![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear addict | Does clocking the RME Fireface 800 change it´s sound?
Hey! RME keeps stating that adding an outside clock will never improve the sound of the interface, as the Fireface re-clocks all incoming clocks. I had some time to kill and did a clock test with my FF 800 to see if it´d be improved or at least performing differently by adding another clock. The clock used was a Swissonic WD-8. At 96 KHz, I did two loopback recordings. One with and one without external sync. The test tones was a -3 dBFS 20 seconds long 10 KHz sine wave file through out 3-4 and input 3-4 on the FF800, at +4dBu input/output sensitivity, with balanced HOSA cables of 1 m length. I then analyzed the results using Rightmark Audio Analyzer (FFT 131072 samples, 75% FFT overlap, Kaiser window) to see if there was any difference in the frequency spectrum. Look at these files with microsoft´s image viewer or something similar that will show you the images in a sequence, or just overlay one over the other one with photoshop/paint shop pro, to see the differences. You be the judge. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 390
|
so... does it sound different?
|
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Gear addict | Quote:
I can´t hear the difference between externally and internally clocked audio on my FF800, switching between ext and int sync. When I used my old Wami Rack 24 the clock did a big difference, but only when I had recorded a bunch of tracks and mixed them. It sounded more defined, smoother, less harsh. Especially vocals sounded a whole lot better. Much less grain. It was easier to mix. I have a home studio and I haven´t really put a whole lot of money into acoustic treatment yet, so the monitoring kinda suffers from it. Now when I have the new sound card everything sounds a whole lot better and I have yet to notice a big difference between better and better, compared to how it used to sound. The test was more of a theoretical test, the spectrum analysis "looks" better when externally clocked, even though it "shouldn´t", according to RME... | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear |
Maybe you'll need a better external clock to hear a difference?
|
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Gear addict | Quote:
Yeah, maybe. Now this was just a clock test to see if RME was bullshitting us with the "the sound doesn´t change when externally synced". I got this Swissonic clock a year and a half ago for $200, to improve my old sound card. It did. I don´t feel the need to put $1400 into a Big ben to improve the clock of a $1400 sound card... and certainly not for proving a point. I´d rather just get an Aurora and be done with it. Now, if someone (Apogee) would help me prove my point by sending me a Big Ben for free... | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear | Lucid Clock
Although RME says that an external clock won't improve the sound of the Fireface, I clock mine with a Lucid SSG192 and I notice a difference. The sound is tighter and more defined with the lucid clock. Peace Marco
__________________ Sunflute |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What are the REAL advantages of the RME Fireface 800 over the RME Multiface II | HeatWAVS | Music computers | 26 | 18th February 2009 06:09 PM |
| RME Fireface 400 vs. Fireface 800 | heksu | High end | 10 | 23rd August 2006 02:42 PM |
| Anyone external clocking a fireface 800? | jazztone | So much gear, so little time! | 4 | 2nd July 2006 02:42 AM |
| RME Fireface 800 (RME does/outdoes MOTU) | MattiMattMatt | So much gear, so little time! | 3 | 19th April 2004 04:56 AM |
| |