Apple Sells 275,000 Songs in First 18 Hours - Page 3 - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!


Apple Sells 275,000 Songs in First 18 Hours

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10th June 2003   #61
Lives for gear
 
Johnny B's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 848

Well let me ask two qestions then.

1) Given the usual recording contract splits, not sure what the split between artist and label is in the UK and Europe, how much do you think the artist's share would be using the typical arrangements?

2) Now, what do you think would be a fair split?
Johnny B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th June 2003   #62
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Location: Bellingham, WA, USA
Posts: 319

Quote:
2) Now, what do you think would be a fair split?
That depends on whether I'm acting as the Artist or the Label!
Paul Turpin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th June 2003   #63
Lives for gear
 
Johnny B's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 848

Ok, what would fair for the label's share and what would be fair for the artist's share?
Johnny B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2003   #64
Motown legend
 
Bob Olhsson's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Songwriter Gulch, Nashville TN
Posts: 10,879

Most splits average out to 50 percent for the label and 50 percent for the artist/composer after expenses.

All of the cryptic language based on gross income and recoupment is a smokescreen to allow label execs., managers and lawyers to make deals appear to be something other than what they really are.
Bob Olhsson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2003   #65
Lives for gear
 
Johnny B's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 848

Yeah, but here there are no major expenses and usu the artist has to pay for all the costs, takes all the risks, and ends up in debt to the label company store. To me, it would seem a 60/40 split would be more fair with the artist getting the 60 percent.

Perhaps, the artist should get all of it, since Apple is effectively acting in the position of a record co distributor. In other words, the old label is not doing anything, why should they get anything?

Does anyone knpw if the labels paid Apple to be on their service or did Apple pay some kind of advance to the labels for some limited rights. If Apple made advance payments, how much will go to the artists?
Johnny B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2003   #66
Lives for gear
 
Johnny B's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 848

bump
Johnny B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th June 2003   #67
Motown legend
 
Bob Olhsson's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Songwriter Gulch, Nashville TN
Posts: 10,879

I did say AFTER expenses!

Any distributor, electronic or otherwise should be making half of the total investment in a title in order to deserve half the net profit from that title.
Bob Olhsson is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Completed song in 2 hours. ? ! wwjd Electronic Music Instruments & Electronic Music Production 0 7th April 2011 02:44 AM
Apple Sells it First million Videos T_R_S Music computers 8 9th November 2005 05:12 AM
7 songs in 11 hours lucey Work In Progress / Advice Requested / Show & Tell / Artist Showcase / Mix-Offs 23 6th July 2005 08:08 PM
Apple recalls 28,000 PowerBook batteries due to fire hazard Renie Music computers 0 25th August 2004 09:11 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:34 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.