Does external clocking make an audible difference? - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!


Does external clocking make an audible difference?

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 14th July 2009   #1
Lives for gear
 
The Marrvel's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 618

Thread Starter
Does external clocking make an audible difference?

Due to the limitations of the digital input of my macbook, I'm unable to use my API A2D as the master clock. I'm still able to record using the A/D of the API but the macbook is clocking everything.

If I were to purchase an interface that would allow me to use the A2D as the master, would I even notice an audible difference between that and the macbook internal clock?
The Marrvel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th July 2009   #2
Gear interested
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 14

Yes! I use a Big Ben. This Big Ben clock the ProTools HD3 Accel System. When I switch to the internal ProTools Clock I hear a muffled sound.

Try it!
Drumrecording is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th July 2009   #3
3 + infractions, forum membership suspended.
 
Joined: May 2009
Location: SJCap
Posts: 1,148

yes in general, but I'm not familar with the API clock. I assume it's a decent build.
glissando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th July 2009   #4
Gear Guru
 
theblue1's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 15,099

Clarification needed: are you running the A2D's analog outs into the MB?

Because if you're sending from the A2D's digital outs into the MB, the MB is presumably deriving embedded wordclock from the A2D.

With regard to whether you'll hear a difference, it's entirely possible -- under certain circumstances.

The most likely result, the experts[1, 2] us, of slaving a given converter to an external source is increased jitter in the slaved converter. However, since you're not apparently using the MB's converter at that point, the increased jitter in the MB converter would presumably not be an issue during tracking. (At least if I've had enough coffee this morning. ) Keep in mind, that if you're using multiple converters in tandem that you must have one master and slave other converters to that master source (which could either be one of the converters or a dedicated clock source like the Big Ben, Timepiece, etc).

Here's Dan Lavry on the notion of slaving to an external clock in order to 'improve' the sound: Will clocking MOTU 828 mkI to Mytek Stereo192 improve DA of 828?
theblue1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th July 2009   #5
Lives for gear
 
Alex Specht's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 706

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Marrvel View Post
A/D of the API but the macbook is clocking everything.
Seems that you are not actually clocking the API off the Macbook, rather the Macbook it automatically adjusting to what its being fed (via SPDIF with optical adapter i assume).

An interface with WC, AES would theoretically make for a more stable clock sync between devices.

Or you could try to send the output of the Macbook into the spdif input of the API and see if it will actually sync to the Mackbook.

Are you seeing the "external sync" light of the API coming on?
__________________
Quote:
The tide of amateurism cannot but recede, until there will be left only the mechanical device and the professional executant.
- John Philip Sousa, 1906
Alex Specht is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th July 2009   #6
Lives for gear
 
The Marrvel's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 618

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by theblue1 View Post
Clarification needed: are you running the A2D's analog outs into the MB?
No, I'm using digital. The A2D spdif output is being converted through an M-Audio CO2 coax/optical converter into the optical input of the Macbook. The folks at API already told me that the Macbook's built-in soundcard won't be able to set the A2D as the clock source and that another interface will have to be used. I just don't want to spend money on a brand new interface if using the API as the clock source won't really improve the sound.

After viewing the links that you sent me, I gather that perhaps it won't improve?
The Marrvel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th July 2009   #7
Lives for gear
 
heyman's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 2,769

Marvel, the nice thing about your setup is that it is portable. Take your rig into a dealer and try out that big ben.. See if it makes a diffrence. That way you havent spent dime one to test it out.
__________________
Best quote ever....!
Posted by Infernal Device..

"Guitar Center....
Even the good news is in the moan zone."
heyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th July 2009   #8
Gear Guru
 
John Eppstein's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA.
Posts: 10,213

Quote:
Originally Posted by heyman View Post
Marvel, the nice thing about your setup is that it is portable. Take your rig into a dealer and try out that big ben.. See if it makes a diffrence. That way you havent spent dime one to test it out.
You're missing the point of the question - he already has a clock source, which he can't use. He needs a new INTERFACE, not a new clock - with the current setup he couldn't use the Big Ben anyway.

To the OP - yes, you need to buy a REAL interface instead of the onboard generic crap.
John Eppstein is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th July 2009   #9
Gear addict
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 411

Any firewire interface that can be clocked off the A2D should work. I am not completely clued in regarding what is available, but you should be able to pick up an mbox or mbox equivalent fairly cheaply.
Butcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th July 2009   #10
Lives for gear
 
Slikjmuzik's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 2,699

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Eppstein View Post
You're missing the point of the question - he already has a clock source, which he can't use. He needs a new INTERFACE, not a new clock - with the current setup he couldn't use the Big Ben anyway.

To the OP - yes, you need to buy a REAL interface instead of the onboard generic crap.
Eppstein's right, minimally you need an interface with a Spdif input which takes in the digital information as well as spits out a clock source at the same time which the interface should offer the option to clock to the Spdif input. Even more ideal is if the interface had a Wordclock input and output (BNC).
__________________
Julian
Ear Candy Studios
www.earcandystudios.com

It's the indian, not the arrow...

Last edited by Slikjmuzik; 14th July 2009 at 10:11 PM.. Reason: change some words
Slikjmuzik is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
any audible difference among popular splitters? hollywood_steve Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 17 21st May 2010 03:59 AM
Audible Difference? ocelot12 Electronic Music Instruments & Electronic Music Production 3 14th May 2008 11:46 PM
Audible difference upgrading converters with my gear? Brian Scherzer So much gear, so little time! 1 2nd April 2008 05:36 AM
Audible difference between sm57 & sm58? mortlar Low End Theory 15 3rd August 2007 10:41 PM
Schoeps CMC6 vs. CMC6XT - any audible sound difference ? ISedlacek High end 4 5th October 2004 11:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:34 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.