Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!


New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 15th September 2005   #1
Gear addict
 
rynugz007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: cincinnati, OH
Posts: 461

Thread Starter
which mic and pre for which drum

Im gonna be recording some rock drums here in the next couple weeks. The room is pretty big horizontally but the ceilings are not. Im going for a fat and intimate vibe. Kinda like pink floyd the wall drums or early 80's funk. But a couple songs should have a more roomy sound so i definately want a room mic.

Please dont suggest anthing thats not on my list. Im not looking for purchase recommendations. Im just trying to get someone elses opinion on which mic should go into which pre on which drum. I'll probably just record a bunch of different combinations and see what hapens. Obviously i only have 7 pres with good conversion so 2 items will have to be ran through my behringer ada8000. In your opinion which are the least 2 important instruments. This setup is my first instinct.

kick- re20 or d112? - Neve 1272 - rme a/d
FOK- AT4033 - neve 1272- rme a/d
snare - sm57 or audix i5- SCA A12 (api wannabee) - rme
hat - 57 or beyer m400 - behringer
tom - 421 - symetrix - rme
floor - 421 - symetrix - rme
OH's - AT4047's - rnp - rme
room - studio projects T3 (omni?cardioid?) - behringer

The 4047's are the only PAIR of condensers i own hence the obvious choice for OH's.
rynugz007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2005   #2
Lives for gear
 
RoundBadge's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Los Angeles ,Ca.
Posts: 8,754

If it were me,i'd probably go for the neve vibe on the snare ...switch W/ front of kick..
thats about it.
have fun.
RoundBadge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2005   #3
Gear addict
 
rynugz007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: cincinnati, OH
Posts: 461

Thread Starter
I thought about that too. I just hope i wouldnt sacrifice attack, seeing how the sca is most likely a bit faster than the neve. Like i said, i'll probably just record a few different passes to find the right combo.

thanks for the reply
rynugz007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2005   #4
Lives for gear
 
not_so_new's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,695

Quote:
Originally Posted by rynugz007
Im gonna be recording some rock drums here in the next couple weeks. The room is pretty big horizontally but the ceilings are not. Im going for a fat and intimate vibe. Kinda like pink floyd the wall drums or early 80's funk. But a couple songs should have a more roomy sound so i definately want a room mic.

Please dont suggest anthing thats not on my list. Im not looking for purchase recommendations. Im just trying to get someone elses opinion on which mic should go into which pre on which drum. I'll probably just record a bunch of different combinations and see what hapens. Obviously i only have 7 pres with good conversion so 2 items will have to be ran through my behringer ada8000. In your opinion which are the least 2 important instruments. This setup is my first instinct.

kick- re20 or d112? - Neve 1272 - rme a/d
FOK- AT4033 - neve 1272- rme a/d
snare - sm57 or audix i5- SCA A12 (api wannabee) - rme
hat - 57 or beyer m400 - behringer
tom - 421 - symetrix - rme
floor - 421 - symetrix - rme
OH's - AT4047's - rnp - rme
room - studio projects T3 (omni?cardioid?) - behringer

The 4047's are the only PAIR of condensers i own hence the obvious choice for OH's.

Some would say that the A12 is more than a wannabe......

not_so_new is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2005   #5
Gear addict
 
rynugz007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: cincinnati, OH
Posts: 461

Thread Starter
Didnt mean to disrespect the A12. I've never heard a real api anyway. I was just describing the vibe of the pre for anyone reading my post that wasnt familiar with sca.
rynugz007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2005   #6
Moderator
 
TonyBelmont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Boston,MA Providence,RI
Posts: 15,753

Looks like good choices for what you have... Now go make some records!
TonyBelmont is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2005   #7
One with big hooves
 
Jay Kahrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Earth, NYC metro
Posts: 5,898

Send a message via AIM to Jay Kahrs Send a message via Skype™ to Jay Kahrs
If I had that equipment for a basics session I'd go with something a little less standard...

Kick - RE-20 or 421 (try both)
FOK - AT4047
Snare - Audix
Hats - Notta. Maybe an SM57 if someone puts a gun to my head.
Rack - SM57 or 421 (try both)
Floor - 4047 or D112 (try both)
OH - 4033 in mono
Room - SM57, T3 (never used one, why not try it?) or even both.

Pick your pres and stick with 'em. Swapping mics will make a bigger difference, though if something really isn't sounding right swapping preamps around might help. I'd also stick the Behringer converters on the toms.

Part of that dry 70's funk drum sound comes from tracking in small, diffuse, really dry rooms. A larger part comes from tuning the kit so it makes that sound before you touch a microphone. Ask around about head & tuning choices and don't forget to put a wallet on the snare drum! Duct tape is evil stuff for damping tubs, use real gaffers tape or better yet, get some Moongels from a drum shop.
__________________
J. 'Moose' Kahrs
producer|mixer|recordist
MooseAudio.com
mooseaudio.bandcamp.com
Quote:
All you need to make a record is a mic, some tape and maybe some bad reverb...
Jay Kahrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2005   #8
Gear addict
 
rynugz007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: cincinnati, OH
Posts: 461

Thread Starter
now we're talkin'
rynugz007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2005   #9
Lives for gear
 
NathanEldred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: West Coast Central Florida
Posts: 7,130

Send a message via AIM to NathanEldred
Use your 4047's for overheads like you originally thought. I don't think the majority of people are into mono for overheads these days, and the 4047 is a much smoother microphone all around than the 4033. Overheads are extremely important, it's the worst place to skimp IMO. Good Luck.
__________________
Nathan Eldred
Visit Atlas Pro Audio
USA Distributor for Buzz Audio
Atlas Recording Studios, Inc.
NathanEldred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2005   #10
One with big hooves
 
Jay Kahrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Earth, NYC metro
Posts: 5,898

Send a message via AIM to Jay Kahrs Send a message via Skype™ to Jay Kahrs
Nathan, you know I love 'ya but I can't agree with you.

Yup, the overheads are one of the last places you want to skimp...that much is true. But the guy said he was looking for a 70's/80's funk vibe and most of that stuff has mono drums. Dig out your old Sly & Familys Stoned records, The Meters, Average White Band etc. and take a good listen. The drums are either mono, semi-stereo (10 & 2) or even panned all the way to one side.

That's why I suggested the mono overhead. If he wants the vibe of those records, then you gotta do the same kinds of things and stereo overheads isn't it. With a mono overhead in the right place you'll capture everything that needs to be there. Well, that's assuming the drum kit is a reasonable size, it wouldn't work for a Neil Pert or Bozzio size rig but for the average 4-5 piece kit it'll work fine. Yeah, the 4047 is a bit smoother but I'd rather have that out front to get the body of the toms and low end push & fullness from the kick. Plus, it wouldn't hurt to have a little extra top end sizzle since it is the overhead...that's why I'd start with the 4033 up top.

There is a bit of method to the madness.

Jay Kahrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2005   #11
Lives for gear
 
NathanEldred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: West Coast Central Florida
Posts: 7,130

Send a message via AIM to NathanEldred
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Kahrs
Nathan, you know I love 'ya but I can't agree with you.

Yup, the overheads are one of the last places you want to skimp...that much is true. But the guy said he was looking for a 70's/80's funk vibe and most of that stuff has mono drums. Dig out your old Sly & Familys Stoned records, The Meters, Average White Band etc. and take a good listen. The drums are either mono, semi-stereo (10 & 2) or even panned all the way to one side.


That's true, but he also mentioned Pink Floyd...which is a pretty big/wide sound with a blend of 'stereo' ambient and close micing. Either way though, as there are no rules. thumbsup
NathanEldred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2005   #12
Gear addict
 
rynugz007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: cincinnati, OH
Posts: 461

Thread Starter
i'm definately gonna go stereo OH's. I think im pretty set in stone on using 4047's for OH's. But i do see where jay is coming from. Maybe i should of said something like a modern more hi-fi take on the late 70's early 80's tubby drum sound.

becks "sea change" is a good example of the sound im going for except the tunes im recording are a bit more up tempo space rock/funk.
rynugz007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2005   #13
One with big hooves
 
Jay Kahrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Earth, NYC metro
Posts: 5,898

Send a message via AIM to Jay Kahrs Send a message via Skype™ to Jay Kahrs
Quote:
Originally Posted by NathanEldred
That's true, but he also mentioned Pink Floyd...which is a pretty big/wide sound with a blend of 'stereo' ambient and close micing. Either way though, as there are no rules. thumbsup
Uh huh...but if you watch the "Live at Pompei" DVD you'll see a single overhead! LOL

I dunno...I'd still put the 4047 out front...the 4033 won't get the beef of the kick. You could also try mis-matched overheads, use a 4033 on the ride side and the 4047 over the hat side.
Jay Kahrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2005   #14
Gear nut
 
Jamstudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Capelle aan den IJssel, Netherlands
Posts: 143

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Kahrs
Uh huh...but if you watch the "Live at Pompei" DVD you'll see a single overhead! LOL
"Live at Pompei" it the worst sounding pink floyd recording ever
And he was talking 80ties in stead of 70ties

the use damping rings (dunno ebglish word 4 that) on the snare and toms in 70...80 short and kind of dry

Remco
__________________
Remco van grevenbroek
www.jamstudio.nl

Yeah i got bad taste
Jamstudio is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2005   #15
member no 666
 
Fletcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 9,464

If it were me, I'd probably ditch the RME converters

I know you said you weren't looking for purchase recommendations [my apologies for subverting that request]... but of all the weak spots in the setup, that seems to be the weakest link... and something you might want to address [or not].

As for which mic on which drum... play around if you have time and find the right sound. I once tried a D-112 on a snare drum... didn't suck.

Best of luck with it all.
__________________

CN Fletcher

Professional Affiliations:

R/E/P Professional Recording Engineer and Producer forums - serious hobbyists welcome

TELEFUNKEN Elektroakustik

SoundPure.com


mwagener wrote on Sat, 11 September 2004 14:33
We are selling emotions, there are no emotions in a grid

Roscoe Ambel once said:
Pro-Tools is to audio what fluorescent is to light
Fletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd September 2005   #16
One with big hooves
 
Jay Kahrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Earth, NYC metro
Posts: 5,898

Send a message via AIM to Jay Kahrs Send a message via Skype™ to Jay Kahrs
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fletcher
As for which mic on which drum... play around if you have time and find the right sound. I once tried a D-112 on a snare drum... didn't suck.
What made you try that? The best use I've found for a D-112 is floor tom, second best was painted bright colors and stashed in the yard for the nephews to find on Easter morning.
Jay Kahrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd September 2005   #17
Gear addict
 
rynugz007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: cincinnati, OH
Posts: 461

Thread Starter
the d-112 was also used in the nine inch nails video closer. I think i recall trent licking it at one point.
rynugz007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd September 2005   #18
Moderator
 
TonyBelmont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Boston,MA Providence,RI
Posts: 15,753

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fletcher
If it were me, I'd probably ditch the RME converters

I know you said you weren't looking for purchase recommendations [my apologies for subverting that request]... but of all the weak spots in the setup, that seems to be the weakest link... and something you might want to address [or not].

Actually, I would say that the Behringer converters are the weakest link.... Also, we don't know which RME converters he has... but, generally speaking RME makes quite capable converters.
__________________
Tony Belmont

We Sell Gear!
High Profile Audio.....PluginDiscounts.com
TonyBelmont is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd September 2005   #19
Gear addict
 
rynugz007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: cincinnati, OH
Posts: 461

Thread Starter
I have the RME adi-8 pro 8 channel stand alone converters (hell, they have the word "pro" in the title. Doesnt that mean something?) which is going adat into an RME 9636. The behringer is clocked off of the adi-8.

Im sure there is ass loads of better stuff out there but i just don't have the cash for any gear upgrades right now. It costs $50 a day to put my kid in day care plus im still paying on hostpital bills from when i had my appendix taken out.

On the other hand. I have heard some great sounding records done with the same RME box that i have. I just finished a record myself with the RME's that im completely happy with for the most part. And any part that im not completely happy with is definately not the RME's fault.
rynugz007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th September 2005   #20
Moderator
 
TonyBelmont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Boston,MA Providence,RI
Posts: 15,753

Quote:
Originally Posted by rynugz007
I have the RME adi-8 pro 8 channel stand alone converters (hell, they have the word "pro" in the title. Doesnt that mean something?) which is going adat into an RME 9636. The behringer is clocked off of the adi-8.

Im sure there is ass loads of better stuff out there but i just don't have the cash for any gear upgrades right now. It costs $50 a day to put my kid in day care plus im still paying on hostpital bills from when i had my appendix taken out.

On the other hand. I have heard some great sounding records done with the same RME box that i have. I just finished a record myself with the RME's that im completely happy with for the most part. And any part that im not completely happy with is definately not the RME's fault.
Well, I have used the ADI-8 PRO at my friends studio many times, and it sounds great! You will be able to get a great recording with the RME...
TonyBelmont is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mic Pre for drum Overheads NL5 High end 26 23rd June 2005 06:16 AM
drum slut who's become a gear slut seeks mic pre ideas mejon Low End Theory 9 25th May 2005 07:30 AM
Drum kit and mic pre usage? KBOY So much gear, so little time! 5 20th March 2005 02:00 AM
Chandler LTD-1 or Daking 52270b Mic/Pre/Eq for Synth & Drum machine Tracking passionmax So much gear, so little time! 2 14th August 2003 05:31 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:07 PM.

 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com Limited - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office: 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.