Focal Solo6 Be's (too much low mids!!) - Page 2 - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!

Focal Solo6 Be's (too much low mids!!)
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 25th November 2008   #31
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Cowboy California
Posts: 556

Look, I love my Focal Twin 6be's. I recently went to a studio that had event ASP 8's, ironically the kind I previously owned, and dammit, they were harsher than hell! My ****ing ears were ringin after 1 hour! I listen to my focals for hours and feel fine. Now, my complaints are that of other owners, they do distort with some synth sounds. Primarily those that have a whole lot of information across the frequency spectrum. It DOES GET ON MY NERVES. SIMON, can you explain???
youngmain is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th November 2008   #32
Lives for gear
 
Dopamine's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,001

Thread Starter
<< your main broadband reference should be really nice, and reference material should sound glorious on them. >>

Gotta agree with Peeder on this one. I don't want to hear issues with my favorite mixes.
Dopamine is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th November 2008   #33
Lives for gear
 
DSD_Mastering's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,923

If anyone can't get a good sound out of the Focals, then something else is broken. Either your room sucks or you have a console that is creating comb filtering or something!
We have Twin6's as the L/R and Solo6's as C/LS/RS with Sub and it's the best sound I've ever gotten in my room!


Regards,
Bruce
__________________
Bruce A. Brown
Puget Sound Studios
Seattle, Washington
DSD_Mastering is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th November 2008   #34
Lives for gear
 
strewnshank's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,604

Quote:
Originally Posted by j-madd View Post
I personally find the information in the low-mids to be of great value when mixing, but my speakers are about 10 feet away (about 1/3rd depth of my room) from my front wall, so we may not be talking about the same amount of emphasis. This is the very reason I like these monitors as my old mixes had too much going on in this area. Also, It's really important to have treatment on the parallel walls between you and the speakers to decrease reflection. I am happy with the solo 6's, but they may not suite your ears. Everyone hears a little differently.

Justin
This is my position exactly. I do find the low-mids to be significantly more present than on my previous speakers (event 20/20's), however, I certainly don't find it to be a hinderance. I am feeling a little lost on the sub 50hz frequencies, so I think I'll be adding the sub soon.
__________________
Chris Thomas
Chris@strewnshank.com
"facts are stupid things" -Ronald Reagan

Strewnshank Youtube Page
Strewnshank.com
presskit.to/strewnshank
strewnshank is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th November 2008   #35
70% Coffee, 30% Beer
 
Doc Mixwell's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Location: Quincy, MA
Posts: 9,136

Send a message via Skype™ to Doc Mixwell
Quote:
Originally Posted by peeder View Post
A dealer can rely on a variety of psychological and practical side effects telling people to do entire mixes on a system before judging it.
What are you talking about? You have to listen to the monitors to judge them correct?
__________________
Adam Brass
adam@dspdoctor.com


DSPdoctor.com

"Where High End is Still King"


__________________
"Any opinions above are worth exactly what you paid for them."
Anonymous

"If I find 10,000 ways something won't work, I haven't failed. I am not discouraged, because every wrong attempt discarded is another step forward.
Thomas Edison

RTFM
Doc Mixwell is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th November 2008   #36
Lives for gear
 
Sui_City's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: South of South
Posts: 820

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dopamine View Post
<< your main broadband reference should be really nice, and reference material should sound glorious on them. >>

Gotta agree with Peeder on this one. I don't want to hear issues with my favorite mixes.
Sorry, but that argument is flawed.

What happens if there are in fact issues in your favourite mixes?

Just because you think it is a good mix, doesn't mean it actually is.
Sui_City is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th November 2008   #37
Lives for gear
 
mdjice's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2008
Location: Houston/Paris
Posts: 2,679

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sui_City View Post
Sorry, but that argument is flawed.

What happens if there are in fact issues in your favourite mixes?

Just because you think it is a good mix, doesn't mean it actually is.
+1
mdjice is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2008   #38
Lives for gear
 
Dopamine's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,001

Thread Starter
<< Sorry, but that argument is flawed. What happens if there are in fact issues in your favourite mixes? Just because you think it is a good mix, doesn't mean it actually is. >>

I have a reference cd of songs I know well and have been listening to for years in professional studios. I know exactly how they should sound. On the Focals I have the urge to put a dip in the lo-mids.
Dopamine is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2008   #39
Gear Head
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 50

I've heard the Solo's in a couple different environments and felt that they were tubby in the low-mids, so you're not alone. I loved the detail in the highs but the lower freqs did not sound right to my ears.

Then I auditioned the Twins and fell in love They had the detail of the solos but they were much more balanced in the lows and low-mids.
Juan2daPaab is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2008   #40
PC Moderator
 
George Necola's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Winterthur, Switzerland
Posts: 8,509
My Recordings/Credits

Send a message via Skype™ to George Necola
you can't hear the distortion of the new metallica CD on Focal solo 6... there is no detail in the highs.. there is something wrong there..

something is phasy.. it sounds like chhhhhhrzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz (that describes the highend very well)

cheers
__________________
Quote:
"recording engineers don't die, they are dragged into the grave by the shear weight of their balls."
Malcolm Chisholm
---------------------------------------------
www.georgenecola.com produce & mix itm/gear & fun
blog.georgenecola.com reviews & gear
soundcloud.com

twitter
George Necola is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2008   #41
Lives for gear
 
tomdarude's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: germany
Posts: 1,730

Quote:
Originally Posted by George Necola View Post
you can't hear the distortion of the new metallica CD on Focal solo 6... there is no detail in the highs.. there is something wrong there..

something is phasy.. it sounds like chhhhhhrzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz (that describes the highend very well)

cheers


George... Honey

hi-end phasey on the focals?? but you like adam´s ??? WTF are you hearing?

that death-metal stuff is doin your ears no good...lol


you got no clue, but I love you anyway!!
when the hell will you be over here, we must sit down and chat soon

cheers
__________________
"You'd be surprised that "f*ck it!" can be a profound philosophy."
picksail; 28th August 2008, 08:55 AM


"The best sounding sluttiest gear of all time... is a great song" --Greg Wells



http://www.hi-endgear.com


http://www.audio-import.de
tomdarude is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2008   #42
PC Moderator
 
George Necola's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Winterthur, Switzerland
Posts: 8,509
My Recordings/Credits

Send a message via Skype™ to George Necola
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomdarude View Post


George... Honey

hi-end phasey on the focals?? but you like adam´s ??? WTF are you hearing?

that death-metal stuff is doin your ears no good...lol


you got no clue, but I love you anyway!!
when the hell will you be over here, we must sit down and chat soon

cheers
Mr. Tom,

I hope for Focal that there is something wrong with my pair.. come over and listen. something is very wrong

youu have to come to SWIZZZ

cheers
George Necola is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2008   #43
70% Coffee, 30% Beer
 
Doc Mixwell's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Location: Quincy, MA
Posts: 9,136

Send a message via Skype™ to Doc Mixwell
Quote:
Originally Posted by George Necola View Post
Mr. Tom,

I hope for Focal that there is something wrong with my pair.. come over and listen. something is very wrong

youu have to come to SWIZZZ

cheers
George,

I think there is something wrong with your speakers,

There is absolutely nothing wrong with the top end on the solo's I have at my project studio. They are the least ear fatiguing [40hz-40K] monitors I have ever heard.
Doc Mixwell is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2008   #44
PC Moderator
 
George Necola's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Winterthur, Switzerland
Posts: 8,509
My Recordings/Credits

Send a message via Skype™ to George Necola
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roc Mixwell View Post
George,

I think there is something wrong with your speakers,

There is absolutely nothing wrong with the top end on the solo's I have at my project studio. They are the least ear fatiguing [40hz-40K] monitors I have ever heard.
they just do not represent the sound (highs and low mids) very well.

the same as the SM8.. the SM8 sound boxy.

hm.. maybe I am not a Focal-guy (no LOVE FOR THE FRENCH!)

today, my birthday..be patient with me

cheers
George Necola is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2008   #45
Lives for gear
 
mdjice's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2008
Location: Houston/Paris
Posts: 2,679

Quote:
Originally Posted by George Necola View Post
they just do not represent the sound (highs and low mids) very well.

the same as the SM8.. the SM8 sound boxy.

hm.. maybe I am not a Focal-guy (no LOVE FOR THE FRENCH!)

today, my birthday..be patient with me

cheers
Happy birthday.!!!...even though I AM A FRENCH !!!
mdjice is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2008   #46
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Cowboy California
Posts: 556

Revised: If worst come to worst, I will have to ship mine off for repair! I hope not, but I conducted a mono bass test a lil over a week ago and one of my twins has a very slight rattle that my other twin doesn't. I am getting some more bass traps to make sure my room is playing a major role here. I know their are no rattles in my room but dips in the room can maybe distort my hearing. Im starting to think they aren't built for music with lots of low end but my tests have only begun.

Mind you this particular bass guitar has plenty of mid low range detail. Goes to figure.
youngmain is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2008   #47
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,107

That's a faulty driver issue. There were some. There won't be any more apparently. You'll know if yours have this problem. It's not subtle.
Jack Ruston is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2008   #48
Gear addict
 
van Overhalen's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 355

Quote:
Originally Posted by masterblaster View Post
I don't like the extra thick lo-mids in the Focals... I find the top end odd as well.

My room is treated.
Same here.
van Overhalen is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th December 2009   #49
Gear Head
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 65

hmm... very interesting threat.
please continue stike
pronto is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th December 2009   #50
Lives for gear
 
Dopamine's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,001

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by pronto View Post
hmm... very interesting threat.
please continue stike
Update: i moved my studio to a new location and the CR is much larger. I consulted with an acoustician, invested many more thick bass traps, and set up everything optimally.

Guess what? I still hate the way they sound. I finally got the IK Multimedia ARC system. Sure enough, it confirmed what I hear and did drastic cutting on the lower mids.. and a slight boost on the top.

Now they sound listenable, but only with the drastic ARC curve.
Dopamine is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th December 2009   #51
Gear Head
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 65

thanks for your long-term review.

greets
pronto is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th December 2009   #52
3 + infractions, forum membership suspended.
 
Joined: May 2009
Location: SJCap
Posts: 1,148

Quote:
Originally Posted by peeder View Post
What I find is the dealers push hardest the products that need the promotion the most.

For instance, have you ever seen a dealer push GML? I can't remember the last time I heard a dealer yelling at people to buy GML. If you try GML you really don't need to try anything else. People who sell GML are really just distributors.

But Focal? Now that's where hard-sellers earn their pay. Go stick it to'em boys! Move those puppies, those cretins out there won't know the difference! It's not their money, IT'S YOURS! GRAB IT!
You don't need to try anything else besides GML?....please.....that's like saying because every high end studio has a manley Vari Mu that you don't need any other compressor. Ridiculous and use them a lot less than other pieces of gear kicking around....just like an SSL Bus compressor it's great when it works, but it works great maybe 15% of the time. I can't believe you posted that.

I 've mixed one project on a pair of focals and I have to say I don't "like" the way they sound HOWEVER they translate very well and they make you work to get your mix sounding good...which is a good thing as speakers that flatter can mislead you for hours...I like having both. Focals to to the grunt work and others to flatter the client when they walk in later.
glissando is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2011   #53
Lives for gear
 
Arksun's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: Cotswolds, UK
Posts: 1,439

Very surprising thread, just when I thought everyone sung the praises of the Focals.

Mine is a bedroom studio too, some acoustic treatment but not as much as I'd like/can fit.

I'm curious if everyone thats experiencing the low-mid bump has them closer to a boundary wall?.

When you say low-mid, what sort of freq range exactly?.
__________________
Music Producer | Sound Designer
http://www.arksun-sound.com
Arksun is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 15th May 2011   #54
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: NYC/LA
Posts: 1,636

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reg View Post
Look who just crawled out of the wood work to give all of us a lesson on what's good and what's not.
That post is 3 years old as are most in this thread

I worked in a spot with some focal twins for a few days- Nice. However, I don't think I would purchase them if I was in the market for some new monitors.
PopularDemand is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 16th May 2011   #55
Gear addict
 
j-madd's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 402

I've had no issues w my solos. They give a good amt of low/mid info, but in a good way.

Sent from my DROIDX using Gearslutz.com App
__________________
Justin Madden

Follow me on twitter: @jmadd5000
j-madd is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 16th May 2011   #56
fdc
Gear Head
 
fdc's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 51

Send a message via Skype™ to fdc
now i read this thread i´m gonna sell my focal solos.

anyway i dont have any problems with them. mixing became so easy on my solos...dirty mixes, clean mixes...no problem...they sit on recoils on my desk. room is full with basskillers. could need some more but all good. best speakers i´ve ever had. mixes translate well. so what could i need more?
also my mixes normally have more lowmid than the average mixes i listen to on my speakers. my style. so if there would be too much low mids from the speakers, my mixes would lack low mids on every other system. or?
fdc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 16th May 2011   #57
Lives for gear
 
Tube World's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Franklin TN
Posts: 2,409

I have one problem with the Focal Solo's and Twins; with the mid forward sound...it does help mix the mid freq's which are very busy with lot's of instruments and voices. The problem is when you play back your music on a stereo the mid's are no longer forward since most stereos don't push the mid's forward. They are blended in with the high's and low's. The mid's lack the soaring vocals or lead solo forwardness you were trying to get while mixing. It's there on the Focals but not in your mixes on different sources.

I like the PMC TB2A's and even the Genelec 8050's better. At least with both of these monitors when you push the mid's forward, the mid's are still forward when you play back on other sources.
Tube World is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th May 2011   #58
GMR
Gear addict
 
GMR's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Location: Montreal Canada

that's why you must try in your room before you buy and that's what i did. tried them for 5 days and really like them, and returned them. tried something else
GMR is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Focal Solo6 Krank So much gear, so little time! 40 5th May 2011 08:33 AM
Focal Twin6 BE's iangomes High end 31 30th May 2009 05:00 AM
Clicks and Pops through Focal Twin Be's dogma Geekslutz forum 3 22nd October 2007 10:33 PM
Purchase Adam a7's w/ sub8 or Focal Solo6 Be's fr0st Low End Theory 2 3rd May 2007 07:41 AM
FOCAL SOLO6 in NJ, NC, GA, FL??? russellwolff So much gear, so little time! 0 19th February 2007 09:08 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:35 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.