![]() | All Advertisers |
| | #1 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 266
Thread Starter | MR816x MOD? Who of the BLA fans on here would like to see this? i've heard the 002's mod and its a great improvement, and the forum on here showing how close the MR8 is to the Orpheus makes me wonder what this mod would be able to accomplish. |
| | |
| | #2 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,747
| Quote:
No need to spend senseless money on a NOT NEEDED upgrade for a perfectly sound unit Mine sounds just fine
__________________ | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 266
Thread Starter | i think they're good too im just curious as to if it will sound better than an Orpheus after a mod considering its so close to it now. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: worldwide
Posts: 626
| Man I'm freaking loving my MR816 as is! But it is an interesting idea. ![]() |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: N.Y.C.
Posts: 2,597
| |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Canada
Posts: 412
| Double ditto. The only mod that would be useful is the ability to bypass all mic preamps. As far as conversion, try another clock for shits and giggles. It will be hard to improve on this sound.
__________________ Dove "master tweaker in the e-zoo band" |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 245
| Quote:
oh man, aint that the truth besides that...I love how clean and clear the yamaha pres are
__________________ -Jonathan ....Turn down the suck knob on that Crate! | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Canada
Posts: 412
| |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 266
Thread Starter | i agree with the pre-amp upgrade but i also think that since its so good now it would be of mastering quality and even surpass a ULN-8 actualy how many of you think the MR816 or BLA modded 002/3R is of mastering quality? |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 266
Thread Starter | i was hoping the MR8 was good enough for mastering however i guess no one does...lol What about the "Seventh Circle" pre's? could you (or i) replace the pre's in the MR816 so there is 2 inputs for outboard pre's then 4 high end pres and then the 2 regular MR8 pre's? |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 266
Thread Starter | ok now im throwing my own post off topic but oh well, is the metric halo 2882 or the MR8 better? im a little confused since the uln-8 is supposedly better than Orpheus but the mr8 is almost as good as the orpheus and the 2882 isnt as good as the uln-8 |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,747
| Metric Halo is MAC only BTW just in case your a PC guy |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 266
Thread Starter | |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,747
| I think YOU need to decide what DAW your using and the rest of the decision making will be simplified ![]() |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 266
Thread Starter | Quote:
thats why so many questions and why im confused as to which im going to be upgrading to. | |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,747
| Quote:
Like you, I like Protools as well. Hated the sound quality on my 002Rack and the lack of ADC and the nickel diming to get more features. It ticked me off that I would have to have another company re-do the whole guts of the 002R to make it sound good. So, I said bye bye to tools Hence, I SOLD the 002Rack and bought an MR816X to use with Cubase here. The unit sounds great to be honest. A marked improvement over the MOTU 828MKii I had as well. Thats why I say pick your DAW and then it gets easier my man. Im thinking of getting another MR816X here and taking my Ashley LM308 out of the loop since the MR is MUCH quieter. | |
| | |
| | #17 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 266
Thread Starter | Quote:
the only reason im considering the 003 with a mod is i can use cubase and pro tools and bla claims that the modded 003 at 48khz sounds twice as good as a mr816 or even the Orpheus at 96k i'd love that type quality however i dont know if i beleive that claim | |
| | |
| | #18 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,747
| Quote:
1. Your assuming the ASIO driver to run Cubase through Protools hardware is good. On the Mac side(Core Audio Driver) it WAS NOT at all. Crashed a lot, locked up etc You need to check the DUC and ask the PC guys 2. BLA would always claim their product sounds better, thats marketing 101 3. Drop the Orpheus off your list. Its WAY overpriced for what your getting. Many have SOLD theirs and bought an MR816 | |
| | |
| | #19 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 266
Thread Starter | Quote:
didnt know about the drivers so thank you, and i know its marketing i said i doubt it really is better than the orpheus. but thanks for all your awnsers | |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 266
Thread Starter | Ok, so im curious again. If the MR8 is so close to the Orpheus and the Orpheus is great for Recording, Mixing, Mastering, Summing, And the A/D/A is great for monitor's Would a D-Box really make any point in a MR8 set-up? or is the MR8 as good for monitoring? because im debating on 2 set-ups (Again) MR816, BLA Clock, D-Box, Alpha channel. or Use my Orpheus for everything, and use the on board Pre's A/D/A and Clock |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: San Francisco
Posts: 4,763
| Why don't you take advantage of some return policies and find out? |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 266
Thread Starter | |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Canada
Posts: 412
| The MR816 will not be a weak link. Alan parsons uses one. The areas to look into now are room treatment, monitors, mics and outboard gear. Also set up a nice comp for music apps only and you will be way ahead of most people. There are some great recordings being made in the box on systems not sounding as good as the MR816. I was protools for many years using both HD and and LE and the MR816 is way better. Considering how many great albums have been made on PTHD and considering the converters in the MR816 are an improvement on that, there is nothing holding you back in this regard. With that as a strong base you can place emphasis on engineering and production skills. That is where the biggest difference will be anyway. |
| | |
| | #24 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 266
Thread Starter | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #25 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: London
Posts: 2,030
| Quote:
The MR816 Drivers work flawlessly on the Mac now | |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Steinberg MR816x problems... | FrankH | Music computers | 9 | 2 Weeks Ago 03:20 PM |
| Steinberg MR816X Routing | nyne | Music computers | 5 | 17th November 2011 12:45 AM |
| ASP008 v. MR816X? | GorillaToast | So much gear, so little time! | 2 | 4th January 2010 09:44 PM |
| |