All Advertisers
| All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
 New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
23rd February 2006
| #1 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2006 Location: Southern California
Posts: 660
Thread Starter | 512 KB Cache Vs. 1MB
Two G5s, both dual processor 2GHz. One of them has 512 KB cache, and the other one has 1KB. Does it matter? One's cheaper. Thanks, Mychal |
|  |
|
23rd February 2006
| #2 |
| Gear addict  |
Yes....it matters. On die/full speed cache...assuming it's full speed...is ALWAYS better in larger quantities. Get the 512k. Especially if your not going to be using some sort of plug-in dsp card. ie: protools-core/tc powercore. |
|
| |
|
23rd February 2006
| #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2006 Location: Southern California
Posts: 660
Thread Starter | Oops
Oops! My bad. I meant 512 KB vs. 1MB. Good grief. I can't even type. Thanks, Mychal |
|
| |
|
23rd February 2006
| #4 |
| Gear addict |
I was thinking...1k sounds odd?  1MB sounds good |
|
| |
|
23rd February 2006
| #5 | |
| Lives for gear  Joined: Aug 2004 Location: tx
Posts: 8,802
| Quote:
| |
|
| |
New Reply 
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Disk Cache Problem | Alex_M | Music computers | 4 | 18th August 2006 12:32 AM |
| 10000rpm v 7500rpm with 16 meg cache | keep it reel | Music computers | 9 | 24th August 2005 06:35 PM |
| Hard drive Cache? | guitarbth | Music computers | 3 | 5th April 2005 06:31 PM |
| Pentium 4 w/bigger cache better ? | lukejs | Music computers | 5 | 28th September 2004 02:05 PM |
| |
