![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 217
Thread Starter | Tons of Summing Mixer Options
Some have very few or no buttons others have more features than a real mixer. And the price range is from $1000 Folcrom to $3800 SPL Mix-Dream. Isn’t the whole idea of a summing mixer is to “do all in the box” and "simply sum the busses"? Why have all the expensive bells and whistles if the box is integrated into a patchbay? Just curious? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear nut Joined: Jan 2004 Location: Canada
Posts: 128
|
Summing rack mixers are a quickly dying transitional fad. Don't bother with them! We are on our way back to using Mixing boards just like everyone used to. I still can't figure out why everyone got rid of their analog mixers. They always make a better mix then any other device. That's why they call a mixing board, a mixing board. No one I know has ever called their personal computer a mixing board. Mixing is for Mixing boards, effects are for effects processors, computers are for storing and retreiving and editing data. Mixing is a musical engagement, performed by a mixing engineer with the right tools which include a mixing board. Computer programmers/editors cannot mix music because they are not mixing engineers and they don't know how to use mixing boards. Just like drummers don't know how to play guitar the way guitarist do because they don't own or play a guitar unless they are both of these things. If you are a mixing engineer than surely you must use a mixing board as without one you cannot consider yourself to be a mixing engineer. A mixing engineer's most important tool is a mixing board. If you were a butcher...would you carve up those cows with a Pentium 4 or a butcher's knife? |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,075
|
And throw away the benefits of track and effects automation? I don't think so. Control surfaces give you a fader in your hands, if that makes you feel better. |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2004 Location: mexico
Posts: 4,959
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Apr 2005 Location: Australia
Posts: 217
|
Yes, the main benefits beside running through so many analog circuits is the routing on a console. If you're using mults on say a kick and you want 3 tracks, you can do it many ways with a console and only use one converter output, but on a summer you need 3 outputs or a patchbay with parallels in it. I guess it depends on how you prefer to mix hey.
__________________ "It's got tubes?.......Tubes of what?" - My dad |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2004 Location: mexico
Posts: 4,959
| Quote:
i like my ITB + analog rig better, and have become too used to being able to switch songs at the snap of a finger. guess that's why they say the grass is always greener... | |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| MonsterIsland.com Joined: Sep 2005 Location: New York City
Posts: 4,233
| Quote:
Also, the next generation will have some hybrid functions. Say 16 faders and 16 virtual faders on a touch sensitive LCD screen that will replace your montir and be used for editing as well. Without making a judgement, summing via math and summing via electricity passing over wires and mashing all together is different and part of the reason that I think you are right in believing that we will not be limited mixing in the box. | |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2006 Location: London
Posts: 1,434
| Quote:
But everyone's situation is different, and I'm sure some people would argue that level control is more important than pan. | |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2006 Location: London
Posts: 1,434
| Quote:
For me, I'm selling my Mackie Desk because I always have about 50 tunes on the go at once and its too much hassle to reset the levels all the time. But I don't like mixing entirely ITB, so I have a few high quality analogue processors and a summing amp to mix with. When I can afford an SSL AWS900 I'll buy one, but until then I don't think reverting to another mid-priced console will help my situation. | |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear addict Joined: Aug 2003 Location: Liberty, TX
Posts: 437
|
Before long, programs like Sonar will have "virtual analog mix busses" modeled (ie SSL, Neve) and analog summers will be a thing of the past. e |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2004 Location: mexico
Posts: 4,959
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,701
| http://www.gearslutz.com/board/showt...835#post699835 take a listen to track 3, it was done with a Folcrom and Trident S20.
__________________ Steven Slate Hear drum samples used by today's top mixers and used on tons of top billboard hits at: www.stevenslatedrums.com SSD Drum Suite now Available for DOWNLOAD!! 40 WORLD CLASS DRUMKITS FOR RTAS/VST/AU www.slatedigital.com DOWNLOAD NEW TRIGGER DEMO! www.slateproaudio.com |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2005 Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 1,176
| Quote:
This is quite true. I'm not sure if you were being facetious, but I would be willing to bet that this will happen within the next few years.
__________________ "Some of you people just plain don't know s---. No offense." -theblue1 "Tell us if it looks like it will sound good." -RKrizman "The many truths we cling to depend greatly on our point of view." -Obi-Wan Kenobi | |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2004 Location: Orlando
Posts: 3,686
|
The Phoenix and the Chandler are probably at the top of the summing heap.
|
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,433
| Quote:
-Duardo | |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| Gear maniac Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 278
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,433
|
Whoops, yes, I'm sorry, I wasn't paing close attention and when I saw the word "Phoenix" I associated it with Cranesong but was actually thinking about the Spider. Sorry about that. Still, interesting that both of those plugins come from companies known for their analog gear. -Duardo |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Chandler Limited Mini Rack Mixer as Summing Mixer | siloo | High end | 18 | 16th January 2009 06:19 PM |
| Would you suggest a Summing Mixer or just a Mixer? | rids | Low End Theory | 0 | 9th August 2006 02:56 PM |
| Summing n bussing options | jayjay | High end | 2 | 26th April 2006 07:45 PM |
| Dual purpose mixer options | mpzdrummer | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 1 | 5th March 2006 08:35 PM |
| Summing options: Manley mixer or D2B | Shaman | High end | 61 | 1st September 2004 09:42 AM |
| |