Login / Register
 
Using a mixer with built in fx as fx send? Worth it or not?
New Reply
Subscribe
mikeyrad
Thread Starter
#1
21st January 2012
Old 21st January 2012
  #1
Lives for gear
 
mikeyrad's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: CLE
Posts: 523

Thread Starter
mikeyrad is offline
Using a mixer with built in fx as fx send? Worth it or not?

I have a soundcraft mfxi I think it is and it has built in lexicon fx.

Would it be good to send say a vox track to it for verbs?

Has anyone done this with any other boards not boxes as a hardware unit with good results?

How do the built in fx compare to the real thing?

I have not had a chance to try it yet so that's why I'm askin.
__________________
[FONT="Lucida Console"][FONT="Lucida Console"]Mike Radzimski- [COLOR="Green"]FULL LENGTH AUDIO [COLOR="Red"]"Cause Sound Matters!"
#2
21st January 2012
Old 21st January 2012
  #2
Gear Guru
 
theblue1's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 20,258

theblue1 is offline
The 'real thing' like a dedicated digital reverb box? Or the 'real thing' like a plate reverb? Or spring reverb? A reverb chamber? Or... heaven forfend... actually tracking in a physical space with a reverberant ambience?
__________________
.
.

TK Major: social, biz, and music stuff | a crisp, flat design restyle for GS: Gray GS 2.2 for Chrome/Stylebot

People make oceans of music and only a tiny, tiny amount ever rises up for a few moments like a wave, visible from the shore. And then it's gone, too, back into the bottomless sea of forgotten music.
TK Major
. The Forgotify Files
#3
21st January 2012
Old 21st January 2012
  #3
Lives for gear
 
NEWTON IN ORBIT's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 2,347

NEWTON IN ORBIT is offline
If it's what you have, why not use it. I have no clue how the efx sound, but if I had to guess, they are probably like the alex, or lower end mpx series.

Make sure you gain stage for the lowest noise possible, and it will work fine.

Go into the mixer as hot as you can before clipping. Do the same with the efx send. Mix the efx return to taste.

Only one or two added gain stages anyway.

john
mikeyrad
Thread Starter
#4
21st January 2012
Old 21st January 2012
  #4
Lives for gear
 
mikeyrad's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: CLE
Posts: 523

Thread Starter
mikeyrad is offline
Sorry I mean substituting a mixer with built-in effects for a hardware box like a PCM 80 or 90.
#5
21st January 2012
Old 21st January 2012
  #5
Lives for gear
 
NEWTON IN ORBIT's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 2,347

NEWTON IN ORBIT is offline
That's what I meant. I know.

All the above applies.

Whether you are using this with your daw, or another mixer, or both, what I said applies.

john
mikeyrad
Thread Starter
#6
21st January 2012
Old 21st January 2012
  #6
Lives for gear
 
mikeyrad's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: CLE
Posts: 523

Thread Starter
mikeyrad is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by NEWTON IN ORBIT View Post
That's what I meant. I know.

All the above applies.

Whether you are using this with your daw, or another mixer, or both, what I said applies.

john
Thanks man I def wanna try it when I get a chance, just curious to see if it's worth trying too
#7
21st January 2012
Old 21st January 2012
  #7
Gear addict
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Location: Hudson Valley
Posts: 413

manysounds is offline
When it comes to creating sounds nearly everything is worth trying at least once. I mean, unless it costs millions in hours or cash and even then...
Hooking up outboard gear you already own? 15 minutes of your time for a sonic experiment? Why not!!!!!!
#8
22nd January 2012
Old 22nd January 2012
  #8
Gear Guru
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 15,110

joeq is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyrad View Post
Sorry I mean substituting a mixer with built-in effects for a hardware box like a PCM 80 or 90.
The built in verb is supposed to use the same chip as in the MX-400 which is not a PCM-90, but is not a bad verb, either. One thing to keep in mind is that one dedicated reverb unit like a PCM-90 costs as much as your whole mixer including the built in FX. You don't always get what you pay for but quite often you do.

Give it a try but see if you can A/B with some other options, be they a hardware verb or a high-end reverb plug-in.
__________________
.

“What you ask about is music. What you like is sound. Now music and sound are akin, but they are not the same.”
— Confucius
mrc
#9
24th January 2012
Old 24th January 2012
  #9
mrc
Gear addict
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 375

mrc is offline
it also depends on the quality of your convertors.

Sent from my MB525 using Gearslutz.com
New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn  Submit Thread to Google+ Google+ 
 
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter / Forum
Replies
jsteiger / So much gear, so little time!
10
nomraun / Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording
54
azzzy / Low End Theory
16
Corran / Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording
43
stereobot / So much gear, so little time!
27

Forum Jump

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.