M-Theory and harmonics

[FeatheredSerpent]

So eventually science gets around to explaining the basic energy concepts that have been known to man for thousands of years, which is great!

There are lots of musical analogies being used, which basically imply that everything is a waveform, from the simple to the complex, based aorund a large and mutable pool of oscillators.

I've always thought that the reason music or even just sound in general is capable of invoking such profound and 'divine' reactions in people (and animals), is because it is such an accurate mirror of universal forces and principles in general, when I resolve it to my personal belief system, which isn't new.
But now the interesting thing is that it is more acceptable for the scientific community to explore the possibilities of further dimensions and also parallel universes.
These two things could have been demonstrated to them a long time ago if they were willing to open their minds to that possibility without needing a matching equation but that's another discussion

So this means studying the motion and effect of energy passing through those parallel universes.
They have all ready figured out that gravity may well be one of those forces that bleeds through to other universes (see, the audio analogies just come so naturally!), and I'm thinking that sound is most likely another one of them.

If strings are oscillators, atoms are fundamentals, cells are 3rd harmonics and so on, figuratively speaking, and the strings/oscs are all ready vibrating at frequencies well beyond the upper range of human hearing, and the complexity of the waveforms (life/intelligence) is dependent on those oscillators, then the most complex waveforms or lifeforms should be emitting super high order harmonics shouldn't they?

Isn't there a case for pursuing the highest possible samplerates maybe, not to try and record sound we 'might' hear, but to record energy.

Maybe even trace back to the fundamental and work out what frequencies strings are vibrating at.

This seems to me to be a hell of a lot easier than throwing particles at each other and hoping to catch sight of a single kind of string before it disappears.

Anyone with me, or have I been smoking too much again?







But if we take that further,
I was thinking about sample rates, and whether it would be possible to uncover a dimension using sound.

[filin]

[FeatheredSerpent]

[FeatheredSerpent]

there it went!

[N88]

Originally Posted by FeatheredSerpent

Maybe even trace back to the fundamental and work out what frequencies strings are vibrating at.

The ancient Chinese considered this 'source of light, the center to which everything is attracted' to be F natural.

You might enjoy Alain Danielou.

[FeatheredSerpent]

Just looked at his 'official' website - the Alain Daniélou centre one. Looks very interesting, will have to get a couple fo those books.

I just got a book called 'This is Your Brain on Music' by Daniel Levitin, who was a session musician/producer turned neuroscientist, should be interesting reading as well.

But no more takers on string theory and music? I thought more people might be interested in it.. I realised that they are in fact doing exactly what I described all ready by sending out radio frequencies in a hope of attracting attention (because this is all based around the insatiable desire to find out who else is 'out there' after all), but now with M theory, they think that rather than extend a transmission out to the known universe, they need to pierce this single universal membrane and send a 'shock-wave' to neighbouring parallel universes, in the same way they suspect the forces of gravity do.

What sort of amplification do they use for sending out these radio frequencies currently, and on what wavelengths, does anybody know?

[theblue1]

Intuition and brain-storming are great things... but one has to be on guard about going off half-cocked or drawing tight analogies where vague and broad analogies may already be over-stretched.

But if one balances intuition and a rigorous scientific approach, moderating and guiding the former with the latter, great things can be accomplished.

[FeatheredSerpent]

The analogies fit pefectly with little effort though The actual theory itself is unproven of course, although they're certainly not holding back on the investment of particle accelerators so with that kind of money involved, there must be enough people around that think it's worth pursuing.

It fits in so many ways, not leaswt because it has the potential to tie in all psychic activity, astral projection, form a scientific common bond between countless meta-physical philosophies etc, could even explain what happens to core life enrgy when someone dies, and uncover the medium through which all energy travels, so it's pretty huge, and it just makes sense on so many different levels.

It's the first scentific theory (although it's being hotly debated whether in fact it's scence at all or rather a philosphy itself, but then the sooner the general scientific community get to grips with the fact that they are pretty much destined to become one and the same thing, the better) that I can resolve to my own spiritual beliefs with the minimum of fuss, which is why I'm particularly fascinated by it.

For me the Unification theory doesn't mean many scientific theories coming under one roof, it means pretty much everybody being able to get on board under a common banner, no matter whether they are scientists or spiritualists, and that would be one of the most important steps for mankind, which would basically be to unveil the workings of the 'Mind', as a seperate entity to the brain.

You're right though, it's all about finding the balance, but this is the most balanced theory to date.