![]() | All Advertisers |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2005 Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 548
Thread Starter | Sufan Stevens
Does anyone know anything about the recording and mixing process for Sufjan Stevens' album "Come On Feel The Illinoise"? I can't stop listening to it.... I've searched around a bit and I've found album credits - but other than mastering, Sufjan is the only engineer listed...but in an interview in The Onion, he talked about using a studio for this album. Any info anyone? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear maniac Joined: May 2003
Posts: 232
|
According to what he said to David Garland in 'Spinning on air', Illinoise was recorded on the same old portable digital 8 track he used for Michigan, hence a certain similarity in the sound. All recorded tracks were then transferred onto pro tools for later editing, EQing etc... But he used this cheap device in a studio that had better mics than the SM57 he recorded Michigan with, hence the slight improvement in sound. I've listened to Stevens so much lately that after a while all other records sound too warm and thick to my ears... |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear nut Joined: Aug 2005 Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 82
|
I know that Sufjan did some work on Illinoise at The Buddy Project in NYC. I'm not sure what parts were recorded or mixed there, but I emailed the engineer, Kieran, about Sufjan's vocals sounds and he said he mainly used a 4033 through an Altec 1592a pre, and also a MXL V69, SM57, and C1000 (!). I hope Kieran doesn't mind me sharing this info, but he didn't seem to mind sharing it with me. It mainly sounds so good because of Sufjan's talent, anyways. I agree with Khai--after listening to Illinoise some of my work sounds really muddy and thick. But, the thin, airy sound doesn't work for everything. I am considering getting a 4033 after hearing how good it sounds on Sufjan's voice through a warm tube pre, though. -Jim Bob |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear interested Joined: Nov 2004 Location: denver, colorado
Posts: 24
| hey
chris, did you see him @ the bluebird when he was here at the end of july? freaking best show of the summer. amazing. everyone should make the effort to see him. unbelieveably good show. great stuff. g-monkey (in downtown denver) |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2005 Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 548
Thread Starter | Quote:
So (other than Sufjan's natural voice), I'd bet that's where the mid-range push comes from. I'd be surprised if they EQ'd it much. To me, Illinoise is just an awesome sonic spectacle - great sense of space and outstanding depthof field - and that's without even mentioning the sheer musical talent Sufjan and co. possess. Another prime example of "it ain't the gear" | |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2005 Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 548
Thread Starter | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear interested Joined: Nov 2004 Location: denver, colorado
Posts: 24
| AND!!!
they pull that sonic landscape off live. gifted, gifted, gifted... g |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear maniac Joined: May 2003
Posts: 232
|
One question related to Illinoise: on many tracks like 'Chicago' for instance, there's a REALLY high number of instruments juxtaposed simultaneously (through re-recording, most of the time I think), and it's really stuffy sometimes, but still each of the instruments has enough space in the mix. Doesn't compression during tracking makes it more difficult to add a lot of instrument parts in a mix? Isn't it better to keep individual sounds thin from the start by avoiding compression or use it only for solving issues? |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jul 2003 Location: new york
Posts: 361
|
Hello All. Sufjan did record a great deal of " Illinoise" at my Studio The Buddy Project . I can't take any of the credit for the sound ( well other than I do believe my room sounds good ). I would be glad to answer any questions about the album that I might know. Sufjan engineered all of the record with help from James McAllister engineering the drums. ( Drummer / Ester Drang , Sufjan , ) |
| | |
| | #10 | ||
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2005 Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 548
Thread Starter | Quote:
Quote:
Kieran, couple quetsions on Sufjan's engineering: 1) What was the recording device? The 8-track Roland box that I've read he uses, Pro Tools, both? Any tape at any point? 2) Did SS mix the album as well? Where? Thanks for chiming in on this thread! -CC | ||
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Gear maniac Joined: May 2003
Posts: 232
| Quote:
Your tracking room sounds good. How big is it? In general what compression did you use on things while tracking? Was Sufjan coming with most of the arrangements ready to record, or did he experiment much in your studio? For the richest arrangements (like 'Come on feel the illinoise'), what instrument did he start with? Drums? Was he really recording into his cheap digital 8 track and then bounced things onto protools, or straight into protools? | |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Gear maniac Joined: May 2003
Posts: 232
|
My god, I didn't notice he engineered it himself!
|
| | |
| | #13 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jul 2003 Location: new york
Posts: 361
| Once again I just wanted to say I did NOT engineer any of the record. that credit belongs to Sufjan Your tracking room sounds good. How big is it? The Buddy Project live room is a modest size at 13.5 ft x 14 ft with the walls splayed 8in on each side the celing is 14ft on one side 12.5ft on the other side In general what compression did you use on things while tracking? I dont think Sufjan used any compression in tracking . Was Sufjan coming with most of the arrangements ready to record, or did he experiment much in your studio? For the richest arrangements (like 'Come on feel the illinoise'), what instrument did he start with? Drums? the arrangerments I am not so sure about. the Drums were cut along with Sufjan playing different instruments to my knowledge. Was he really recording into his cheap digital 8 track and then bounced things onto protools, or straight into protools? He recorded straight into the 8track and would bounce into Pro tools then bounce back to the 8 track for overdubs Sufjan mixed the album in pro tools using headphones . I do believe Allan Douches deserves a great deal of credit for mastering http://www.westwestsidemusic.com/ He is an amazingly helpful person at preparing your masters also |
| | |
| | #14 | |||
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2005 Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 548
Thread Starter | Quote:
![]() I'm selling off all of my gear and not posting here for a while. Um, well, maybe. ![]() But, it IS all about the music and this one quote above completely nullifies any "ITB vs. SSL vs. Neve vs. RADAR vs. your grandma" thread that's ever come across any audio forum on the net. ![]() It goes hand-in-hand with the MB thread "Gear vs. the engineer using the gear". Quote:
Quote:
-=cc=- | |||
| | |
| | #15 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jul 2003 Location: new york
Posts: 361
|
How so? Did Sufjan send Douches rough mixes to get his help/direction before sending off the final mixes? Allan and Sufjan compared mixes in 3 different formats. 1 ITB , 2. mixed real time digitally to 24bit dat. and tried different dithering options . This I do know . the ITB mixes were used on most if not all of the songs.. and this was off Sufjan's 001. |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Gear maniac Joined: May 2003
Posts: 232
|
Thanks Kieran for all this information.
|
| | |
| | #17 |
| Gear interested Joined: Oct 2005 Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2
|
Hi Kieran. How did Sufjan approach miking instruments? Was he miking certain instruments in stereo, mono? Thanks. Mike |
| | |
| | #18 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2005 Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 548
Thread Starter | Quote:
The kicker is that the banjo is a pretty vital part of the tune, not a throw-away add-on. Interesting mix decision, to have a critical component of the arrangment at risk of evaporating in mono. But, those are the kind of decisions that make this album stand out. -=cc=- | |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2003 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 722
|
What was the EXACT make and model of the little 8 track? I want to corner the market on them on eBay before the word gets out. ![]() Damien Rice 'O' was also mostly tracked by Damien himself to one of those Fostex/Tascam Foscam? boxes. Supposedly mediocre gear sure starts to sound good when there's a heartfelt performance of a great song in front of it. g |
| | |
| | #20 | ||
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2005 Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 548
Thread Starter | Quote:
Quote:
| ||
| | |
| | #21 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2003 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 722
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Gear interested Joined: Oct 2005 Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2
|
So, my question now is, what if Sufjan had recorded directly into Pro Tools? That was an option, as the Buddy Project has a Pro Tools system, so it sounds like he wasn't stuck with using the Roland. It must be that he prefers the tone he gets out the Roland...? How different would the record have sounded overall if he had simply recorded into Pro Tools? What advantages, tone wise, does a Roland 880 have over Pro Tools?
|
| | |
| | #23 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2003 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 722
|
I can see it now: Roland VS8XX as a front end to PT. Gives you the indie singer-songwriter thing. Poor man's version of the RADAR=>PT thing. |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jul 2003 Location: new york
Posts: 361
|
my guess on the banjo is that is is a out of phase delay that is hard panned . As far as mono vrs stereo recording . I think most things are mono. some have 2 different mics ... not Stereo per say.
|
| | |
| | #25 | |
| Gear addict Joined: Jul 2003 Location: new york
Posts: 361
| Quote:
The choice was probably more for work flow than tone...... Sufjan knows his "tool" well. I dont think he wanted to be troubled with the patchbay routing and using aditional equiptment that would get in the way of focusing on the arrangements. I think this is a lession all of us who record and write could learn from. | |
| | |
| | #26 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2003 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 722
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2002 Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 592
|
This thread has been a profound source of both pain and inspiration I really love this LP though and have really enjoyed hearing more about it. Once again, God sends me a small sign that I should get off the internet and pick up my guitar and write some songs.
|
| | |
| | #28 | |
| Gear addict Joined: Jul 2003 Location: new york
Posts: 361
| Quote:
ME TOO | |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2006 Location: US
Posts: 2,361
|
Sufjan is going on tour of the US and tickets are now on sale I think (as of today)... he mentioned in an interview that he would have a small string section touring with him..
__________________ Justin Justice |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 880
|
good questions :-)
|
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sufjan Stevens | darkwater | So much gear, so little time! | 2 | 17th April 2006 08:13 PM |
| New Recording: Cat Stevens Tune | Rick Shepherd | Work In Progress / Advice Requested / Show & Tell / Artist Showcase / Mix-Offs | 2 | 8th October 2005 01:55 PM |
| |