![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear interested | Learn me some mics!!
Moved to a separate thread after Jay's suggestion. I am putting together a studio, but am currently on a tight budget as far as the "big" gear goes (desk, DAW, recorder, etc) So I am going to go ahead and start buying mics, but I need some suggestions. I have: 3 SM 57s and 2 SM 58s, plus some other ubercheap odds and ends I bought before I knew what I was doing. So here's the question at hand: Tracking a full rock band: drums, bass, two guitars, keys, vox. Studio, not live. (Portability is a plus, but not neccessary) Let's put responses into 3 categories: 1 - The bare minimum. Assuming you are a God at placing mics, and getting a good sound with mediocre equipment, this is what you would HAVE to have to do it. 2 - It'd be nice if I had this, but since I'm on a medium budget... The mid range. Not the top top top of the line, but decent stuff, with perhaps a rare gem or two tossed in for good measure. 3 - Hi, my name is Donald, this is my girlfriend Marla. You can cal me Mr. Trump, if you'd like. Money is NO object. The band wishes to be able to hear the sound of a fly landing on rice paper from 20 yards away, and I'm just the guy to do it, here's my mic collection: Thanks!
__________________ "Whose hand is that?" - myself, in the dark once. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2002 Location: Boston area
Posts: 874
|
Forgive me if I don't try to take on the whole question, but let me just make a few general responses. Assuming that you are aiming at eventually being a "pro" studio on at least some level, you will need enough mics and enough variety of mics to cover the usual bases, or else no one will want to use yuor facilities. So, assuming we are starting from your existing 57's and 58's and nothing else, I would say the bare minimum additions would be: •A decent sounding large diaphragm condenser mic for vocals (as well as many instruments like saxes). If you are broke maybe look at something from Studio Projects or Marshall. If you have a little more money look at the Audio Technica 4050 or 4060, the Shure KSM 44, or a Neuman TLM 103. If you've got some serious bucks look at something from Lawson, Soundelux, Brauner, or maybe a Neumann M149. •A pair of small diaphragm condensers for stereo mic'ing (acoustic guitar, piano, etc.) and/or drum overheads. Cheap would be the Oktava MC012 (sometimes called MK012). Make sure you try them out if you get them from Guitar Centerl, as there are a lot of bad ones. If you have more money, look at the Josephson C42's. •A large diaphragm dynamic mic for kick drum. There's not a big difference in prices here between the usual suspects: AKGD112, ATM25, etc... almost every mic company has at least one "kick" mic in their catalogue (Audix, Sennheiser, Beyer, Shure...) I would say covering the above three categories in some way shape or form is a minimum requirement for a recording studio. After that? The next step would be: •more of the above to provide enough mics to do larger ensembles and/or provide a variety of choices. •a pair of small diaphragm omnis (Cheap: Behringer. More expensive: Earthworks QTC) •ribbon mics (Cheaper: Beyer. More expensive: Royer or Coles) •PZM or Boundary mics (Crown makes some decent ones) •some higher quality DI's (Demeter, Avalon U5, Aguilar, etc.) •add some variety to your dynamic mics: Shure SM7, Sennheiser 421 or 441, EV RE20, etc. |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| One with big hooves |
So you want three different mic setups? If you hunt for used mics you can come up with great stuff for about $6 or $7K that will give you plenty of options. I don't think I've ever used the exact same setup on any two projects (in about 7 years of AE'ing) but I do have things that I start with. If things aren't sounding right I'll start swapping out mics. This is the one place you can't skimp. Use one set of monitors, eat mac & cheese for 6 months, don't buy new Playstation games (well, do get Vice City) whatever. The sound starts with the mics and the mics matter way more then whatever preamp they're connected to. I'm sure there's really no surprises here. It's the same stuff that everyone else uses. Also, anything in the higher priced rigs already includes the lower priced stuff. When you see multiples it's because I can interchange them or it's my backup if the first isn't working. It's really a case of whatevers working at that day, on that session with those players. Budget rig; Kick inside - 421, Beta 52 Kick outside - AT4047, 414B/ULS Snare - SM57, MD504, Oktava MC012 (cardiod) Toms - SM57, MD504 Floor tom - D112, 421 OH - Oktava MC012, AT4041 or similar like CM700, SM81 Room mic (mono) - anything that fits, SM57 to a U87 Bass DI - whatever Bass Amp - SM57, 421, D112 Gtrs - SM57, 421 Scratch vocal - SM58 Mid-price rig; Kick inside - 421, Beta 52 Kick outside - U195, U87, 414B/ULS Snare - SM57, M201, MD504, Toms - 421, E609 Floor tom - 421, TLM103 OH - 451 or 452, KM184, TLM103's, 414 TLII, Blue Dragonflys, Room mics - TLM103, AT4047, Blue Baby Bottle Bass DI - Countryman, BSS or similar Bass Amp - 421, TLM103, AT4047, Gtrs - Baby Bottles, E609 Scratch vocal - SM58 High end (includes all of the above but adds) Kick inside - same as above. Maybe a 47Fet or M147 Kick outside - U67, U99, M147, Snare - KM184, KM86, 414 Toms - KM184, 414's Floor tom - 414, U87 OH - C12 (original, not the crappy VR), U87, Royer SF12, 251's, Earthworks omni's Room mics - RCA 77, C24, U87, R-121, Nuemann Binaural Head, Earthworks omni's Bass DI - Avalon, Demeter, Auguliar or similar Bass Amp - U195, 47Fet, M147 Gtrs - 414, U87, 409, Scratch vocal - Still just an SM58. I'll use something cool if we can stick the singer into an iso booth. Never happens in my place because I don't have a booth big enough to stick a singer into. There's a bunch of stuff I'm leaving out that's cool because I've either never used it or rarely used it. Like the Wright omni mics, Lawson, M149's etc. Just remember, there's no such thing as a bad mic. There's just the wrong mic for the wrong application. Even a C1000 can hold a door open.
__________________ J. 'Moose' Kahrs producer|mixer|recordist MooseAudio.com mooseaudio.bandcamp.com Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2002 Location: capitol district NY
Posts: 522
|
I can't really say anything about the no limits rig, since I'm far from that. Here are some additional comments on Jay's list. Budget rig; Kick inside - 421, Beta 52 ATM 25 Kick outside - AT4047, 414B/ULS Not currently doing this. Snare - SM57, MD504, Oktava MC012 (cardiod) AKG D1000e Toms - SM57, MD504 The Rat Shack ones that look like Sennheisers, when on sale run about $30. Floor tom - D112, 421 AT kick/tom per Harvey Gerst's suggestion. OH - Oktava MC012, AT4041 or similar like CM700, SM81 MXL 603 Room mic (mono) - anything that fits, SM57 to a U87 Studio Projects B3 in fig 8. AKG "the tube." Bass DI - whatever Bass Amp - SM57, 421, D112 Gtrs - SM57, 421 Scratch vocal - SM58 I've been using a Beyer M500 for this lately. Chick singer, a bit on the screechy side. The M500 is a cool mic to have for trying almost anywhere except inside the kick. Sometimes works where nothing else does. I'm told the other Beyer ribbons are also useful in this fashion, but I haven't managed to afford any yet. Some of the 70's Sony electrets are also quite nice. They seem to work in all sorts of places. You have to watch out for the ones that have lost charge and died. The EV 1776 condensors are also pretty hip, and can be gotten quite cheap. There's info around on coverting them to phantom power, which is recommended as the batteries are really hard to get these days. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear nut Joined: Feb 2003 Location: Devon, England
Posts: 117
|
What do people think about the Beyer M201? I've found a cheap source & thinking about getting a pile for toms, amps etc. Any preference over the Beta57? I have a ATM25 & was thinking of a couple more of those too. P.S. I'm very wary of secondhand mics, dynamics lose their clarity over time (& are not worth repairing). I just had a D12E go down & I haven't had it long, I think it's a goner which is a PITA. |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Gear maniac Joined: Jul 2002 Location: Outside Washington DC
Posts: 155
| Quote:
and the usual collection of non-beta 57s. It depends on the day, drummer, etc. but I really like the M201s on toms and Marshall stacks. Snares are more of a toss up.
__________________ pat http://www.pfarrell.com/prc | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2002 Location: Boston area
Posts: 874
|
Jay's not the first to suggest the TLM103 for close mic'ing drums. But I'll be damned if i could figure out how to do it with mine - combine the lack of a built in pad with an output that is so hot that anything close to a drum would max out any of my preamps even with their pads engaged and the gain pot full counterclockwise. I guess I'd have to use inline pads PLUS the preamp pads. That's why I love 414's (b/uls or EB) for that: the built in -20dB pad makes them perfect for the job. TLM103 is probably the last mic I'd want on a high SPL source, but maybe that's why I'm only a peon... So, do I have an unusually potent 103, or is there some secret technique involved? |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2002 Location: washington dc
Posts: 2,022
|
What does the room you record in sound like? Does it sound good or is the ambience unpleasant? How do the drums sound when played in there? Personally, I don't like close mic'd drums very much. Kick generally needs to be close micd unless you're lucky, and occasionally toms depending on the tonal part you want them to have in the song. I prefer just kick, maybe snare, overheads, and a room mic. Fletcher wrote a mini opus on micing drums with 3 mics. If you haven't read it, I'll find a link for you. The reason I bring this up is that iIt can be very difficult to close mic drums and have them sound good because of leakage, phase, positioning etc. Usually I find that it's easier to get a better sound with room and overheads with compression. What is your actual budget? Oh and last thing. IMO, 57s can get you very far. They have a very flat tone and auto compress (to my ears), which works well on drums. |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| One with big hooves | Quote:
FWIW, the 3-mic drum thing is great when it works. I'm mixing a project right now that was cut that way with close kick & snare as a saftey. But, it doesn't work for "modern" rock. Roots rock and alt-country are totally different. | |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Gear interested | Quote:
I have read the mini-opus on micing drums with 3 mics. Some great info in there. I already have a drummer who wants to help me experiment with that. I am just looking for a set of "must have" mics, since everyone here seems to have their favorite pieces. I know 57s will get me far, since that's what I currently have, and have been using them for many years for damn near everything. Now I am to the point where I want to make the leap into some nicer equipment, so I'm just looking for suggestions. Thanks! | |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Gear nut Joined: Feb 2003 Location: VA
Posts: 79
|
Hey HaB, You may want to look into that mic we once discussed. Let me see, what was it called...ah yes, the "Horlandifica" model. Hope that helps, J |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2002 Location: washington dc
Posts: 2,022
|
Have you read about the Rad Shack PZM mod? I think people use those for room mics and it's cheap.
|
| | |
| | #13 | |
| One with big hooves | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Gear interested | Quote:
I seem to remember a session we did long ago, and that one guitar player - Jake. I remember as we were recording that record thinking "man...he's really going to make the DAKE on this one." | |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Gear nut Joined: Feb 2003 Location: VA
Posts: 79
|
ROTFL! That's awesome. I remember that comment inspiring some eye rollery from a gentleman named Curtis. Late J |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2002 Location: Gardena, California and Maui Hawaii
Posts: 1,034
|
There are a good deal of great suggestions on this thread, however one thing that should also not be overlooked is the monitors. Monitors can make great mics sound bad, and bad mics sound good. I think the monitors play a big part of the chain as does the mic, mic amp, and room conditions. I have heard some bad monitors that killed what I knew was a good mic, so keep doing your research and make sure the room where you place your monitors is not throwing you standing waves, bass traps, or other extremes that will mess with your sound. |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Gear Head Joined: Dec 2002 Location: nyc
Posts: 49
|
hey y'all... i'm kinda in the same situation. i'm seriously contemplating the studio projects B1 or C1. Any owners of these? what do y'all think of them?
|
| | |
| | #18 | |
| One with big hooves | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #19 | |
| Gear maniac Joined: Jul 2002 Location: Outside Washington DC
Posts: 155
| Quote:
in designing and importing them... The C1 has a well known reputation as being a great deal. Only $200 and sounds much better. Probably a good choice for a first LDC. And they seem to hold their value well, so you can use it, and resell it on eBay if it ends up not suiting your vocals (or vocalists). But do you really need an LDC first? Only you can answer that, but you should first get at least a couple of SM57s. And as the recent posts on this thread point out, you have to have at least decent monitors before you can hear any differences in what you are doing. | |
| | |
| | #20 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2002 Location: Gardena, California and Maui Hawaii
Posts: 1,034
| Quote:
Most beginners tend to have a need for vocals, and acoustic guitar, with some guitar amps and some drums. For those applications, I really believe an LD mic will not only sound better, but it will do as well or better than a 57 on these "type" of applications. The LD you choose must be a real LD mic and not an Electret hiding inside a fake LD capsule. If you get a real good LD mic that is not very colored, then it has always been my experience that using an LD will provide better results most of the time given certian parameters. In the end, you do need both SD and LD mics, but pricing has brought the market more flexibility now where several years ago, a decent LD mic was $1K. | |
| | |
| | #21 | |
| Gear maniac Joined: Jul 2002 Location: Outside Washington DC
Posts: 155
| Quote:
I see you as amazingly neutral, and you are even allowed to be a little bit biased (IMHO) since you do try to earn a living with these things. I agree that the $80 price point for starter LDCs has changed things. Even just a couple of years ago, the Shanghai mics were a lot more than that. Since $80 is the street price of a SM57, it is much more of a wash now. Before, I strongly believed you should get two SM57s before worrying about a Shanghai. And probably ten mics before worrying about a Neumann. I think that there is probably a non-trivial jump in quality between even a started LDC and something like Alan's SP C1 at $200. I still hold that every studio needs a handfull of SM57s, I'll let people argue about whether to buy them first or second. If for nothing else but to put on drums where the drummer is likely to whack them with a stick. Condensers don't like being whacked, and there is the long standing joke about using SM57s as hammers if your truck is too far away to walk to. | |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Gear Head Joined: Jun 2002 Location: western pa
Posts: 34
|
for grins I bought a Studio Projects B1 to find out what all the fuss was about...the fuss is correct...($79) I reach for that sucker a little more than my 57....i love both of em...
__________________ ddavid |
| | |
| | #23 |
| One with big hooves |
A few thoughts... I'd rather have small diapraghm condensors then large if I could only have one type. Small diapragms are more accurate with respect to off-axis sounds. They also have more low end then a large diaphragm IF you disregard the proximity effect. Alan, has there been any feedback yet on the new SDC with the swapable capsules? They look pretty sweet for the cash. The problem I've run into with most of the cheap-o LDC mics is that they can't take any kind of real level. I've shoved them in front of semi-loud guitar amps and the diaphragm or electronics are distorting way before they ever hit the preamp. If you have a really loud singer you'll hear the same kind of electronic fizz on peaks, but you'll never have a problem on acoustic guitar or as room mics on a drum kit. |
| | |
| | #24 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2002 Location: Gardena, California and Maui Hawaii
Posts: 1,034
| Quote:
We have had very good response. Here is one we just got! Here is his comments: I just put the C4s and the LSD2 through a major work out and I wanted to let you know how thoroughly impressed I am. These mics are incredible! I did a reasonably involved recording in a large church - Christmas music for Organ and Organ & Choir. I used C4s about 100' away as ambient mics and the LSD2 about 20' away in an M-S technique. Everything went straight in to my Pro Tools Digi 002 rig - no eq, no compression, no limiting at 24/96 - and that's the way it will come out. Absolutely no processing is required. The mics are accurate and true right across the spectrum. For spot mics I used a C-3 and a T-3 - so it was a Studio Projects session all around, however we probably won't need them as the C4 / LSD2 combination produced a wonderful image. The bottom end on the C4s is stunning (and neutral) and that large capsule has proved again what a rich sound and versatile performer it is. I have never been more satisfied (with respect to recording that is...) Adam Plante Power Group Ltd. Tel 905-405-1229 x 22 Fax 905-405-1885 | |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Jr. Gear Slut 2nd class Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,900
|
With the obligatory mesh pop screen, have tortured tested both the B1 and C1 for very LOUD vocals (in volume not tone!) which they both passed with flying colors. And if the C1 works well enough for Tina Turner :-)... I tested some other inexpensive microphones like the Oktava 219, and they didn't do near as well. You'd almost swear someone opened a can of soda pop in the background! Chris P.S. Jahooza, as the B1 and C1 sound so different, it's an excellent learning experience to get both IMHO. Each is a fine vocal microphone, though one can work "better" on a given singer/song than the other. |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Lives for gear |
i forgot if anyone had mentioned the shure sm81's yet with respect to small diapragm condensers. might be a good thing to consider. also, shure has a few new ones out worth looking in to, but i haven't used them yet. i know the cm700 was mentioned, but i never liked them as well. ps: using a pair of akg 451's in an xy config for a small chorus and it sounds great. i'm a happy camper with that, but it's a jump up in price. |
| | |
| | #27 |
| One with big hooves |
Alan, has anyone put them up against the standard stuff? SM81, 451/452, KM84 or 184 etc.
|
| | |
| | #28 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2002 Location: Gardena, California and Maui Hawaii
Posts: 1,034
| Quote:
More time will tell as more opinions come in, but so far, so good. | |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ok! Help me sort some mic pre selections as per your overall experience | fuzzface777 | So much gear, so little time! | 9 | 31st October 2010 12:30 PM |
| Gain and Trim knobs. Learn me. | hduncan | So much gear, so little time! | 12 | 4th June 2010 03:18 PM |
| throw me some mic ideas (~$800) | Disjointed | So much gear, so little time! | 33 | 19th February 2009 05:39 PM |
| recommend me some mics to buy! | AveyTare | So much gear, so little time! | 6 | 18th October 2008 01:19 PM |
| I'm Happy - Scored me some mic bargains!!! | Mr Funk | So much gear, so little time! | 2 | 11th September 2003 12:01 PM |
| |