ITB,OTB, OTB to tape, examples enclosed - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!

ITB,OTB, OTB to tape, examples enclosed
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th October 2005   #1
Lives for gear
 
everybody's x's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: kansas city
Posts: 1,642

Thread Starter
ITB,OTB, OTB to tape, examples enclosed

Note; I have edited the original message because I screwed it up, here are the new files

some of you may find this interesting, then again it may start more arguments
here are 2 tracks Identical in every way except

1.one version is completely ITB

2. one version is mixed out of the box through my yamaha board (rm800) then to 1/4" 456 on my studer A807


The version that hit tape is WILDLY better in my room coming off the tape, but once converted back to digital the benefits seem to diminish considerably.

Anyway I thought it might be fun to try them out and see what the opinions are.


http://www.everybodysx.com/shock5.MP3
http://www.everybodysx.com/shock6.MP3
__________________
Dave
everybody's x is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2005   #2
Lives for gear
 
RKrizman's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 7,441

Well, for what it's worth I like #3 the best. Is that through the board to tape?

Also, it seems louder.

-R
RKrizman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2005   #3
Lives for gear
 
everybody's x's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: kansas city
Posts: 1,642

Thread Starter
I wont spill it yet, but NOPE

BTW, I didnt do any kind of mastering to it, no compression or eq or anything,maybe I should have normalized them all to the same volume.


and I obviously didnt take the time to edit the tempo issues , and my bass playing sucks
everybody's x is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2005   #4
Gear maniac
 
tubesandteles's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 268

My gosh

#3's snare is less irritating.... It hits my ears better. Is that really to tape?
tubesandteles is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2005   #5
Lives for gear
 
everybody's x's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: kansas city
Posts: 1,642

Thread Starter
I thought so too. number #3 is NOT to tape. oh and an edit, I did use the boards EQ on each channel,
everybody's x is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2005   #6
Lives for gear
 
sleepwalker's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,270

I track drums to my Otari 1/2 8 track. On playback it sounds great. Once I digitize it(RME ADI 8pro), it loses most of what I liked on playback in the room. Kind of a bummer. I've got access to a Rosetta 800, but I doubt it would be worth the time and effort.

Quote:
Originally Posted by everybody's x
some of you may find this interesting, then again it may start more arguments
here are 3 tracks Identical in every way except

1.one version is completely ITB

2. one version is mixed out of the box through the board and back into my motu 1224

3. one version is mixed out of the box through my yamaha board (rm800) then to 1/4" 456 on my studer A807


The version that hit tape is WILDLY better in my room coming off the tape, but once converted back to digital the benefits seem to diminish considerably.

Anyway I thought it might be fun to try them out and see what the opinions are.
sleepwalker is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2005   #7
Lives for gear
 
everybody's x's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: kansas city
Posts: 1,642

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by sleepwalker
I track drums to my Otari 1/2 8 track. On playback it sounds great. Once I digitize it(RME ADI 8pro), it loses most of what I liked on playback in the room. Kind of a bummer. I've got access to a Rosetta 800, but I doubt it would be worth the time and effort.
thats exactly what Im hearing here.
everybody's x is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2005   #8
Lives for gear
 
everybody's x's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: kansas city
Posts: 1,642

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by tubesandteles
#3's snare is less irritating.... It hits my ears better. Is that really to tape?
OK, does that mean ALL the snares are irritating, just #3 is less so?
bummer
everybody's x is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2005   #9
Gear Head
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 35

I reckon:

shock) board mix
shock2) board to tape
shock3) ITB

shock3 sounds way more open and yeah snare actually sound so different like there's some treatment on it or something that isn't on the other two tracks
Marcus B is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2005   #10
Lives for gear
 
everybody's x's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: kansas city
Posts: 1,642

Thread Starter
you are hella-close
the "treatment" is the board EQ


shock=tape
shock2=otb
shock3=itb
everybody's x is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2005   #11
Gear maniac
 
tubesandteles's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 268

LOL

I have overly sensitive ears to certain frequencies. For example, a really essy sounding vocal coming through my cd player when I'm driving down the road might cause me to crash. Hey...I can't do better, I've already had my mix completely stripped in the MP3 section. I don't like the way the snare sounds in any of the mixes but #3. I can't tell you exactly why. I wish I could. But, I am curious, what were you using for guitar amps...and what mics were used on the drums.
tubesandteles is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2005   #12
Gear maniac
 
tubesandteles's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 268

**** YEAH!

Victory for ITB! Seriously, I was fearful that #3 was the tape. The tape I will never have. For god's sake, I have never even felt tape in person...LOL Well..cassette tape. But WOW... I honestly prefer #3. Tell about the setup. Cause it must have been good on the inside before you messed it up with that mean old board and tape!
tubesandteles is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2005   #13
Lives for gear
 
everybody's x's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: kansas city
Posts: 1,642

Thread Starter
GTRs= Les Paul>Mesa Boogie 50 caliber>Celestion Vintage 30's>57>Yamaha RM800 pre


Drums=
Kick Audix D6
Snare 57
Toms 421's
OH=mc012's
everybody's x is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2005   #14
Lives for gear
 
everybody's x's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: kansas city
Posts: 1,642

Thread Starter
of these 3 I too prefer it ITB, BUT I WISH you could hear the tape in the room, SO much better
everybody's x is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2005   #15
Gear maniac
 
tubesandteles's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 268

You aren't getting away that easily

How did you do the snare? Compressors and all. Any eq? What kind of snare is it? Dead ringers on it?
tubesandteles is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2005   #16
Lives for gear
 
everybody's x's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: kansas city
Posts: 1,642

Thread Starter
snare is a '68 acrolite. remo ambassador head, mic'd one inch from the rim or so. I track with Nuendo. I am using digital fishphones Blockfish for compression and Dominion for flavor, the verb is the stock Nuendo verb

it did have a dead ring on it (NO SAINT ANGER SNARES!)

eq is
boosted @ 143 5db's low shelf

notched at 380 -2 Q is 2.0

boosted @ 8900 4 db's hi shelf
everybody's x is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2005   #17
84K
Lives for gear
 
84K's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: right coast
Posts: 3,857

I like them in order. #1,#2, then #3.

#1 is definitely my favorite.


*EDIT* I wrote my response before I read the answer.... that being said, I did not know which was which. I just knew which I liked and in what order.
84K is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2005   #18
Lives for gear
 
everybody's x's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: kansas city
Posts: 1,642

Thread Starter
thumbsup the tape just sounds kick ass here. I will try dumping it back to digital at 96K and see if it maintains it's "tapeyness"
everybody's x is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2005   #19
Lives for gear
 
RKrizman's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 7,441

I'd say stop messing around with the Studer and mixer--you're just getting yourself into trouble.

-R
RKrizman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2005   #20
Lives for gear
 
everybody's x's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: kansas city
Posts: 1,642

Thread Starter
OUCH!
everybody's x is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2005   #21
Pragmatic Snob
 
u b k's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: The Land of Sunshine
Posts: 12,005

1224's

the tape never stood a chance... two passes thru the motu will kill anything! and if i'm reading things right, the board mix uses the yamaha eq's and itb doesn't?

with your setup, clearly, itb is the way to go.


gregoire
del ubik
u b k is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2005   #22
Lives for gear
 
everybody's x's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: kansas city
Posts: 1,642

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by u b i k
and if i'm reading things right, the board mix uses the yamaha eq's and itb doesn't?

gregoire
del ubik
that is correct, I will redo it with the eq's out to see how much different it is,

as far as the motus, well , Im stuck with them for a long time I suspect
everybody's x is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2005   #23
Lives for gear
 
everybody's x's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: kansas city
Posts: 1,642

Thread Starter
ok heres OTb to tape with all eq's on the board out

still think its better ITB
Attached Files
File Type: mp3 shock4.MP3 (4.40 MB, 1139 views)
everybody's x is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2005   #24
Lives for gear
 
lawrence_o's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: Belgium
Posts: 683

Hey guys,

The only conclusion I can make is that the converters aren't too good... I had the exact same problem until I switched my digi 1622 and 882 / 20 boxes to prism ADA-8 boxes. Now, when I go from the console to ITB, and back to the console, you don't lose all these details so ITB might be better here because the actual ADDA sucks... And believe me, it IS very important. I remember having sampled a kick from scooter through my AKAI S6000, which then went optically into an ADAT bridge. You should think that you don't lose anything once sampled because after all you stay digital. Well, that same kick into my pro tools sounded like shit. THe punch was missing and so I started hating the S6k. However, one day I used its analogue outs into a small mackie console and found that now, the kick had all the punch from the CD I sampled it from!!! Than I started realising how much crap digidesign sold me, okay, it's not an 888 nor HD but I also tested those against an ADA and the difference is still remarkable.

You guys who doubt should call Prismsound once and ask them for a demo ADA and try, I'm sure you're gonna start saving money to be able to buy that expensive box.


Kind regards
__________________
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grooveyard Productions:

http://top-producers.blogspot.com/

SSL6048E/G
32Ch Prismsound ADA-8 out
G5 Quad, PTHD3 Acell, Waves Platinum, SoundToys,
DUY and then some...
Some outboard: AMS-NEVE, Eve H8000FW,
Lexicon300L etc.

WANTED, Neve1073, 1083,1084!
lawrence_o is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2005   #25
Lives for gear
 
djui5's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 6,661

Send a message via Yahoo to djui5
djui5 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2005   #26
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 22

I guessed #1 was ITB and #3 was tape, kinda surprised it was opposite. #1 seems a little more clear and spacious, #3 seems stronger in the low-mids and less detailed, though a bit louder...(tapey-er?)
Have you tried mixing ITB then recording to tape?
Sounding good in any case.

Jed
silent E is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2005   #27
Lives for gear
 
not_so_new's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,699

Not bad but the vox are kind of buried huh?



Sorry just wanted to be a smart ass.

I will say that cheap converters are not helping the cause any. No offence but the Motu converters are not top of the line (sorry if this was covered already, I am not reading any more of the thread so I don't learn which mix is which). You said it yourself once converted back to digital the differences are much less. To me this means the converters are the weak link in the whole deal but it should get the digital hates out in full force....

__________________
Michael
not_so_new is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2005   #28
Lives for gear
 
everybody's x's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: kansas city
Posts: 1,642

Thread Starter
I think I need a good 2 channel AD to get it back from the tape.

the singer sucks, soo I buried him!
everybody's x is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29th October 2005   #29
Lives for gear
 
lawrence_o's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: Belgium
Posts: 683

Indeed, you need good ADDA, 2 channels or more. I've said it a few times and will say again: the best are by far prismsound! They are completely transparant and do not color in any way. Check out their web site: www.prismsound.com. I've been in your place too and tried a few converters amongst HD192 but did not like them all that much.

Ask prism for info on used ADA-8 96kHz models or check out funky junk.

You will be very very happy afterwards.

Kind regards.
Lawrence
lawrence_o is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29th October 2005   #30
Lives for gear
 
Sui_City's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: South of South
Posts: 820

Quote:
Originally Posted by sleepwalker
I track drums to my Otari 1/2 8 track. On playback it sounds great. Once I digitize it(RME ADI 8pro), it loses most of what I liked on playback in the room. Kind of a bummer. I've got access to a Rosetta 800, but I doubt it would be worth the time and effort.
Guys,

Put your RME's and MOTU's up against a good converter.

You'll shit your pants.
Sui_City is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Listen the sample of OTB vs ITB! Vertigo2006 High end 0 4th August 2006 11:07 PM
ITB Levels if mixing OTB jayjay High end 25 21st June 2006 04:58 PM
ITB OTB Jay Lee Low End Theory 2 12th June 2006 01:26 PM
ITB vs. OTB tvanveen So much gear, so little time! 88 4th June 2006 07:04 AM
ITB or OTB C.Lambrechts High end 87 3rd July 2005 06:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:33 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.