Ssl alpha channel or waves ssl - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!


Ssl alpha channel or waves ssl

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 4th October 2009   #1
Gear Head
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 73

Thread Starter
Ssl alpha channel or waves ssl

Hi I'm currently using an mbox 2. What would be wiser to invest in and give me a better sound? An ssl alpha channel or waves ssl?
kevinn10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th October 2009   #2
Lives for gear
 
DivineMusic's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: Hotlanta
Posts: 2,120

Send a message via Yahoo to DivineMusic
the alpha channel
DivineMusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th October 2009   #3
Lives for gear
 
Slikjmuzik's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 2,699

Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinn10 View Post
Hi I'm currently using an mbox 2. What would be wiser to invest in and give me a better sound? An ssl alpha channel or waves ssl?
How much are you recording a mono source and how much are you having to affect tracks or midi information already inside the box. I'd say if you don't have plug-ins that are good, that's the way to go. If you're only recording a vocal to be added to midi tracks you are creating, you'll get more out of good plug-ins. I prefer the UAD stuff because it doesn't see the computer and their SSL stuff rocks.
__________________
Julian
Ear Candy Studios
www.earcandystudios.com

It's the indian, not the arrow...
Slikjmuzik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th October 2009   #4
Gear Head
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 73

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slikjmuzik View Post
How much are you recording a mono source and how much are you having to affect tracks or midi information already inside the box. I'd say if you don't have plug-ins that are good, that's the way to go. If you're only recording a vocal to be added to midi tracks you are creating, you'll get more out of good plug-ins. I prefer the UAD stuff because it doesn't see the computer and their SSL stuff rocks.
i record mostly pop rock stuff so im constantly recording mono sources( eg, bass, ac gtr,etc.). i have t-racks 3 already which i sorta like. i guess my question is: would i get a better sound using an alpha channel and bypassing the mbox pres and converters and then tweaking itb with the t-racks stuff and stock logic plugins or keep going in through the mbox and tweaking my tracks with something like the waves ssl?

p.s. i've heard that the uad waves is better than the waves stuff but i have an imac so theres no way of installing the uad, right?
thanks for your help.
kevinn10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th October 2009   #5
Lives for gear
 
Heartfelt's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,443

I am a person like you with multiple average channels of pres and conversion. I invested in a single high end channel to get the ball rolling. I suggest the single channel upgrade over plugs because:

All vox will go throu it.

All bass tracks can as well.

All electric guitar can, especially if you record direct and reamp.

All keys can go through it.

The end result is a lot of tracks with punch and clarity. I see more benefit there than with affecting lesser tracks with plugs.

MHO
Rob
__________________
Robert Smith
Houston, TX
www.RobertSmithMusic.com
Heartfelt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th October 2009   #6
Lives for gear
 
taturana's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Posts: 4,059

the alpha channel.... of course...
taturana is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 4th October 2009   #7
Lives for gear
 
Slikjmuzik's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 2,699

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heartfelt View Post
I am a person like you with multiple average channels of pres and conversion. I invested in a single high end channel to get the ball rolling. I suggest the single channel upgrade over plugs because:

All vox will go throu it.

All bass tracks can as well.

All electric guitar can, especially if you record direct and reamp.

All keys can go through it.

The end result is a lot of tracks with punch and clarity. I see more benefit there than with affecting lesser tracks with plugs.

MHO
Rob
Well, they're both the Waves and SSL are good. I hate comparisons cuz they only sound slightly different, but there should be no reason for someone not to get a good sound with either. With that said. The Pulteq and I believe the Fairchild as part of T-racks should make your vocals sound amazing. The Pulteq should sound awesome on guitars. For bass, I'd compress with something like an La3a or use a Neve type EQ if T-racks has a model out of either. For a first all-arounder channel strip, I feel the Alpha channel falls a bit short...if you're going to get one thing for front end for guitars, bas and vox, I'd lean you more towards the Vintech x73i since I'm positive it'll sound better for guitars, bass and vocals, even with inexpensive non-pro mics and even not having conversion built in and having to go line level into the Mbox. I def think that's the way to go. Eventually, get yourself a Rosetta200 and go in spidf into the Mbox. That way you have good conversion on the way in and you're monitoring with good D/A on the way out into your monitors. Nothing will help if your mixing environment isn't neutral though...nothing can compensate for a room that is busted acoustically. Just a bit of advice. Hope all that helps brother.
Slikjmuzik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th October 2009   #8
GS Community Manager
 
Whitecat's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: Surrey / London
Posts: 6,126

Alpha Channel. No contest.
Whitecat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th October 2009   #9
Gear addict
 
Leon EA's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: Gearmany
Posts: 370

Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinn10 View Post
i record mostly pop rock stuff so im constantly recording mono sources
That cries for good mics, a good pre, decent conversion. Waves plugs will not fix mediocre sounding recordings any better then stock Logic plugins do. The better your recording, the less you need to fix with plugins.

So, Alphalink would be the better investment at this point IMO. A good a pretty versatile preamp as well.
__________________
We do what we must because we can.
Leon EA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th October 2009   #10
Gear nut
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 103

If you're looking for a good pre, skip the Alpha Channel.
geektanic08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th October 2009   #11
Gear maniac
 
prologicmusic's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 254

Send a message via MSN to prologicmusic
the the alpha channel aint all that great. Id get the plugins and Maybe apogee mini-me, or some other good quality A2D. The UAD plugins are very good. And dont be affraid just because it is software vs hardware...lol
__________________
www.belviasound.com
www.twitter.com/prologic

Engineer/Production Credits: Royce da5'9, Raekwon, Wu-Tang, Llyod, Knaan, Joe Budden, Styles P, French Montana, Mario, Dead Prez, Saigon, Obie Trice, D12, Joell Ortiz, Gun Play, Sean Price, Zeds Dead, Slaughterhouse, Termanology, Kardinal Official + More.
prologicmusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th October 2009   #12
Gear nut
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 120

Get a Focusrite ISA-One with the digital out card. Run out of that via spdif into your mbox.

Waves SSL wont give you a "sound" it will give you the effect of using an SSL bus compressor, and the eq's are good too.

I use the Duende classic version, I love the eq on that, it has great high-end.

I had the Alpha channel a while back for a few sessions, it was OK in my opinion. You can pick up a Mynx for an extra grand of what you'd spend on the Alpha and you are getting the same technology from the actual SSL consoles.

If you are looking for decent plugin compressors without spending any or much $$, the Digi-eq that comes with PT isn't all that bad, and the BF-1176 is a decent plug compressor, if you use it right - it can give you the feel of an 1176.

Just my 2 cents.
Brody Murakami is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th October 2009   #13
Lives for gear
 
AMIEL's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: Miami, Fl
Posts: 3,615

Send a message via AIM to AMIEL Send a message via MSN to AMIEL Send a message via Yahoo to AMIEL
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinn10 View Post
i record mostly pop rock stuff so im constantly recording mono sources( eg, bass, ac gtr,etc.). i have t-racks 3 already which i sorta like. i guess my question is: would i get a better sound using an alpha channel and bypassing the mbox pres and converters and then tweaking itb with the t-racks stuff and stock logic plugins or keep going in through the mbox and tweaking my tracks with something like the waves ssl?

p.s. i've heard that the uad waves is better than the waves stuff but i have an imac so theres no way of installing the uad, right?
thanks for your help.
get a good mic pre!!! that will improve your sound !!
Get a Pacifica or Great River.
a combination or tracks recorded well with a good preamp plus cheap plug ins will take you further than bad recording tracks with "Better " plug ins!

GET A GOOD MIC PRE AND A DECENT MIC!! OR EVEN BETTER < A GREAT MIC AND A DECENT PRE!
__________________
------------------


Peace.

Reuven Amiel


"There are no rules, just knowledge, good taste and experimentation"

"Music was designed to escape from reality for a moment, not to magnify our fears and problems"
AMIEL is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
SSL Alpha Channel heisleyamor So much gear, so little time! 30 27th September 2010 09:43 PM
SSL Alpha Channel Glydez So much gear, so little time! 3 21st September 2009 04:12 PM
Avalon VT-737sp vs. API A2D vs. SSL Alpha Channel vs. SSL Alpha VHD Pre nafspark High end 5 18th May 2009 01:08 AM
SSL Alpha Channel or ? SparkyCanada So much gear, so little time! 0 15th April 2007 01:37 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:46 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.