![]() | All Advertisers |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,695
Thread Starter | Synthesizers and such Hi all. So I want to learn a little about Synthesizers, I have been out of that game for a few years (when I get the chance to play keys it is usually piano or organ now-a-days) and I know things change pretty quickly in that arena. Specifically I am looking for the keyboard sounds that are used in heavier stuff like Nine Inch Nails. What would I look for, what would I stay away from, what is the deal with soft synths vs. hardware etc. Thanks!!!
__________________ Michael |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Barcelona!!
Posts: 1,618
| well Nine" Nails used a ton of synths no? i'm sure there are tons of synth lists for that band... but i always seem to hear a dx-7 in there... metalic slash... oberheims? theres this single space analogue oberheim that pretty cheap.. moogey fuzzy basses... don't care for too many soft synths...because i like toob amps with keys...bla$ting you dig.. |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Gear Guru Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: New York City
Posts: 14,176
| Quote:
Reaktor 5 is by far the coolest and most creative synth/sample program by far. Its also probably one of the most difficult to learn. The synth/fx ensembles that are out there are mind blowing. Trent as well as a lot of different guys use it for sounds. | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,695
Thread Starter | Thanks guys. So call me old school (because I am to a degree) but how do you use soft synths like Reaktor 5? Can they be used in the same computer along side say Samplitude? How do you get the "sounds" out of the soft synth into Samp? Is it better to run a separate computer? In that case I need a whole new set of converters then.... kind of confused here. (I know, I know read up more on the Reaktor 5 site) ![]() Thanks again. |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,695
Thread Starter | Quote:
![]() | |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Gothenburg, Sweden!
Posts: 1,471
| Quote:
Are you going for old analog synths or new? If you are going for new, then look at these: Access Virus (A,B,C or TI) - Can produce a lot of sound - fat sounding - on board effects. Clavia Nord Lead (1,2,3) - Espeacially good at FM modulated wierd sounds - A little thinner sounding then the Virus - no effects. Clavia Nord Modular - Good for everything, but timeconsuming to program. If you are buying old synths the check these out: OSCar - The king of producing aggresive, squeeling sounds. Korg MS20 - Verry good at metallic modulated sounds. Obeheim (2 voice, four voice) - Not a lot of paramaters but the best fatest sound. If you want more info just ask! /Cojo | |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,695
Thread Starter | Thanks Cojo Well like I said I am looking for sounds NIN'ish, is he using older sounds or newer stuff? Also I do have a question about soft synths... Quote:
Thanks again. | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Barcelona!!
Posts: 1,618
| oh and i finally tried out the Dave Smith Evolver... newer version w/keyz...really freaky... i could see getting some good sounds out of that bastard.. and the Matrixs are going for around $300 for keys and much less for the rackmount Matrix 1000.. CHEAP!! |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Barcelona!!
Posts: 1,618
| i would assume you would do it on the same comput0R.... samplitude uses VST? i dunno i would be shocked if it wouldn't work... you won't need 2 compuT0Rs...no way.. |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,695
Thread Starter | Quote:
Yep Samp is VST, I just have no idea how to get the two to work together. *shrug* Does something like Access Virus or Reaktor show up as a plug-in? Really I know allot about computers and allot about recording but when it comes to MIDI and softsynths I am just confused to all hell and back (in fairness to me, I know how MIDI should work but it rarely comes out that way in the wash if ya know what I mean). | |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Gear Guru Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: New York City
Posts: 14,176
| Quote:
You might to if you want to run Reaktor or a Gigasampler. Even though i use a Mac to make music, i have a suped up PC just to run Reaktor,Wavelab and Fruity Loops. Reaktor is a processor hog. If you want to run multiple ensembles it taxes the computer immensely. And yeah you can run it simultaneously with Samplitude. | |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: NYC
Posts: 1,134
| Quote:
They usually have install instructions and yes, when used within an application, they appear just like a plug-in, usually on an auxiliary input. All you need to do is make output assignments (like bussing to a track for printing) and also route MIDI to the plug-in from an external controller.
__________________ "Stop helping God across the road like a little old lady" Stand Up Comedy No Line on the Horizon - U2 | |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,695
Thread Starter | Great guys thanks (even after how long I have been here I am continually surprised how much this place rocks!!). So to combine Thrill's and StoneinaPond's last posts. So it looks like I can use it as a VST plug-in with Samp but something like Reaktor will be pretty hard to use with a large project, that might push the limits of my processor. If that is the case is there any way to "record" the sound of the soft snyth somehow to make it a .wav file and free up some CPU cycles? |
| | |
| | #14 | ||
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: NYC
Posts: 1,134
| Quote:
Quote:
| ||
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Gear Guru Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: New York City
Posts: 14,176
| Quote:
Yeah i am pretty sure you will want to track it. I would probably suggest to get a demo on it. It really is an amazing sonic tool. It will change your view of synths in general. The ensembles out there are amazing. I trade them all the time with people all over the world. Some of the best comes from Europe(where the best Electronica is done). | |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,695
Thread Starter | Quote:
Oooops.... (rubs foot on the ground in front of him) Sorry.... ![]() Yeah that is cool thanks for the info. | |
| | |
| | #17 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,695
Thread Starter | Quote:
Thanks Thrill.... so about how much does Reaktor 5 street for and are the ensembles free to trade (I would assume so but.. you know...). | |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Barcelona!!
Posts: 1,618
| elolver...knobs... knobs help.. makes it easier when you're lit.. |
| | |
| | #19 | |
| Gear Guru Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: New York City
Posts: 14,176
| Quote:
I am not sure what the street price is these days. And yeah you can either trade them or download them off the website. | |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,003
| I'd recommend the Polyevolver Keyboard. It has quite a bit of real analog components in it and it gives it that extra "oomph" that you simply don't get out of a purely digital synth (whether it is a plug-in like Reaktor or a standalone like the Access Virus). Basically the Polyevolver combines components and architecture from two classic Sequential Circuits synths, the Prophet 5 and the Prophet VS. Plus it has a built-in 4-track step sequencer, and some crazy effects that make for real nasty, gritty mayhem (for example there's something called "output hack" which seemingly overdrives the D/A converters to produce a unique digital distortion). As far as digital synths, the Access Virus is probably the best at producing "heavy" sounds, i.e. warm, distorted, punchy stuff. The new Virus Ti is quite cool but you might consider picking up a Virus Classic, which sells for half the price, and while lacking a considerable number of features from the Ti, still delivers the basic sound that has made the Virus popular. The Nord stuff is very clean sounding in a way that strikes me personally as a bit clinical. However, the G2 modular is a pretty amazing system both in terms of software and the brilliant hardware controller they've designed for it. If you're uncomfortable working with plug-ins (and that seems to be the case) you'd probably get more done with a G2 modular than with Reaktor, and you wouldn't have to build a second computer + buy another audio interface. (That said, Reaktor and the G2 sound completely different, with Reaktor better at warmer, dirtier sounds and the G2 more 'pristine'... IMHO). |
| | |
| | #21 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: NYC
Posts: 1,134
| Quote:
As has been mentioned, Reaktor is a hardware hog and depending on your configuration, may give you problems. But it is in many ways the Rolls Royce of synthesizers. And you can build your own "synths" known as the ensembles. Be aware that there are many, many software synthesizers out there. EastWest also do dedicated sample playback instruments that, depending on your style, can provide great sounds. Also look at ilio's Atmosphere, Arturia's emulation of Moog synths and just keep looking. There's a ton out there. | |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Gothenburg, Sweden!
Posts: 1,471
| Reaktor is verry complex, you have to read alot to make use of it properly! If you are going "soft modular" I would suggest Nord Modular G2 as radiospace said. That is a really good and easy synth considering being modular. In cubase a softsynth apear as a midi track, where you do all your midistuff, and as an audio/vst track where you assign your outputs and apply effects and so on. You could render the the whole file and get a wav track if you want to free up cpu power. /Cojo |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,695
Thread Starter | Cool guys, thanks. So how about Minimonsta, any good at doing heavy cool sounding distorted NIN stuff? Also this is going to be a stupid question but what exacly is VSTi? I know the "i" is instrument but what is the deal with it and what does it have to do with soft synths anything? |
| | |
| | #24 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,003
| Quote:
If you don't use Cubase you might not use plug-ins in VST format but it has become, like "Coke" or "Xerox" in their respective fields, shorthand for the general category of DAW plug-ins, so that when someone says VSTi, if you are using a host that supports a different standard (such as Apple's Logic), you understand to not necessarily take it literally, depending on the context. | |
| | |
| | #25 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 524
| Quote:
I don't think reaktor or any of the Native instruments synths really has much to offer, besides ridiculous features you don't need.. expect the FM7 synth, which is kinda cool. I use native intstruments kontakt a bit, cos it's so easy and quick to use, but it really is the worst sounding sampler in the universe. Crap crap crap. | |
| | |
| | #26 | |
| Gear Guru Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: New York City
Posts: 14,176
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #27 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,695
Thread Starter | Quote:
Yeah I already know what VST is and were it came from the "i" is really what I am wondering about. I believe that Samplitude specifically states that they offer VST and VSTi plug in support. They make it sound like different things but I could be wrong, hence the question. You may be right, it might be a home-brew kind of term. Thanks. | |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 14
| http://www.virsyn.de/en/E_Products/E..._minitera.html Cheap, fun, easy to mess with and they have a demo. Not "full featured" but pretty darn cool. The slot machine button is fun for getting random settings. Some of the sounds I've gotten would fit NIN. |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Lives for Jesus Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: orange county ca.
Posts: 2,935
| Should checkout the Roland V synth .......... Super cool !! ![]() |
| | |
| | #30 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,695
Thread Starter | Quote:
| |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Major Cateogories Of Synthesizers | MACHINE | So much gear, so little time! | 9 | 26th April 2006 07:57 AM |
| Sound Quality Wise Are Do You Think Soft Synthesizers and Hard Ware Synthesizers | MACHINE | So much gear, so little time! | 5 | 25th April 2006 01:03 PM |
| What Do You Guys Think Of These 3 Synthesizers | MACHINE | Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production | 4 | 24th April 2006 07:34 PM |
| What Are The Categories Of Popular Synthesizers | MACHINE | So much gear, so little time! | 17 | 12th April 2006 09:31 PM |
| |