![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #61 |
| Gear interested | Ok, this translates a little clearer to me now. When you said the "sound quality was crap" I was thinking that you were craving more of a hi-fi/clean approach. Sounds like perhaps they just didn't nail the authentic old school sound for you? I still like it for the throwback vibe but with some modern touches. At least we both like the song!
|
| | |
| | #62 |
| Gear interested Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3
| Adele Vocal Chain
It's obvious just looking from the Music Video that she is using the infamous Vintage Telefunken ELA-M251. It's a hands down because you don't just borrow a $30,000 mic just to show a couple seconds of it on a Promo Music Video.
|
| | |
| | #63 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2011 Location: Houston
Posts: 512
|
What the hell are you people talking about? The mix sounds phenomenal. The recording didnt, on the other hand. And I know this because I applied the reverse of what the Tom Elmhirst provided in the article on a set of stems I found and I can conclusively say he slayed that mix.
__________________ http://soundcloud.com/drahcirsaag/quorra |
| | |
| | #64 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2007 Location: UK
Posts: 9,574
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #65 |
| Gear maniac Joined: May 2009
Posts: 181
| |
| | |
| | #66 |
| Gear interested Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1
|
Re Adele's mikes for 21, my own guess is Neumann U87's, which I've used extensively on instrumental and vocal studio projects, because they're so natural sounding. Then I saw a post on another GS forum, which perhaps lends support to the Neumann theory: Adele picked up a package of Neumann and Sennheiser mics for her major UK tour late last year. Commenting on her Neumann KMS 105 vocal mic at that time, Adele’s front-of-house engineer, Dave McDonald, said, “It takes the vocal and really throws it to the back of the hall with clarity. When I started working with Adele I said, ‘let’s get you one of these, a) for health reasons, because you need your own microphone and b) it’s the right mic for your vocal’. The KMS 105 just has this depth. It goes right to the bottom and the high-end of the vocal and it’s crystal clear. That’s what I always want. I don’t want to be messing around for ages EQ-ing a vocal when I can just put a really good mic on it.” |
| | |
| | #67 |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2007 Location: UK
Posts: 9,574
|
i hear it was Rode mic's.
|
| | |
| | #68 |
| Gear Head Joined: Dec 2007 Location: London UK
Posts: 66
|
+1 rode
|
| | |
| | #69 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 245
| |
| | |
| | #70 | |
| MonsterIsland.com Joined: Sep 2005 Location: New York City
Posts: 4,233
| Quote:
Yes, mics will sound different when you A/B them. If you do it without the track playing you'll find that the tone is different because of all of the frequency masking that happens. What makes it through the mix EQ on the vocal, the masking and the mastering is not going to be as different as you think. A singer's performance is going to create some level of emotional response in the listener. If it's minimal, then it doesn't matter, they're not going to listen again. If it's extremely intense, they're not going to notice the tone. Do worry about the dynamics. The closer someone is to the mic, the more extreme the contrast in the dynamics, which you don't want. If you have a mic with a lot of proximity effect, you can keep them further away and the dynamics will be far more natural - people don't sing an inch from your ear. As far as signal processing, I like to have a little peak limiting in front of some compression. When you're setting levels, the peak limiter shouldn't move. When the sing for real, they're going to sing louder even if they claim to have sung their loudest. The compression should be slow in both attack and release. Use the lowest ratio possible (I've been using 1.2:1 quite a bit on a lot of things). The lower the ratio, the smoother the closing and opening of the compressor. It's fine to set the threshold low, but it's also ok to not compress enough for the final mix, you can always add more later. Even when you know exactly what you're doing, you can't control what the singer does that can result in your settings being wrong. I prefer recording full length performances. Many people work on verses and choruses separately. I'll almost always drop the input level of the pre by 5dB for the choruses when recording this way. It helps avoid clipping and too much compression. Dynamics do more for the feeling of a recording than anything else. More than tone and more than timing. Truly natural dynamics are rarely right for a recording, so you have to control them and leave enough that the performer can control the feeling, or you have to create them in the mix out of a flat performance which is never as good. | |
| | |
| | #71 |
| Gear nut Joined: Jan 2011 Location: Tilburg, the Netherlands
Posts: 125
|
About vocal chain for Adele's "21", Universal Audio's FB page just posted this article! Producer of the Year Paul Epworth on Adele, Cee Lo, Foster the People - Blog - Universal Audio |
| | |
| | #72 |
| Gear interested Joined: May 2010
Posts: 10
|
Rode classic 2 through UA 6176
|
| | |