![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 39
Thread Starter | Good Preamped signal to digital interface which already has its own preamps I'm going to purchase a new 8 ch Preamp (LineAudio MP8) to make my live recordings. I have heard good things about it. I have to insert it between the mics and the Digi 002 interface which feeds my MacBookPro with Logic. Now, I'm thinking that the first 4 input channels of Digi002, pass thru its own preamps (infact I saw on the block diagram that not only the xlr inputs, but also the line inputs go to the preamps), whereas the other 4 inputs (5 to 8) haven't preamps on their path.. In this way I realize that the first 4 channels of my recording will be preamped 2 times..... I tried feeding channel 1 and then channel 5 with same source signal and it seems that with Digi channel 1 gain to the minimum I get same amount of signal of channel 5... Can this mean that in this case input channel with preamp at minimum has similar behaviour of the preampless input? Or is there a better way to manage my situation? Tnx
__________________ Musicnet Studio Livorno - Italy |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Atlanta
Posts: 100
| What do ch. 1 -4 set to minimum gain sound like compared to ch. 5 - 8? If you need all 8 channels for live tracking then you aren't going to have a lot of choice in the matter. Mark |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Gear Head Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 39
Thread Starter | Quote:
But my question is: supposing ch 1 at minimum and ch 5 give you the same signal, do you think 1-4 chs change in any case their signal (maybe imperceptibly) owing to their preamps? | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 244
| If it sounds good, it is good. I feel like if you couldn't perceive a difference on a pair of decent monitors, then heck with it. If I were me, I would still put the less important tracks through those first four channels though.
__________________ |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Atlanta
Posts: 100
| I do not know the 002 but it stands to reason that ch. 1-4 are affected. Keep testing otherwise someone has more info on that unit. BTW, I'd be surprised if you get much of an answer at Sonik ... though it's possble. Mark |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Gear Head Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 39
Thread Starter | Quote:
| |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| audio interface with good preamps? | psymanprod | Low End Theory | 56 | 22nd September 2010 08:14 PM |
| £20000 to spend on 16 good preamps or 8 very good preamps | JustinFrench | High end | 14 | 5th January 2009 12:23 PM |
| analogue signal DB and digital signal DB | DominicWyeth | Mastering forum | 3 | 7th August 2008 10:43 AM |
| Splitting the Mic signal into 2 preamps?? | rob99 | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 1 | 15th December 2005 10:17 PM |
| any good digital interface for hedd192? | TWGENE | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 27th October 2005 08:30 AM |
| |