![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2005 Location: Paris
Posts: 929
Thread Starter | My conclusion after testing 4 preamps I have four different preamps; -UA2108 -DAV BG1 -TAB V78M -A Design Pacifica Since I'm not too busy at the moment, I made some comparative recordings of finger picked ac. guitar and drums OH. I did that because I realised that I didn't really know how each preamp sounds. They all sound good, and I wanted to be able to qualify them to make more considered choices when choosing which one to use in sessions. My conclusion is that they all have different characters and colours, but not to a point where any of them would be unsuitable for a particular source. What I mean is I think any good preamp can do a great job at recording anything, and that it doesn't matter so much as long as it's a quality Pre. Now I'm wondering how much a difference I would hear with preamps costing twice as much, like high end Tube pres; D.W Fearn, Mercury, Pendulum etc.. Also could you explain what do people mean when qualifying a Preamp as fast or slow, does that refer to how sharp the transients are captured?
__________________ http://www.myspace.com/jeangillet |
| | |
| | #2 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,766
| |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear | As an answer to the question of fast and slow, I would say that it means how quickly the preamp can move current. If it's fast then it can capture transient detail well and things can sound dynamic and in your face, dare I say "punchy". |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2005 Location: Paris
Posts: 929
Thread Starter | Quote:
Still, it takes time to learn what to listen to when talking about subtle differences like these. | |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Gear addict Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Lynn, MA
Posts: 335
| Quote:
The difference between 2 microphones - say, a SM7 and a KM184 - not subtle The difference between a treated and untreated room - nowhere near subtle. The difference between a nice, well setup guitar and a sloppy cheap one - not subtle When you think about it like that - it's clear where your dough should go. Daniel Fox
__________________ "For the rest of my life I want to reflect on what light is." -Albert Einstein 1916 | |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Colombia / Montreal
Posts: 1,307
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,224
| Quote:
I would only start investing in different preamps if my microphone locker is full. Or maybe I'd fill another locker and THEN start investing in preamps with different "flavors". Point is, some decent preamps will get you there.
__________________ Best wishes, JPeters86 | |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Gear Guru Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 12,050
| Quote:
--Ethan
__________________ Ethan's audio book is coming! | |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear Guru Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 12,050
| LOL, we already went over this Mike. A few times! Slew rate has no affect unless the circuit is driven into distortion. So unless one makes a habit of over-driving their preamps, frequency response is the only spec needed to define "speed." Mike, I'm never rude to you. Why do you feel the need to be rude to me? ![]() --Ethan |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Gear Guru Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 12,050
| Yes, it's a specific spec. But it doesn't "kick in" unless you overdrive the circuit. Mike, please learn to have a discussion rather than just calling people wrong. If I say something wrong, then explain what's right and why. Just saying someone is wrong with no further explanation is silly and only weakens your comments. --Ethan |
| | |
| | #12 | ||
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,044
| WikiAudio says: Quote:
Quote:
| ||
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Ottawa
Posts: 826
| Quote:
Frequency response is a linear criteria, and doesn't account for level dependent effects like slew rate limiting (and other forms of distortion). For the most part it's distortion characteristics that determine the 'sound' of a preamp...frequency response by itself is pretty irrelevant (i.e. 20 Hz to 20 kHz +/- 1dB is pretty easy to get in a preamp circuit). A class A singe ended Neve driving a gapped output transformer will have different distortion characteristics than a dual supply powered API pushing a non-gapped steel core transformer...and both with be rather different than a Millenia HV-3 with no transformers. Cheers Kris | |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Gear Guru Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 12,050
| Quote:
--Ethan | |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Gear Guru Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 12,050
| Quote:
--Ethan | |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Lives for gear | If you ever want to sell the 2108, please let me know! ![]() |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 206
| Slew Rate Its amazing how many gearheads actually beleive that this is actually a measure of "how fast' a preamp is and how it responds to transients, as if transients were somehow a seperate thing to the rest of the audio. If a preamp has a frequency response of 20-20,000 then it captures your transients perfectly faithfully - transients are just short bursts of high frequency content no different to any other peice of audio. I presume this one was pushed out so that we could pretend there is some extra reason we would need to spend money on fancy preamps,. |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Lives for gear | The only reason i bought outboard pre's beyond my humble 1208b side-car was noise-floor, beyond obvious considerations. I needed pre amps that could let me use an R84 to mic an acoustic played softly from 3' away... or to distance mic strings etc. There is a tonal difference between my Aphex 1100 and my Great River MP4H... and they're both around $1000 per channel but it's microscopic comapred to the microphone's response and the stuff your sticking it in front. The limitation on both these units is the lack of output control, but you can always buy a passive output. Oh, and the 1280B is great for a little saturation/distortion when overdriven. So is the LA610. So if you have a few that can distort pretty and a few that can deliver lots of amplification cleanly you've covered your bases. Something like the NV series by great river can do both I'm sure. nosebleedaudio: It's fine if you disagree with someone, but being an ass about it doesn't exactly make you look like Einstien. A little unprofessional I think. |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Lives for gear | So, frequency response is the range of frequencies the preamp can pick up, 20Hz to 20kHz. This part I am sure of. The slew rate is how quickly the preamp will read a signal. So for instance, a snare drum through an API would not have any distortion (or very little) but say through an Avalon (a "slower" pre) there would be some sort of distortion due to a slower slew rate that cannot keep up with the sharp transient of a snare drum. This distortion is what defines the natural colors of the pre's on certain sources. I'm more asking than telling :x ![]() |
| | |
| | #20 | |
| Gear Guru Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 12,050
| Quote:
--Ethan | |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Ottawa
Posts: 826
| Here's a National Semiconductor app note that deals with slew rate limiting: http://www.national.com/ms/LB/LB-19.pdf and here's a nice quote from it "Equation 5 demonstrates that the borderline between small signal response and slew rate limited response is not just a function of the peak output signal but that by trading off either frequency or peak amplitude one can continue to have a distortion free output." In otherwords, there is a tradeoff to be had between peak output power, distortion, and frequency response that is imposed in part by slew rate limiting. Again, frequency response is limited to the small signal response of the circuit, where its behaviour is largely linear. It's not accurate to say that a preamp with 20 Hz- 20kHz will accurately capture ALL transients, unless that frequency response is applicable to the ALL output levels that we will encounter. Cheers Kris |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: USA
Posts: 893
| Aside from the inexplicable nastiness (which in one minute managed to put me off JMK products for life; congrats on that), this has been an extremely fun and informative thread. |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: USA
Posts: 893
| Lollygaggers on the unpredictability of that response. You go, girl. |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: USA
Posts: 893
| Please. Good luck with all your future endeavors. |
| | |
| | #25 | |
| Gear Guru Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 12,050
| Quote:
![]() --Ethan | |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Lives for gear | |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 37
| One of the things I like about this board is that I can figure out who I don't want to deal with. I started keeping a "don't buy" with my "buy" lists in case I forget. bb |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2005 Location: Paris
Posts: 929
Thread Starter | |
| | |
| | #29 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Seattle
Posts: 977
| Quote:
Gentlemen, when you appear here and elsewhere as 'the face of the company', what comes out of that face's piehole makes a lasting impression on potential customers. If you choose not to let your products "speak for themselves", every comment you make online is not only 'forever', it's taken as the voice of the company. And there are plenty of other $1000-and-up this-year's-best-two-channel-preamps-ever to choose from. | |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: internet
Posts: 1,485
| |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| since i've been reading posts here i've come to the conclusion | tonyscarbones | Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production | 14 | 6th September 2008 08:13 PM |
| I came to a conclusion | willerichey | So much gear, so little time! | 5 | 15th January 2008 04:43 PM |
| Recording the bealtes...my conclusion! | Mattsson | So much gear, so little time! | 246 | 8th January 2008 06:23 PM |
| NEVE PORTICO RANGE updated conclusion. | Bob Amirian | So much gear, so little time! | 20 | 6th September 2006 09:34 AM |
| Testing..testing....HD_process vs HD_accel vs Dual opteron | guerillamixer | Music computers | 1 | 25th February 2006 02:07 AM |
| |