ART MPA gold tube swap question - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!

ART MPA gold tube swap question
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 25th July 2009   #1
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 11

Thread Starter
ART MPA gold tube swap question

Hello, fellow Gearslutz. I just got some NOS Motorola tubes, and am wondering if the metal caps surrounding the tubes are necessary to put back in? Pls help!! cheers
Gems Records is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2009   #2
Gear Guru
 
John Eppstein's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA.
Posts: 11,681

Depends on what you mean by "necessary" - if you like extra noise then by all means leave them off.......
John Eppstein is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2009   #3
Lives for gear
 
BOWIE's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ.
Posts: 3,397

They usually sap some of the high-frequency response so I recommend leaving them off so long as your tubes aren't picking up RF noise (which they usually won't). Try it both ways and see what works best for you.
__________________
"It's all about the application."

Tube information and sales: ProAudioTubes@aol.com
BOWIE is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2009   #4
Gear Guru
 
John Eppstein's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA.
Posts: 11,681

Quote:
Originally Posted by BOWIE View Post
They usually sap some of the high-frequency response so I recommend leaving them off so long as your tubes aren't picking up RF noise (which they usually won't). Try it both ways and see what works best for you.
Er, um, I beg your pardon?

RF shields sapping your high frequency response? No. That's like a green sharpie making your CDs sound better.

What they MIGHT do that perhaps you could interpret that way is that they might damp microphonic ringing in a marginally bad tube that, if it was very slight, might be misinterpreted as additional high end. You don't want microphonics in your tubes. It's not a good thing.
John Eppstein is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2009   #5
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 11

Thread Starter
Hello, again. The stock tubes in my MPA were horribly microphonic, which is why I wanted to replace them in the first place.

The metal shields certainly didn't prevent that.

Wouldn't their removal allow better heat dispersion?

My concern was that there are wires running disturbingly close to the tubes, and I would'nt want to harm them due to the heat.

Anyone know if it is harmful to the unit to remove them?

Also, I was under the impresion that RF sensitivity was a sign of a bad tube. Any thoughts?

cheers
James Iverson, producer
Gems Records | Great view, better sound.
Gems Records is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2009   #6
Lives for gear
 
BOWIE's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ.
Posts: 3,397

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Eppstein View Post
Er, um, I beg your pardon?

RF shields sapping your high frequency response? No. That's like a green sharpie making your CDs sound better.

What they MIGHT do that perhaps you could interpret that way is that they might damp microphonic ringing in a marginally bad tube that, if it was very slight, might be misinterpreted as additional high end. You don't want microphonics in your tubes. It's not a good thing.
Just to offer you some reading, I did a qick Google search and came up with several forum threads. Are all these people imagining this?
Tube Shields [Archive] - The Gear Page
Rig-Talk • View topic - Preamp tube shields making a difference in tone?
2 in one day! Those silver preamp tube shields ... [Archive] - The Gear Page
BOWIE is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2009   #7
Lives for gear
 
BOWIE's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ.
Posts: 3,397

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gems Records View Post
Wouldn't their removal allow better heat dispersion?

My concern was that there are wires running disturbingly close to the tubes, and I would'nt want to harm them due to the heat.

Anyone know if it is harmful to the unit to remove them?

Also, I was under the impresion that RF sensitivity was a sign of a bad tube. Any thoughts?
It's about equal w/ or w/o. The spring in the shield acts like a heat-sink which compensates for the lack of air-flow.

No, it's not harmful in that unit.

Sometimes, the wiring is an issue. I've seen gear that was sloppily put-together with wires touching the tubes, etc. Gently move them out of the way if you can.

RF sensitivity has more to do with design than a tube just being bad. Though, you are correct, some tubes will go bad and become sensitive to RF.
BOWIE is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2009   #8
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 11

Thread Starter
Just a quick thank you to Bowie.
much appreciate your candor

cheers
James Iverson, producer
Gems Records | Great view, better sound.
Gems Records is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2009   #9
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 258

Great initial question! I was wondering about this...How about this, I'll try it, and post the results?

Here we go:
tlm103 into an ART MPA Gold with Siemens und Halske Valvo NOS tube. First read with the shield, second read without the shield. I'm a voice over guy, so to accomodate you rock gurus I read a sentence from a technical program and then sing it really badly with whack dynamics - blustery, high and screamo, and then up close and growly. Enjoy.

http://www.lanceblair.net/files/ARTMPAShieldTest.wav

BTW, the MPA settings are High Voltage, Input 1 o'clock, Impedance 3 o'clock, and Output 2 o'clock.

Now I need to get a green sharpie, although my clients say they loved my upgrade from red to black.
toxostoma rufum is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2009   #10
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 258

LOL...thanks. Science In Chains, perhaps? I wanted to give you some different flavors in one short clip. I can't stand the "shootouts" here (and elsewhere) that involve someone droning on.

As for the sound...yeah, I hear more air too and less sibilance. I'm surprised. Everything was set the same and I measured my body positioning and axis and distance to the mic. If anything the tubes had slightly more time to warm up in the "covered" version which I did to make things more fair.

For me, the covers are staying off!
toxostoma rufum is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2009   #11
Gear maniac
 
CharlesCola's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 287

hi, tried Tungsol 12AX7 in the MPA Gold and it was absolutley superb - these are just new Russian made cheap tubes and could not beleive how smooth and nice they sounded.
CharlesCola is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
ART MPA Gold - Tube Assistance cooknkpl Low End Theory 152 19th December 2012 03:08 PM
Noob question about ART MPA Gold preamp at the back alexistkd Low End Theory 2 6th May 2009 06:20 PM
Art mpa gold or spl goldmike 9844, which is better tube preamp rajajoki Low End Theory 1 16th March 2007 09:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:56 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.