2006   #12
Moderator
 
TonyBelmont's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: Boston,MA Providence,RI
Posts: 15,929

Command 8...
TonyBelmont is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th May 2006   #13
Lives for gear
 
ddageek's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 2,673

second vote for mackie control simple ! cross compadibility and expandable!
ddageek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th May 2006   #14
Lives for gear
 
HudHudson's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Austin, Texas USofA
Posts: 1,671

Command 8 works great.
HudHudson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th May 2006   #15
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 151

Just picked up a C8 on ebay for $700. Already would hate to work without it.
wolffy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th May 2006   #16
Lives for gear
 
turk sanchez's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Austin
Posts: 960

Thread Starter
Thanks for the tips guys. The Digi C8 looks to be the best I guess...nobody likes the Tascam and I am not too keen on the idea of getting a Mackie...The C8 and oo2r would be a pretty sweet little rig. I am using the converters on my Rumour for tracking/clocking. The Rumour sounds a lot better than the 002's a/d.

PT user...I was using volume automation to dip out ess's...It was an acoustic track with a female vocal...the sound of the fader moving sounds just like an "ess"...was kind of a distraction. My Lacie drive is too loud as well...I mix turned way down.
turk sanchez is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Digi 002R vs Digi 002 Control Surface nickname So much gear, so little time! 13 30th January 2008 06:21 AM
Control Surface Circuitt High end 24 25th January 2007 06:01 PM
Digi 002 Control Surface vs Digi Control 8 + 002 Rack ? bjm007 Music computers 25 17th September 2006 06:46 PM
Does Digi still plan to make a "high end" Control surface? Mind-Over-Midi High end 8 4th November 2003 11:26 PM
New control surface Volodia So much gear, so little time! 4 27th September 2002 12:42 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:23 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.