![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DIGI003 Rack | nickrezni | So much gear, so little time! | 4 | 27th May 2008 09:05 PM |
| Question for friend re: Octopre/Digi003 lightpipe config. | James 'LA' Lugo | So much gear, so little time! | 2 | 14th November 2007 04:51 PM |
| SSL X-Rack users, feedback ? | cosmos | High end | 148 | 30th August 2007 11:47 AM |
| powerbook g4 with protools digi 002 rack users | georgedk | Music computers | 2 | 9th July 2004 07:54 AM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear addict Join Date: May 2003 Location: socal
Posts: 335
| digi003 rack plus users! ....question? now that the rack plus comes with 8 built in mic pre's, would you say the 003 converters and those pre's have been improved to the level of say a presonus digimax96 or LT? thanks |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 300
| We have a stock 003 rack 1 year old. The 4 pres on board are probably as good as the ones you mentioned, although we haven't tried the new ones. For 'serious' recording, outboard pres through the direct inputs are always better, but keyboards and maybe drums would be OK. |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Gear addict Join Date: May 2003 Location: socal
Posts: 335
| Quote:
the 001 and 002 pre's IMO werent very usable not even for extra pre's when recording drums. .. if the 003's pre's/converters are on the same level as the digimax (for example) to me, that would be considered very usable and eliminates the need for an additional 8 channel mic pre/converter? If i can get an idea from folks using the 003, I'm thinkin about trading up from the 001 to the 003 and wonder how good the new digi pre's/converters are these days? thanks | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 300
| For all the bashing 003's, M-boxes and M-Audio stuff with PTLE gets around here, the convertors on the 003 are clean and reliable. If it's ultra high end, we'd have to spend more than the cost of a DIGI 192 system for Prism, Benchmark or Aurora's. The pre's are clean and translate the incoming signal accurately. If you get 8 pres on the newest one, use maybe a couple of MA5's with comps to 2 direct channels for critical stuff, and the other six for everything else. JMHO |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Virginia
Posts: 853
| Quote:
__________________ www.symphonicsound.com | |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |