![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear interested Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 29
Thread Starter | Adam A7X vs A8X
Has anybody used these two monitors since the port issues have been fixed? I'm looking at the A7Xs for my first pair of medium-price nearfield monitors, upgrading from KRK Rokit 5s (yeah, yuck...). I'm recording via DI/VI in a small bedroom, minimal treatment (which is on the to do list this winter/spring). The A7Xs are awesome. I've heard them, read reviews, and priced for the budget. But, I've seen some online opinions say the A8Xa are a huge improvement in sound, although less midrange focused. It seems like a lot of the comparisons and questions online were asked earlier in production, when the A8Xs had some port problems, which have been fixed. Unfortunately, there's no A8Xs around here. It's a medium-sized, but somewhat remote city with limited in-store products. So, has anybody had enough experience to form an opinion on the A7Xs and A8Xs? I'm wondering if 8.5" is way too much sound for a small bedroom, not to mention the higher price. I'm willing to pay it if there's significant improvement over the A7Xs, but I would really prefer to stay within the Adam family, since I know for a fact the A7Xs are a good choice for me. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2007 Location: Germany
Posts: 1,615
|
I demoed the A7X and A8X side by side about a year ago and decided to go for the A7X for pretty much the reasons you already said. The A8X sounded really great, but to me they sounded TOO great ;-). They have an impressive bass response and lack some mids, which lead to their impressive sound. I don't think that this sound is very good for getting an honest respresentation of my mixes and feared that my mixes will turn out with too much mids, because I would compensate for their sound. The bass response needs a big and well treated room. That said, for what I know about your room situation, the A7X's will be the better choice. If you then move to a bigger or better treated room, you can add a subwoofer afterwards, if you find the bass response not big enough.
__________________ Too many options kill creativity. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Jul 2008 Location: London/Bangkok
Posts: 174
|
+1 I shot out three pairs of speakers recently in a room only slightly bigger than yours, though well treated. A8X mids not good, and the low end, although initially impressive, seemed quite woolly. I bought K&H o300s, by the way. Perhaps not a fair comparison at twice the price, but I also referenced them against my old Genelec 8030s, and thought I'd probably get better mixes on those too.
__________________ http://www.eyeseesound.com/soundproduction.html |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear interested Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 7
|
i'm using a7x for 6 months now, extremely happy with them. as stated above a8x indeed sound too good for studio monitors, and a7x are more natural, that's why i picked them
|
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2008 Location: Canada, B.C.
Posts: 980
|
Getting the A8x with an additional pair that is more mid fwd (different brand) might be a good idea as well . I like having 2 drastically different sounding speakers when I mix . Extra bass would be great so one doesn't mix in too much low end . I found that to be my initial problem before i got my speakers figured out .
__________________ The Ultimate Metal Sample Replacement Kit in Trigger and Drumagog format www.invictusaudio.com |
| | |