Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!


New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 24th March 2006   #1
Lives for gear
 
AdamJay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 2,825

Thread Starter
SM57 Mod in the new TapeOP

anyone tried this?

basically you take it apart, boil the half of the mic with the tranny in it (to loosen the glue that holds it in), remove the tranny and rewire.

result has more low end, though 10dB less output. (hey, free pad!)

i'd like to hear some other opinions of this mod before i butcher one of me 57's
__________________
AdamJay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th March 2006   #2
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 9

april edition per chance?
The Fifth Flaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th March 2006   #3
Lives for gear
 
AdamJay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 2,825

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fifth Flaw
april edition per chance?
yes, just came in today.
Mar/Apr 2006 Edition.

interesting review of the API 2500 comp in there too.
AdamJay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th March 2006   #4
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 632

I saw it, thought about the 58 I have for sale right now and then realized the other places I could get a better return on my time. Looks cool though, actually sounds as if it made it a better mic.

Tape Op rules. I read my first one when it was almost xeroxed and a strange size. They were way into Radio Shack PZMs (or so I thought--of course I started asking about dead stock at every RS I went into). Somehow they've managed to keep that home grown feel even though they're now talking about $4K mics. An inspiration.
ALL*MYTEE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th March 2006   #5
Gear Head
 
keithrt99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Vallejo, CA, USA
Posts: 66

a guy on harmony central did it. it sounds much bassier.
http://acapella.harmony-central.com/...readid=1199630
keithrt99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th March 2006   #6
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 12

Why not just get Audix i-5?
Sven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th March 2006   #7
Jai guru deva om
 
warhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 11,906

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sven
Why not just get Audix i-5?


The i5 will still walk the dog on the 57 across other parts of the frequency spectrum as well.

A buddy of mine however did remove the transformers from his 57's and liked the result.

War
__________________
Warren Dent - Owner of:
www.ZenProAudio.com

Where You Get Gear Now & Zen

Email via Gearslutz

warhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th March 2006   #8
Lives for gear
 
TornadoTed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wales
Posts: 1,408

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fifth Flaw
april edition per chance?
That's what I was thinking!
TornadoTed is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 25th March 2006   #9
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: beautiful Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 9,358

That trick is older than dirt. It was done in the 70's. Use good wire, I use military surplus silver teflon wire.

Audio is like fashion, everything comes around again.

Jim Williams
Audio Upgrades
Jim Williams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th March 2006   #10
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New York City
Posts: 715

i did it- took about 15 minutes. indeed, more bottom end, and a more even freq. response in general. seems like it would work better in some situations, whenever you didn't want the usual extreme amount of nasal tone.
57s are tough with a digital medium. much better with tape.
so if you've got a few lying around, it's certainly worth it.
david lawrence
beats workin' is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2006   #11
Lives for gear
 
mixerguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,963

anyone else done it?
mixerguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2006   #12
Lives for gear
 
Drumsound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Bloomington Il
Posts: 5,026

I think I'm gonna try it. maybe then I'll find the 57 useful...
__________________
Tony
Oxide Lounge Recording
See the Oxide Lounge!
Follow me on TWITTER!

WWJMD?

Come see me on the Tape Op boards!

It's only inches on the reel to reel
Drumsound is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2006   #13
Lives for gear
 
pigpen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Athens, GA- US
Posts: 2,322

Yea screw it....lets check it out!
pigpen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2006   #14
Lives for gear
 
rainsinvelvet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: California
Posts: 1,195

I plan on trying it out this weekend. I've got 8 sm57's that just sit in there pouch waiting to be usefull on something. Maybe this will be the ticket

ERic
__________________
It is a very mixed blessing to be brought back from the dead.
Kurt Vonnegut
rainsinvelvet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2006   #15
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: beautiful Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 9,358

Here's another monkey wrench for ya, the current crop of Mexican 57's sound nothing like the classic American made Unidyne III models. Those older ones, if you can find a clean one, have much better top end clarity than the Mexican 57's.
The Mexican models sound nasel next to a clean Unidyne III model.

Question is: do you want to change a classic mic that's no longer made?

Jim Williams
Audio Upgrades
Jim Williams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2006   #16
500 series nutjob
 
pan60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 500 series Guru SKANK! ; )
Posts: 10,749

Send a message via Skype™ to pan60
Quote:
Originally Posted by warhead


The i5 will still walk the dog on the 57 across other parts of the frequency spectrum as well.

A buddy of mine however did remove the transformers from his 57's and liked the result.

War
i have been really liking the Audix om-2
pan60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2006   #17
Lives for gear
 
everybody's x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: kansas city
Posts: 1,618

Well thats exactly what I did, I had an old dead 545 (I have 8 all together) I prefer them to the 57.

I took the tranny out of the dead one and soldered in solid core wire. Initial run through; it is way more bassy, similar to my rca ribbon.

I am considering putting my old tranny into the newer 57 I have


I am planning on cutting some samples and posting them compared to the original 545 and a 57

I'm thinking

snare
guitar
vox
and a kick just for well....kicks

suggestions?



edit; as a tribute to War (and so I could tell which mic was which) I painted it blue
__________________
Dave
everybody's x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2006   #18
Lives for gear
 
Brad McGowan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 5,522

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Williams
Here's another monkey wrench for ya, the current crop of Mexican 57's sound nothing like the classic American made Unidyne III models. Those older ones, if you can find a clean one, have much better top end clarity than the Mexican 57's.
The Mexican models sound nasel next to a clean Unidyne III model.
This has been my experience as well. The newer models are different sounding indeed.

Brad
Brad McGowan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2006   #19
Lives for gear
 
Tibbon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Boston/MA
Posts: 4,774

Send a message via AIM to Tibbon Send a message via Skype™ to Tibbon
Does it work on a 58? I have a 58 that something in it was killed by a water leak and a mixture with phantom power. Removing some parts like this does,... might make it work again?
Tibbon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2006   #20
Lives for gear
 
NathanEldred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: West Coast Central Florida
Posts: 7,126

Send a message via AIM to NathanEldred
I'd like to hear it with the Lundahl output. But I definitely wouldn't want to have an SM57 padded 10db, it's already low enough.
__________________
Nathan Eldred
Visit Atlas Pro Audio
USA Distributor for Buzz Audio
Atlas Recording Studios, Inc.
NathanEldred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2006   #21
Lives for gear
 
everybody's x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: kansas city
Posts: 1,618

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tibbon
Does it work on a 58? I have a 58 that something in it was killed by a water leak and a mixture with phantom power. Removing some parts like this does,... might make it work again?
yes, provided the capsule itself still works
everybody's x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th April 2006   #22
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: beautiful Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 9,358

Quote:
Originally Posted by NathanEldred
I'd like to hear it with the Lundahl output. But I definitely wouldn't want to have an SM57 padded 10db, it's already low enough.
Probably wouldn't work correctly. The 57's coil is 12 ohms impedance. Not 150 ohms.

Jim Williams
Audio Upgrades
Jim Williams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th April 2006   #23
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Inside the Outside
Posts: 1,195

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamJay
boil the half of the mic with the tranny in it...remove the tranny and rewire...result has more low end, though 10dB less output...
LOL. Well, yes you can boil up your 57s.

Or on the other hand, you could just use a different mic that has more bass and a 10db pad to start with.
DeepSpace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th April 2006   #24
Lives for gear
 
AdamJay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 2,825

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkSky
LOL. Well, yes you can boil up your 57s.

Or on the other hand, you could just use a different mic that has more bass and a 10db pad to start with.
i think you are missing the point.
AdamJay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th April 2006   #25
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 159

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Williams
Here's another monkey wrench for ya, the current crop of Mexican 57's sound nothing like the classic American made Unidyne III models. Those older ones, if you can find a clean one, have much better top end clarity than the Mexican 57's.
The Mexican models sound nasel next to a clean Unidyne III model.

Question is: do you want to change a classic mic that's no longer made?

Jim Williams
Audio Upgrades
I've got 3 Unidynes I will definately NOT boil.

So is this the reason the new Mexican Shures suck, the transformers are not as good?
twotracker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th April 2006   #26
Jai guru deva om
 
warhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 11,906

Quote:
Originally Posted by everybody's x
edit; as a tribute to War (and so I could tell which mic was which) I painted it blue
Mustang blue?

War
warhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th April 2006   #27
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: beautiful Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 9,358

Quote:
Originally Posted by twotracker
I've got 3 Unidynes I will definately NOT boil.

So is this the reason the new Mexican Shures suck, the transformers are not as good?
No, it's the capsule. I asked a Shure engineer about it in 1990. He said the dies and stampers were old and sent to Mexico. Anyone who remembers doing records back in the 70's would know about worn stampers.

Jim Williams
Audio Upgrades
Jim Williams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th April 2006   #28
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: East Bay, CA
Posts: 520

Call me crazee but,
I like that I know what to expect from a 57. If I need a mic quick during setup
I know what it'll do and how it will react. The last thing I'd want is to throw it up
and go - what the hell,where's all this low end coming from or why the heck is this signal so weak!?!.

I guess what I'm saying is, if I want a 57 I want it to be what it is because it's a solution I am familiar with and I can spend my thoughts on placement while eliminating an unknown variable. If I want something different, then I'll grab it. But I don't want to get fooled by some secret modded 57 during setup and get bit in the ass because of it.

So I'm calling on all modded 57's to come with huge labels. Stickers, color coded zip ties anything - but please mark those bastards.
__________________
peace and balance
Chris
wavetrap
wavcatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th April 2006   #29
Lives for gear
 
Brad McGowan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 5,522

Or you could just use your ears, listen to what's coming through the monitors, and adjust from there.

Brad
Brad McGowan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th April 2006   #30
Lives for gear
 
Bat Head Sound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 585

Quote:
Originally Posted by NathanEldred
I'd like to hear it with the Lundahl output. But I definitely wouldn't want to have an SM57 padded 10db, it's already low enough.
Yeah, but then you could use it to mic up a nuclear explosion, wouldn't that be fun...
Bat Head Sound is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tapeop Con 06.. djui5 Product Alerts older than 2 months 2 7th December 2005 05:26 PM
TapeOp t-shirts everybody's x Product Alerts older than 2 months 3 19th October 2005 07:50 PM
TapeOp conference,anybody going? Saucyjack High end 21 17th June 2005 05:06 PM
tapeop forum lhaile So much gear, so little time! 0 22nd February 2005 11:45 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:59 AM.

 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com Limited - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office: 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.