Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!


New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10th November 2009   #1
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Nashville
Posts: 3,408

Thread Starter
Would anyone be interested in a DBX 163X and SSL Buss Compressor comparison?

I've read on a couple threads that the dbx 163X is a "poor man's SSL"

So, I found a pair for sale and bought them, as well as all the components Jim Williams recommends for upgrading them (hopefully the caps I bought fit, I ordered Elna 1000uf aluminum electrolytic capacitors, which were almost $3 each (compared to 78 cents for others!) and was thinking about doing an A/B with a SSL G384.

Would anyone be interested in hearing this?
Sean Sullivan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th November 2009   #2
Gear nut
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 136

I would love to hear this comparison. I have a 166A dua;l compressor. I think it is the same as the 163 but with 2 compressors.
JSpark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th November 2009   #3
Lives for gear
 
shaneoconnor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NYC/ Boston
Posts: 799

Send a message via AIM to shaneoconnor
whoa, so far from each other it is scary.
shaneoconnor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th November 2009   #4
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Nashville
Posts: 3,408

Thread Starter
I'm just going by what others have said. I just think it might be fun to actual do a comparison others can hear.

If Jim has any other suggestions for improving the dbx 163X beyond what I've been able to find in other post, let me know
Sean Sullivan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th November 2009   #5
Lives for gear
 
Mertmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 942

I'd love to hear this comparison.

I'm a big fan of the 163x. Never heard an SSL bus compressor.
I wouldn't be surprised if A) they sounded very similar. B) they were totally different.

Either way, it would be an entertaining comparison. Bring it on!
Mertmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th November 2009   #6
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Nashville
Posts: 3,408

Thread Starter
Cool. I'm guessing the fairest comparison would be the SSL in "auto" mode?

What kind of material would you like to hear? Anything and everything?

I like SSL style compression on piano and drums, but I'm sure I can round up anything.
Sean Sullivan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th November 2009   #7
Gear addict
 
UPRYZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lynn, MA
Posts: 335

Just Do It.

I've got 2 163's - one I got for free, the other for $40. On a couple occasions I've had startlingly good results with the 163 as a bass di. When used after a preamp I have noticed some unpleasant high frquency wierdness they impart however.

But super low end boxes vs SSL - who wouldn't love that matchup? (right - people who paid big money for the SSL gear...)
__________________
"For the rest of my life I want to reflect on what light is."
-Albert Einstein 1916
UPRYZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th November 2009   #8
Lives for gear
 
drtechno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rapid City, SD
Posts: 596

it would nice to find out since the only real difference between the two circuits is the a/b push pull output line stage on the ssl in tansistors and the dbx op amp (pushpull internal) linestage.

I've done a comparison between a my g series SSL and a stereo linked DBX160A and they Identical, except I don't have the autofade funtion, but I do fade somewhere else anyways.
__________________
In live sound, we make the band one with the environment, In recording, we define the environment in which the vision of the song is recorded.
drtechno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2009   #9
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Nashville
Posts: 3,408

Thread Starter
Well, I got half the parts I ordered (I had to order from Digikey and Mouser) and the caps I bought are huge (same width as my thumb, about half as long) so I don't think those are going to fit
Sean Sullivan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2009   #10
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 10

Oh yeah, I would like to hear that but I think I already know what the results will be.
frankencat is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
ssl buss compressor which? spektor High end 1 14th September 2007 04:06 PM
BEST SETTINGS ON WAVES RENN COMPRESSOR - TO EMULATE SSL MIX BUSS COMPRESSOR? Rockman So much gear, so little time! 19 27th June 2007 10:16 PM
anyone use a DBX 163x compressor on Vocals? Ginazgifs Low End Theory 10 17th March 2007 05:07 PM
DBX compressor comparison... The Marrvel Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 0 3rd February 2006 04:06 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:40 AM.

 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com Limited - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office: 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.