Vocals in the "null"/control room - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!

Vocals in the "null"/control room
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 15th October 2005   #1
Lives for gear
 
AlexLakis's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD/Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,630

Thread Starter
Vocals in the "null"/control room

Hey all! A discussion started in the "work in progress" section, so I wanted to open it up. I found a few old threads on the subject from a few years ago, but I wanted to get some fresh opinions/experiences...

Every once in a while (or more often than not), we run into a vocalist that just doesn't take well to recording with headphones...so, recording in the control room (or in the live room) with monitors/PA blasting turns out to be the option. For me, this seems to be a more natural, comfortable way to record vocals in general, it tends to bring out more energy from many vocalists...So, how do you do it while minimizing bleed and phasing issues?

Some point the monitors/PA speakers towards each other and place the mic at the spot exactly in between them. This is usually done using a ribbon or other figure-8 patterned mic, as the null of the pickup pattern lies in the direction of the incoming sound waves. Some will sum the mix to mono, and even reverse the phase of one of the monitors to control bleed. Also, EQ can be applied, specifically in the lows and highs, to maximize phase coherence. Tracks that the singer deems "unnecessary" to sing along with may be muted to provide further aid with phasing issues and bleed (and in case they get taken out all together later!) Some engineers have had success using a "triangular"-type setup with cardoid microphones.

So, what are your experiences with recording vocals this way? Summing to mono is an option, but flipping the phase always seems a little drastic for me...I know I couldn't put up with it, but if the singer can, I suppose it might be worth it. It would be best for me, in terms of setup time and gear selection, if I could get the "triangular" method down, although I've only tried it once, and have had questionable results. This technique would expand the mic selection a bit. Also, I find that fitting a mic with the vocalist is especially crucial (as it always is) in this practice, because any drastic EQ you might need may accentuate bleed/phasing issues. Any thoughts?
AlexLakis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 15th October 2005   #2
Gear addict
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 376

Turn of every reverb and other fx. that will change from playback to playback.

Record your vocals.

Record the same part with the vocalist standing in the same spot, with the same mix and the same volume.

Flip the polarity of the second recording and mix as loud as the one with vocals.

The bleed is pretty much gone, do it all the time.
borau is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 16th October 2005   #3
Lives for gear
 
AlexLakis's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD/Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,630

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by borau
Turn of every reverb and other fx. that will change from playback to playback.

Record your vocals.

Record the same part with the vocalist standing in the same spot, with the same mix and the same volume.

Flip the polarity of the second recording and mix as loud as the one with vocals.

The bleed is pretty much gone, do it all the time.
I don't understand...you're doubletracking vocals then? Wouldn't turning of the effects be just as much of a change as changing the reverb?
AlexLakis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 16th October 2005   #4
Lives for gear
 
opentune's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: good ol´germany
Posts: 1,554

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexLakis
I don't understand...you're doubletracking vocals then?
No, i don´t think that borau is talking about doubletracking the vocals.
Like he says: Track the vocals, then track again with the singer standing...
NOT singing.

That would result in two tracks. One with vocal and one without. Flip the
phase on one of these tracks and there you go...

The singer has to stand in front of the mic because of his "damping" and/or
"reflection" factor.
opentune is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 16th October 2005   #5
Lives for gear
 
AlexLakis's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD/Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,630

Thread Starter
Ahhhh, it all makes sense now...I swear, this virus is eating away at my brain...Hope it isn't that bird-thingy.

Thank you for your replies.

I suppose you could theoretically do this at any position in the room, as long as that position was kept static between the two takes? No need to reposition your monitors, eh? Sounds like a good solution. Anyone else have feedback for this technique?
AlexLakis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 16th October 2005   #6
Lives for gear
 
opentune's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: good ol´germany
Posts: 1,554

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexLakis
I suppose you could theoretically do this at any position in the room, as long as that position was kept static between the two takes?
Yeah, i think so. If you would the monitors around between the two takes,
then no useful cancelation effect would be possible...

And hey: Wouldn´t this be another tough task for the LittleLabs IBP?
opentune is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
When do you go for a "plate" verb vs. a "hall" or "room" fuzzmike High end 37 10th February 2010 09:19 PM
PART 2:Must have "MICS"under 1k pr? Favorite "Sleeper" "ROOM" Mics? "Out of the Norm" betsy Low End Theory 41 6th July 2009 08:15 PM
How can I work in this "control room"? initialsBB Low End Theory 8 28th July 2006 06:32 PM
"Control Room" Advice HudHudson So much gear, so little time! 6 21st December 2004 04:38 PM
"Floating floors in the control room" Who's done it? cajonezzz So much gear, so little time! 9 31st December 2002 12:58 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:37 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.