![]() | All Advertisers |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,336
Thread Starter | Euphonix Mix+Transport vs. Control Euphonix Mix+Transport vs. Control So what is better in terms of real use? The MIX and Transport together OR just the Control - in real world use? There is a $100 difference between these two setups. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 150
| I would like to now the same thing ,from someone who has all of them maybe? I saw on AES(but really hard to decide unless you use them more) the transport and I really like it ,in pair with mix looks really powerful combo ,than just a "control" |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,336
Thread Starter | Bump ![]() |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,972
| Quote:
-- when you say 'real world', what is it that you mean specifically? All three units are different enough to justify the purchase of all them. The reason I went with the mix and the transport and not the control is because my needs were specifically to volume balance tracks during mastering, have access to plug-in editing parameters during processing, and a big ass jog wheel to scrub and move me through my project. However.. I'm finding that even though I can create macros with the MC transport via its soft keys -- I would love to purchase the MC control in the near future because of the touch screen that gives you a lot more access to macros and one-button commands. Since I am an RSI sufferer anything I can do to minimize keystrokes and mousing around justifies the price. Hope this helped, Michael | |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,336
Thread Starter | 'Real World" as in do people really end up using the touch pad of the the Control? Or is the Mix and Transports all you really would use? |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Reno Nevada
Posts: 385
| I use the Artist series with a Mac Pro running Logic 9 and the Apogee Symphony system with with 16x converters. I started off with a Control and a Mix. For me the fonts on the touch screen are very small and the screen is a little cumbersome, while the unit has great depth of control with the software I found myself missing the extra faders and the channel identifacation screens above them. also the jog wheel on the control is not very good. I traded in the Control, bought another Mix and a Transport and I'm very happy. The Transports superior jog wheel and programable buttons work well for me.
__________________ Jack P |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,336
Thread Starter | Interesting. The Control, looks very cool BUT how often do people use the DEEP features. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear | i ended up going with the mix...but my needs may be different from yours. i simply needed faders and pan pots. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,336
Thread Starter | Interesting. It sounds like most people do not use the DEEP features of the Control. |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
I know what I'm about to say is a sin, but Guitar Center normally has MC Controls and Mixes in stock to mess with if you have the time. Unfortunately, they normally have Cheeto crums and broken knobs from the idiots that walk around breaking gear and poking in tweeter domes. But it might be worth a peek if you live near one. | |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,336
Thread Starter | Hmmm...... I am getting a Transport and a Mix. Unless someone can convince me otherwise here. |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: France
Posts: 233
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear | |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,336
Thread Starter | One thing I did not realize was that the mix also has the ability to use the solo and mute buttons as transport buttons ---- after I ordered the transport. |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Sonoma, CA
Posts: 7
| I love the MC Mix/MC Transport combo - it's got everything. |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Gear nut | IMO: 2X Mix + 1 Transport. Control unit is cool and I still use it, but if I was stuck on an island... ![]() |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2007 Location: UK
Posts: 9,409
| i'd echo that. Tried 3 mixes and control here. The Control just seems to offer no advantage over a keyboard - I hate menus and multiple button presses. Liked the "Mix" enough to order a few for our edit rooms - but sticking with D-command in mine ... ![]() |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mackie Control or Euphonix MC Mix/Control? | NoiseLab56309 | Electronic Music Instruments & Electronic Music Production | 52 | 30th April 2010 02:28 PM |
| Euphonix MC Control/Mix | bexarametric | Music computers | 7 | 4th November 2009 02:51 PM |
| Euphonix MC Control or MC Transport? | piano | High end | 19 | 20th October 2009 05:55 AM |
| |