![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2005 Location: Austin
Posts: 960
Thread Starter | which control surface for my digi 002r?
I am looking at the Tascam us-2400...24 faders and only $799! Also looking at the comand 8...might work better with Pro Tools? Less faders and more money. Also the Mackie control universal...but this is last on my list. I have mixed on the Pro Control and the noise from the faders moving was a little much at times...so that is a concern. I would like to hear opinions from people who own/use these units. The Tascam seems like the best deal...just wondering how it gels with pro Tools. I am on an Imac g5 (not Intel-mac) and running Pro Tools 6.9. Thanks in advance. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear maniac Joined: May 2006
Posts: 256
|
command 8 it'll always work. plus - does the trashcan unit have track names? me thinks not. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear nut Joined: Mar 2006 Location: Down Under
Posts: 86
|
ummmmmm.... I think there is already "manny" similar threads why don't you do a search.. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Jai guru deva om Joined: Feb 2003 Location: South Carolina
Posts: 12,259
|
Command 8... War |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Jan 2004 Location: Outer New York
Posts: 205
| Well, here's something different...
Consider a used Roland VS-2480. It works great as a control surface, in banks of 8 at a time. In addition, it'll give you a very good all-in-one recorder with lots of inputs, and it's well-suited for remote recording, too. Best of all, it's extremely reliable, so you can always have a backup way to record if your PT rig should stumble at a critical time. The 2480 can export your tracks as wav files, which you can then load into PT LE for further work. The process is a bit cumbersome, but hey...it works!
|
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2004 Location: Charlotte N.C.
Posts: 1,092
|
If you are using PT get the C/8. The integration is much better than the other options. Been using one since it came out and I love it. I would hate to go without it. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear |
Ya, I say stick to Digi's command 8 if you don't already have a controller or can't find a cheap used 3rd party controller. I think Digi tried to weed out the Mackie Control with, I think 6.4(was it?). Where they didn't include the controller patch in the software. They put it in the "UNSUPPORTED" folder. There was sooooo many posts on DUC. I guess they wanted you to buy their own hardware. Shit, they might try it again soon..
|
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,008
|
I tried to use the us2400............ SUCKS with PT! Always had to restart sessions and froze.... just a mess when you are in the zone! |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,424
| Quote:
__________________ Steve There are two kinds of light — the glow that illumines, and the glare that obscures. — James Thurber | |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Sep 2004 Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 289
|
A vote for Mackie Control here, for the simple reason if or when I choose to run a different DAW based program the mackie will most likely have the capability to be used as my controller. Unlike the Command 8 (pt only). As far as noisy faders....well these have gotten a workout over the yrs (3yrs now) I've owned it and never have a had a problem. All faders work fine with no problems. It makes me wonder what a noisy fader would sound like? When mixing even at low levels the movement of a faders wouldnt distract me from the song. I cant imagine a fader moving being that loud. Im glad I havent experienced with the Mackie Control. Peace Eddie |
| | |
| | #11 |
| 3 + infractions, forum membership suspended. Joined: May 2004 Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 803
|
What about the M-Audio controller? I've been looking at that for a awhile, must be fully integrated with PT too?
|
| | |
| | #12 |
| Moderator Joined: Feb 2004 Location: Boston,MA Providence,RI
Posts: 15,929
|
Command 8...
|
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2005 Location: Kansas City
Posts: 2,673
|
second vote for mackie control simple ! cross compadibility and expandable!
|
| | |
| | #14 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2004 Location: Austin, Texas USofA
Posts: 1,671
|
Command 8 works great.
|
| | |
| | #15 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Sep 2004 Location: Chicago
Posts: 151
|
Just picked up a C8 on ebay for $700. Already would hate to work without it.
|
| | |
| | #16 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2005 Location: Austin
Posts: 960
Thread Starter |
Thanks for the tips guys. The Digi C8 looks to be the best I guess...nobody likes the Tascam and I am not too keen on the idea of getting a Mackie...The C8 and oo2r would be a pretty sweet little rig. I am using the converters on my Rumour for tracking/clocking. The Rumour sounds a lot better than the 002's a/d. PT user...I was using volume automation to dip out ess's...It was an acoustic track with a female vocal...the sound of the fader moving sounds just like an "ess"...was kind of a distraction. My Lacie drive is too loud as well...I mix turned way down. |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Digi 002R vs Digi 002 Control Surface | nickname | So much gear, so little time! | 13 | 30th January 2008 06:21 AM |
| Control Surface | Circuitt | High end | 24 | 25th January 2007 06:01 PM |
| Digi 002 Control Surface vs Digi Control 8 + 002 Rack ? | bjm007 | Music computers | 25 | 17th September 2006 06:46 PM |
| Does Digi still plan to make a "high end" Control surface? | Mind-Over-Midi | High end | 8 | 4th November 2003 11:26 PM |
| New control surface | Volodia | So much gear, so little time! | 4 | 27th September 2002 12:42 AM |
| |