Login / Register
 
Lead Vocals: Is 2k the new 12k?
New Reply
Subscribe
chriscoleman
Thread Starter
#1
29th October 2005
Old 29th October 2005
  #1
Lives for gear
 
chriscoleman's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 549

Thread Starter
chriscoleman is offline
Lead Vocals: Is 2k the new 12k?

Over the past couple years, it seems to me that the preferred "crank-the-sh*t-out-of-it" vocal frequency range is migrating south from 12k toward the midrange, centered around 2k.

Every rock/pop vocal I hear on the radio has this big mid-push.


Could be my horrible horrible car stereo system.

Or should I say car mono system.


No big, just an observation.

Oh, and to make this a GS post: Red-lining a Distressor in opto mode going into an API 560 is good at aping the above sound.
#2
29th October 2005
Old 29th October 2005
  #2
Lives for gear
 
RKrizman's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 7,776

RKrizman is offline
The biggest secret of all is that 1 k is the next 2k.

-R
chriscoleman
Thread Starter
#3
29th October 2005
Old 29th October 2005
  #3
Lives for gear
 
chriscoleman's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 549

Thread Starter
chriscoleman is offline
That is one octave better.
#4
29th October 2005
Old 29th October 2005
  #4
Gear addict
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 376

borau is offline
wasn't 1K hip in '97? I tought we where going towards a real nice High Q 3,5kHz, soon?
#5
29th October 2005
Old 29th October 2005
  #5
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Franklin, TN
Posts: 497

MichaelT is offline
I just think it's funny that frequencies can be fads!
chriscoleman
Thread Starter
#6
29th October 2005
Old 29th October 2005
  #6
Lives for gear
 
chriscoleman's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 549

Thread Starter
chriscoleman is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by borau
I tought we where going towards a real nice High Q 3,5kHz, soon?
Nah, that swept through Europe circa late 2002 (you should know, given your use of a comma in "3,5kHz").

The next big thing is a simultaneous boost AND cut at 685...with a little love at 18.2k.





But honestly, we all know that the real professionals always run lead vox through four different EQ's all set flat.

And an expander.
#7
29th October 2005
Old 29th October 2005
  #7
Gear nut
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: London UK
Posts: 120

lubaloo is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by chriscoleman
(you should know, given your use of a comma in "3,5kHz").
lol
#8
29th October 2005
Old 29th October 2005
  #8
Lives for gear
 
David Herbert's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 556

David Herbert is offline
What's the frequency, Kenneth?
#9
30th October 2005
Old 30th October 2005
  #9
Lives for gear
 
Berolzheimer's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: El Lay
Posts: 2,205

Berolzheimer is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by chriscoleman
Oh, and to make this a GS post: Red-lining a Distressor in opto mode going into an API 560 is good at aping the above sound.


I suspect that is what you're hearing. It's not aping the thing, it is the thing.
__________________
Purveyor of fine sounds since 1961.
My very incomplete IMDB list:

My very incomplete IMDB list

I'm all ears.
#10
30th October 2005
Old 30th October 2005
  #10
Jai guru deva om
 
warhead's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 13,982

warhead is offline
Why 2K?

War
#11
30th October 2005
Old 30th October 2005
  #11
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: MO USA
Posts: 2,158

squeegybug is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by warhead
Why 2K?
Why not?



Of all the frequencies I hate the worst... no, 1.6K is the worst. But 2K is almost as worse.

Steve
#12
30th October 2005
Old 30th October 2005
  #12
Gear Head
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 33

Happy Bird is offline
My personal 2k is 5k-7k. The pain zone.
#13
30th October 2005
Old 30th October 2005
  #13
Jai guru deva om
 
warhead's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 13,982

warhead is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by squeegybug
Why not?



Of all the frequencies I hate the worst... no, 1.6K is the worst. But 2K is almost as worse.

Steve
Sorry, I should have put one of these up:

it was a silly play on words...Y2k...

War
__________________
Warren Dent, Owner - ZenPro Audio: Gear Now & Zen

#14
31st October 2005
Old 31st October 2005
  #14
Gear maniac
 
papawhitehead's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Location: Austin
Posts: 245

papawhitehead is offline
2k or not 2k, THAT is the question!
Can't believe I actually typed that!
__________________
I've told you a million times, don't exaggerate!
------------------------------------------------------
Rob Whitehead
TweaK FreQ StudioS
http://www.tweakfreqstudios.com
Austin, TX
#15
31st October 2005
Old 31st October 2005
  #15
Lives for gear
 
2leod's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Location: A big Canadian island in the Pacific, but my citizenship is otherworldly...
Posts: 937

2leod is offline
The day that Mary Kay becomes the next 12k is the day I hang up the cables...

GAAK!! Flicking thru MTV I see that boat's already sailed.



Sinks into depression....
__________________
Doug

#16
31st October 2005
Old 31st October 2005
  #16
Gear maniac
 
sinsay's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Location: Space City
Posts: 195

sinsay is offline
O. K. Already!
#17
31st October 2005
Old 31st October 2005
  #17
Gear addict
 
tonymite's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 459

tonymite is offline
i thought that " it " was the new " that"
#18
31st October 2005
Old 31st October 2005
  #18
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: East Coast, USA
Posts: 656

bloodstone is offline
Midrange

Some famous pro audio icon once said that it's all about the midrange. I now believe that's true. I used to think everything from 1-3.5k was an evil region only meant for subtractive eq. Now I'm realizing that at times a little boost in that area can be a good thing. Also, definitely it's become very trendy to boost around 2k.

Due to headphone abuse and master blaster car stereos set to 11, most people probably can't hear much above 2k anyway LOL
#19
31st October 2005
Old 31st October 2005
  #19
Lives for gear
 
severe's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 1,176

severe is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by warhead
Why 2K?

War

'cause 12k is so last year.
#20
31st October 2005
Old 31st October 2005
  #20
Gear maniac
 
Joined: May 2003
Location: garden city, mi
Posts: 282

snedley is offline
Don't make me quote from South Park mmmmmmmm-k
#21
1st November 2005
Old 1st November 2005
  #21
Lives for gear
 
PaRaNoId's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 576

PaRaNoId is offline
my silliness online

Its interesting u mentioned that u could get the new sound by running a distressor, basically in overdriven optical mode, into an API. I think now that recording mediums have become so "prsitine" and regulated, people like to hear the sound of older gear (more mids, more tubes, more T.H.D., esp. at 1-4 khz). It gives that "ripping through the surface of your consiousness" sound. Or maybe I'm just another zombie......
__________________
It's not the tools, it's the talent...

Clients include- GIN BLOSSOMS, SOCIAL DISTORTION, FOSTER THE PEOPLE, HOT HOT HEAT, CAGE THE ELEPHANT, SILVER SUN PICKUPS, PHOENIX, DIRTY HEADS, FLY LEAF, ROGER CLYNE AND THE PACEMAKERS, BUSTICLES, ANDY GRAMMER and tons more....
New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn  Submit Thread to Google+ Google+ 
 
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter / Forum
Replies
jazztone / So much gear, so little time!
5
BackHand / Geekslutz forum
5
Matt Hepworth / So much gear, so little time!
6
ernie5 / High end
23

Forum Jump

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.