![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2004 Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 7,209
Thread Starter | a recording recipe (no big deal)
i'm not saying anything earth shattering here, but i just wanted to say that i tracked some electric guitars last week and i got a really great sound. i thought i'd share it w/ you folks. the sounds were mostly clean electric w/ complex chords resulting from some alternate tunings i made up myself (my alternate tunings are based on laziness... they're designed to make stuff easier to play --- it's not a sonic youth or joni mitchell "creative" alternate tuning thing). anyway, here was the chain. try this, if you're ever in the situation to do it, it sounded great to me. gibson sg -> tone king continental 2 -> wes dooley aea84 -> great river me1nv -> straight to tape. in the mix, compressed gently w/ a distressor. it resulted in a really vivid, articulate sound. try it sometime. i am now in love with the sg as a source for clean guitar sounds, despite its reputation as being a "crunch" guitar. - c |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2003 Location: Chicago
Posts: 711
|
I find that the really great sounding guitar recordings have a decent amp and a decent axe, and a decent or better mic, with a decent or better preamp and a GREAT player. I have the privledge of working with a few really great players, and their scratch tracks with a line 6 and a fender copy with a 57 in front of it sound amazing, while other guitarists will bring in a vintage axe and a vibrato king or boutique amp and their tracks will sound fine. Its all in the fingers, too bad my fingers are made of rocks. Frost |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2004 Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 7,209
Thread Starter | Quote:
-- c | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear nut Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 119
|
Since we're sharing, here's a recent guitar cab micing experience. I thought I'd try M/S micing for a rhythm guitar track. I also took a direct line in case it didn't work so that I could reamp later. The Mid-side thing wasn't quite working for me, adding more of the side was taking away too much of the [insert your favority overused studio descriptive term here. I'll go with punch or impact]. I was feeling too lazy to reamp, so I thought I'd try something different. The side was set up with the phase inverted on the left, so I brought in a little of the direct signal with the phase inverted on the right. Bingo. A wider stereo image with mono still preserved, and punchier than mid/side alone. Is there a term for this kind of thing? Mid/Side/Side? |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| nba? big deal | soultrane | The Moan Zone | 0 | 1st September 2006 09:26 PM |
| Preamps big deal? nah... | DirkB | High end | 41 | 3rd August 2005 05:41 PM |
| TIGER ...What's the big deal? | T_R_S | Music computers | 8 | 28th April 2005 04:13 PM |
| Subliminal Messages : What's the big deal? | e-cue | The Moan Zone | 10 | 29th July 2002 02:25 AM |
| |