Beyerdynamic M 69 TG - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!


Beyerdynamic M 69 TG

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 16th March 2006   #1
Lives for gear
 
Mixocalypse's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 674

Thread Starter
Beyerdynamic M 69 TG

Anyone using the M 69 TG ?
what are you using it on ?
how does it compare to the M88TG
__________________
Pete
Static Productions
Mixocalypse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th November 2011   #2
Lives for gear
 
turk sanchez's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Austin
Posts: 960

old thread...trying to figure this out myself. I already read everything on this sight

I owned an m88 and sold it...it was cool but I found the mid (around 1k) to sound a bit "hard" if you will. I know there isn't a peak there but the tone to me in that area stood out in a weird way to me. How similar are these mics in tone (m88 and m69)? Is it just that the m88 goes deeper in the bass or do they sound different overall? I really like Beyer mics.

I am interested in another dynamic mic for vocals cut at home in an apartment. I already have an sm7, 635a, i5 and a pair of mc930s. I record rock mostly and use an ma5 and vp26 preamps along w/my harrison EQ and hairball 1176 rev d into a duet and logic. My ear hates any trace of sibilance. I like the mics I have...I would just like a nice flavor to compliment them. I pretty much use my other mics for other things and want another dynamic for vocals. I have owned in the past u195, umt70s, 4047, m88 ~ the one I miss of those is the umt70s but I think a LDC in an apartment is a pain (turn off the fridge and ac haha).

Thanks...any general opinions would be nice. I might try and buy tomorrow on a black Friday sale. Happy Thanksgiving.
__________________
DannyStapleton.com
turk sanchez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th November 2011   #3
Lives for gear
 
Aisle 6's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,233

The M69TG is a great live vocal mic. You do not see a lot of them around though. I have used them on instruments in a pinch. However, it was always easy to use on vocals. No instant, WOW!, just really solid on almost every vocal I have tried it on.
__________________
[url]

www.aisle6.com.au
Aisle 6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th November 2011   #4
Gear nut
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 81

I have the older M69n(c) model as well as the newer M88 TG and I personally prefer the M69, "especially" on acoustic guitar. Just sounds more natural to me as opposed to the "hyper boosted" sound of the 88.
Louis Alexis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th November 2011   #5
Lives for gear
 
turk sanchez's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Austin
Posts: 960

thanks for the feedback...anybody else got any input? Would appreciate it...might roll the dice and just try one. I can get one new for $220 tomorrow.
turk sanchez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th November 2011   #6
Gear addict
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 361

FWIW , I have used both many years ago and my thoughts were that the 69 was a "poor man's 88" - If you have the loot, one to go for IMO is the Sennheiser 441- quality all the way.
Cheers, Ross
reddirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th November 2011   #7
Lives for gear
 
turk sanchez's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Austin
Posts: 960

I have never tried a 441...would LOVE to, but it's a bit pricey (more than I want to spend). I should have mentioned, I am going to fly out of town and take my duet to record some overdubs w/a client in San Diego and I would like like to take a couple dynamics that are small in size...so my sm7 is staying home. The 635a is a little lean in the bottom for this project (vocals). I'll take my i5 but wanted something else to try. I'll most likely re-process (bounce) the tracks back through my ma5 (line in) and 1176 when I get back to Texas.

Thanks for the ideas guys...open to other suggestions as well...and I spent 2 nights reading just about every thread on this subject. Considered the re16 but I like proximity effect. Thanks for the input.
turk sanchez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th November 2011   #8
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 975

If it's vocals you are after mostly, maybe check out the Telefunken M80 or maybe one of the Heil mics. I use the M80 for location recording all the time and it works really well. The only other thing I've recorded with it is snare and it worked pretty well.
edwinhurwitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th November 2011   #9
Lives for gear
 
turk sanchez's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Austin
Posts: 960

I have used the m80 for snare and it sounded great..."pre-EQ'd" with a lot of top...so it may be too bright for what I am looking for (but maybe not...have not tried it on vocals). Have used the pro 40 too...it's cool but not exactly what I want (again...it's big and I want a compact mic for a few reasons: traveling, and also easy to place in tight spots).

I might just try the m 69 for giggles...thanks again for the feedback!
turk sanchez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th November 2011   #10
Lives for gear
 
Aisle 6's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,233

Quote:
Originally Posted by reddirt View Post
FWIW , I have used both many years ago and my thoughts were that the 69 was a "poor man's 88" - If you have the loot, one to go for IMO is the Sennheiser 441- quality all the way.
Cheers, Ross
I would not even compare the M69 and M88 as they really are two totally different purpose mics. Live vocals is where the M69 does well. Whereas M88...well where hasn't it been used.

441 is awesome, but I would not use it live, only for the studio that one. IO own all three and would agree for studio work.
Aisle 6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th November 2011   #11
Lives for gear
 
turk sanchez's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Austin
Posts: 960

Thanks, Aisle 6! Do you like the m69 for vocal recording at all? Can you compare it sonically to the m88? Thanks for your time. You own all 3 so your input is valuable to me. Appreciate it
turk sanchez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th November 2011   #12
Lives for gear
 
AnthonyRochester's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: somewhere in Tasmania
Posts: 1,263

I believe the M69 was designed for really close miking of guitar cabs/instruments etc, that's why its so flat on top, to get the diaphragm very close to the outside.
__________________
http://www.pricklepad.com
AnthonyRochester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2011   #13
Lives for gear
 
Aisle 6's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,233

Quote:
Originally Posted by turk sanchez View Post
Thanks, Aisle 6! Do you like the m69 for vocal recording at all? Can you compare it sonically to the m88? Thanks for your time. You own all 3 so your input is valuable to me. Appreciate it
Never tried it for vocal recording. I am spoiled for choice. I like it live as the proximity effect is less apparent than say a 58.
Aisle 6 is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Beyerdynamic MC740? dalley High end 5 18th January 2006 01:36 PM
Beyerdynamic m201tg Nu-tra Low End Theory 14 16th November 2005 06:06 PM
Beyerdynamic mc 930 Nu-tra Low End Theory 0 29th October 2005 07:13 PM
beyerdynamic m69 lowswing So much gear, so little time! 2 12th August 2003 05:19 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:29 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.