Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ampex 351 Load with Ribbons laoded So much gear, so little time! 0 24th February 2006 10:32 AM
Millennia HV3 and Gordon mic preamps massimo Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 97 19th February 2006 01:30 AM
Difference between Rated Impedance & Rated Load Impedance? pardahl So much gear, so little time! 1 25th June 2005 07:18 PM
Preamp Impedance Questions... vikingbath High end 5 22nd June 2005 04:24 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 26th December 2005, 05:04 AM   #1
laoded
Gear Head
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 63
Impedance/Load Questions - Ampex, Millennia preamps, etc.

hi everyone and happy holidays! first time poster here.

i've started working at a new studio, and have gotten some strange results with mics and preamps. wasn't sure with what was going on, so i did some research...i think what i've been experiencing are impedance mismatching.

the Ampex MX-10 and Millennia HV3 were used for some tracking. I ended up going with a couple Earthworks mics into the MX-10 for some Toy Piano stuff. got some interesting tones. then, using the same mics, i tried tracking some glockenspiel into the mx-10 in mono, and all i got were a-little-too-interesting, ring modulating-type sounds. so, we used the millennia pre and got more "standard" sounds (not that the ampex sounded bad).

just looking at the royer cheat sheet says that royers work best with a preamp that has at least a 1500 ohm impedance or else the signal will lose low end and body. and the earthworks are at 600 (meaning 3000 impedance is best?)

how can i change these loads so the ampex pre (200 ohm rating) can handle these mics better?

perhaps a -20 pad would have helped with the ring-modulating and distorting of the ampex pre, but would these impedance mismatchings also be a cause for harsh sounds?

thanks!
gene
laoded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th December 2005, 10:02 AM   #2
brianroth
Lives for gear
 
brianroth's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 1,022
It's possible that the Ampex was being overdriven. An input pad might be in order, and with a lossy pad, it's also possible to do better impedance matching.

Bri
__________________
Brian Roth Technical Services
Oklahoma City, OK
www.BrianRoth.com
brianroth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th December 2005, 04:08 PM   #3
laoded
Gear Head
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 63
thanks for the reply! what are some ways to adjust impedance mismatches (asides from trying a different mic or preamp)?
laoded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th December 2005, 09:26 AM   #4
brianroth
Lives for gear
 
brianroth's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 1,022
If you can accept the signal ooss, a pad can be designed to have differetn input and output impedances. Typically, you would use a pad with, say, 1500 Ohms input impedance to appear like a typical input stage, and a 200 Ohm output impedance so the transformer "thinks" it is seeing a mic's output. My friend Rick Chinn has written a general paper about pads:

http://www.uneeda-audio.com/pads/

Bri
__________________
Brian Roth Technical Services
Oklahoma City, OK
www.BrianRoth.com
brianroth is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0