Vocal compression on mixdown - what do you do? - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!

Vocal compression on mixdown - what do you do?
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 21st June 2005   #1
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: England
Posts: 11

Thread Starter
Vocal compression on mixdown - what do you do?

For a while now I've been mixing vocals by adding a healthy dose of high frequency EQ an then compressing it in a dbx160. Is this the best way to go, or would I get better results from an 1176 or LA-2A plug-in on a UAD-1 card? Or something else entirely? What do you do?
waterside is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2005   #2
Gear Guru
 
thethrillfactor's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 14,175

Quote:
Originally Posted by waterside
For a while now I've been mixing vocals by adding a healthy dose of high frequency EQ an then compressing it in a dbx160. Is this the best way to go, or would I get better results from an 1176 or LA-2A plug-in on a UAD-1 card? Or something else entirely? What do you do?
Yes.
thethrillfactor is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2005   #3
One with big hooves
 
Jay Kahrs's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2002
Location: Earth, NYC metro
Posts: 5,898
My Recordings/Credits

Send a message via AIM to Jay Kahrs Send a message via Skype™ to Jay Kahrs
I use my ears and process accordingly...going by what the rest of the track sounds like and figuring out what's needed to make the vocal sit in the mix or pop out of the mix.

Sometimes I'll compress and EQ the hell out of it, sometimes I use mild compression and no EQ and yet other times I'll use lots of EQ and little to no compression. Once in a while I'll need a de-esser in there (usually pre-compression) and sometimes I'll parallel compress the lead vocal. So 'ya see...it all depends...

You'll get different results by using different gear and you'll also get different results by using what you have now in a different way. Either set of results might be good or might be bad for the project and only you can decide what's right...that's why I always say YMMV.
__________________
J. 'Moose' Kahrs
producer|mixer|recordist
MooseAudio.com
mooseaudio.bandcamp.com
Quote:
All you need to make a record is a mic, some tape and maybe some bad reverb...
Jay Kahrs is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2005   #4
84K
Lives for gear
 
84K's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: right coast
Posts: 3,857

Slam it till you draw blood, then add one more compressor! EQ the vocal till it sounds great pre compressors and then EQ again post compression to clean up artifacts added by the compressors. Start with 2 compressors, be ready to use 4. IN YOUR FACE

84K is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2005   #5
GPl
Lives for gear
 
GPl's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,615

You are scaring me. This is not for the faint of heart
__________________
Michael Scott
---------------------------------------------

"Two degrees in bebop, a PHD in swing, he's the master of rhythm, he's a rock and roll king" -Lowell George-

AMP WIZARD "Forest Gumble" "When the air becomes electric....It's like a box of chocolates"
GPl is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2005   #6
Lives for gear
 
steins's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Posts: 697

Quote:
Originally Posted by waterside
For a while now I've been mixing vocals by adding a healthy dose of high frequency EQ an then compressing it in a dbx160. Is this the best way to go, or would I get better results from an 1176 or LA-2A plug-in on a UAD-1 card? Or something else entirely? What do you do?
It all depends on the style of the music and the vocalist. I almost always seem to end up using a STC-8 for level control when tracking, and a HW 1176 or LA2A at mixdown, depening on how we want the track to sound.

If I had more HW compressors to choose from, I guess the answer would be different. I'd like to try the dbx160 sometime.

BTW, I always find HW compressors to be better than plugins. After the HW comps, the Waves RenComp is rather nice.

Stein Tore
steins is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2005   #7
84K
Lives for gear
 
84K's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: right coast
Posts: 3,857

Pendulum Vari-mu > 1176 or Distressor > Atomic Squeezebox = my nice chain ( in most cases ). Knowing the boxes first is important. Gain structure is very important. That is the key... If you do it right, you will have a very in-your-face vocal sound without sounding over compressed. And that seems to be the sound of today for most popular music styles.

it hard, but don't dfegad on it. That is the key.
84K is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2005   #8
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 799

Try the global thermonuclear nibnob.
jonnyclueless is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
CLA Vocal Compression msrecprod High end 33 31st August 2008 06:10 PM
Best software Plug in(Au) for vocal compression ? insect1 Music Computers 1 16th August 2006 09:18 AM
Vocal Compression Ectobeats Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 11 13th February 2006 11:26 PM
For vocal compression -Tracking or Mixing? blue_scorpion High end 12 31st January 2006 09:40 PM
vocal rides and compression beatzz Music Computers 8 20th August 2005 03:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:19 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.