![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2003 Location: Kansas City
Posts: 665
Thread Starter | Twin Reverb or Deluxe Reverb for Rhodes
I'm keeping my eyes open for a Stage 73 Mark I Rhodes and am wondering about amps. The 22 watts of a Fender Deluxe Reverb 65 reissue seems much more manageable in my studio than an 85 watt Twin Reverb. I have heard though that 22 watts is not enough for the Rhodes and that it is not good for the amp to run a Rhodes through an amp of that size. I'd also be using this amp for guitar of course and it's only for the studio. I'm afraid the Twin is way too loud, but I don't want to go with the Deluxe if it's not enough amp for the Rhodes. I'd love to hear your thoughts. Thanks. Brad |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear |
hi brad - those are both guitar amps, and i would worry that hard hit low notes from the rhodes might distort on you. i would be looking for a dedicated keyboard amp. i could be wrong here, but i know my synth and old 73 were too much for my guitar amp.
__________________ jnorman sunridge studios salem, oregon |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 561
|
Fender Bassman could be killer for that as well.
|
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear Guru Joined: Feb 2004 Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 10,229
|
What jnorman says -- but between the two. It's no contest. Twin. If you HAD to.
__________________ All the best, Henry Robinett http://www.henryrobinett.com/ http://soundcloud.com/henry-robinett |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2003 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 5,582
|
Twin all the way! Fender actually voiced the Rhodes for the Twin Reverb...at least that's what I read. On second thought you may want to look at the new Princeton Reverb reissue. It's even smaller and more manageable and will have much of the same tone as the Deluxe. It sounds huge if you hook it up to any larger 2x12 or 4x12 cab. If you like that super clean sparkly Rhodes tone then you might just want to get a REDDI and be done with it. On my band's last record I reamped all our Rhodes through my Twin Reverb. On the record I'm doing right now I decided to just use the REDDI DI. I only reamped bass parts. Brad
__________________ plotagainstrachel.bandcamp.com Little Red Wagon Studios How to integrate your analog tape deck with your DAW: http://youtu.be/bswx5zrFRl0 http://youtu.be/W-II32AvVd8 |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2003 Location: Kansas City
Posts: 665
Thread Starter |
Thanks, all. I think I'll keep my eyes open for a Rhodes and a Twin.
|
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2007 Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,273
|
Twin, hands down. I don't think it's a "if I had to" circumstance. It's just a great amp for a Rhodes. I don't know about Fender voicing the Rhodes for the Twin (it wouldn't surprise me), but it is typically the amp that was paired with the Twin when the Rhodes was made. I don't think you usually saw dedicated keyboard amps of that vintage, because there just weren't a lot of keyboard options back then. You do need the extra power and speaker area of a Twin for the low notes. It's pretty hard to make a Twin distort. Try one out first if you can. I don't think you'll be disappointed. Oh, BTW, see if you can get a Showman or Dual Showman instead. These are the head versions of essentially the same amp. You'll have more versatility if you can swap out speaker cabinets, and the Twin weighs a ton.
__________________ - It looks just like a Telefunken U47 - with leather. You'll love it ... - Jazz is not dead - it just smells funny. - It doesn't make much difference how the paint is put on as long as something has been said. Technique is just a means of arriving at a statement. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear maniac Joined: May 2003
Posts: 232
|
I had a Rhodes Suitcase for years and also a Twin reverb. The twin doesn't have the warmth, roudness and thickness the suitcase amp has. You might think it sounds nice on a twin, but not after you listen to a suitcase. I've always been skeptical about this rumour that the Rhodes was designed with the Twin in mind.
|
| | |
| | #9 |
| Gear addict Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 349
|
Twin sounds fabulous. Gives it a nice brightness that isn't there in the direct signal or a keyboard amp. Don't believe the hype, just cuz it's a "guitar amp" doesn't matter. It sounds great, and it's been done a million times.. It's a very different sound from the suitcase. The suitcase has stereo tremolo which is pretty much God's gift to warm keyboard sounds. The Twin is much brighter and puts the Rhodes in a slightly different register. Great for soloing, and it can distort if you want it to (all about gain staging and how you play the Rhodes). The Twin makes the Rhodes stand out, bringing out the tines, more while the suitcase's amp makes it blend in more. Another nice thing about the Twin is the spring reverb, which sounds great on Rhodes. It's a classic sound, you should be able to work with it just fine! Rhodes through a twin: Think Chick Corea circa 1970s, and that's the sound. Rhodes suitcase with tremolo: I always think of Richard Tee on Roberta Flack's "I'm The One." |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear Head Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 42
|
i'm wondering that nobody yet mentioned the ROLAND JAZZ CHORUS. it's a fantastical amp for rhodes. very clean, super belly if you like and good reverb and a superb stereo-chorus/vibrato. in the good old days, all the rhodes stage were tested one twinreverbs, so they are also the amps the rhodes is built for. it really depends on your idea of the sound and your playing style! sometimes i like my MK1 best just straight through a good DI-box! cheers c |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Gear addict Joined: Aug 2007 Location: san antonio,texas
Posts: 418
|
2 Twins would be even cooler.
|
| | |
| | #12 |
| Banned Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,099
|
Man! A Twin hands down because you need ALL of those 85 watts! A suitcase has un-believeable amounts of low end WHOMP. I'd think that a dual 15" Fender cab with a Showman or a Dual Showman would be in the same realm. You could make the ow notes on a suitcase feedback quite easily! Maybe it is because the Rhodes suitcase KYBD was physically connected to the amp cab, but you could FEEL your low notes! |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2003 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 5,582
|
The bassist in my band actually plays a Fender Rhodes (well we sold the Rhodes 73 for a Nord Electro...damn club stairs) through an old Traynor YBA-2 Custom Special that I modded for 6550's. She plays that into a Traynor 8x10...predecessor to the Ampeg 8x10 supposedly. Tons of low end. We actually don't have a proper bassist. It's all Rhodes. Where does this myth that you can't distort a Twin Reverb come from??? That's complete hogwash. If you plug a P90 or humbucker equipped guitar into the #1 input of the reverb channel you will get breakup anywhere over 3.2 on the volume, which is about the same point that the amp starts to get some balls in my opinion. I'm talking about a non-master volume AB763 circuit here with good tubes properly biased. Now the normal channel on the Twin Reverb...that actually can go to about 4 or 5 before it will break up. I've found that the Twin Reverb breaks up at about the same point on the volume knob as any other Fender amp with reverb (extra gain stage). It's just a hell of a lot louder. Twin Reverbs are either off or LOUD! Brad |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,620
|
In 1974, I had a Fender Rhodes suitcase model with TWO fender twin reverb amps. It sounded great. If only I still had it!
|
| | |
| | #15 |
| Gear interested Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2
|
Twin by far! I have not found a better amp for keyboards. Crisp. clean, clear sound. 85 Watts, for great presence. The '65 Twin reissue is it! The very characteristics which make it a limited guitar amp, makes it perfect for, say, electric piano. These things don't break up man!
|
| | |
| | #16 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2006 Location: Black Gnat, Kentucky
Posts: 1,441
|
We always used a '69 Twin for our 88. Sounded great.
|
| | |
| | #17 |
| Gear maniac Joined: May 2009 Location: Montreal
Posts: 266
|
i have a rhodes coming in. i also have a silver face 77 twin reverb. good match? or are you guys talking about the black face? vintage vs. reissue??
|
| | |
| | #18 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2008 Location: secluded tranquil country
Posts: 2,037
|
Yes a Twin will break up. Depends on which era Twin. In the order of less breakup to more: Silverface master volume > Silverface non-master > post-CBS blackface > pre-CBS blackface > Tan tolex > Tweed The silverface Twins are the best match to the Rhodes as they were made during the same era. In the early 80s they made a 185 watt "Super Twin" that had ultra-linear output transformers which were really clean and really loud. Bet that was popular during the balls-to-the-walls heavy metal overdrive days ![]() My personal favorite Rhodes amp is my "croc-skin" Selmer Twin Thirty. It's thirty watts used only for recording but really unique sound, really cleans up the mud and creates a nice dynamic timbre that is controllable from your fingers.
__________________ You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink it. But lead a horse to liquor... |
| | |
| | #19 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2010 Location: Orlando
Posts: 1,503
| Quote:
__________________ http://soundcloud.com/apollo-soul/hypnotized-sample-c2011 A quick taste. Thanks for all the help guys. Album drops and site goes live in 2012. PM me with email if you want release announcement. | |
| | |
| | #20 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2010 Location: Orlando
Posts: 1,503
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Voiding warranties Joined: Feb 2004 Location: beautiful Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 10,081
|
In the 1980's we recorded Stevie Wonder's modified Rhodes through 2 twin reverbs with JBL's. Hear them on all those records. They are also recorded direct, via the RCA jack on the harp. Use a 1 meg ohm input impedance DI and it sounds great. Use a very short cable. |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2002 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,167
|
I was bad, but I played keys with a band for a while, and both my Rhodes and my Wurli sounded great with a silverface Twin. And the Twin into a closed cab, either Fender or Marshall, was even better. I never tried it, but I would think a Rhodes at gig volume would blow a Deluxe to bits. |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Gear addict Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 349
|
What you need is a Twin Custom 15. It's a Twin Reverb with a single 15" speaker instead of 2x12". A lot more appropriate for amplifying a Rhodes IMO.
|
| | |
| | #24 |
| Gear interested Joined: Nov 2011 Location: Delaware
Posts: 2
| Twin and Bassman
I have both a twin and a bassman available, d.g.bowen@comcast.net. Im in the midatlantic
|
| | |
| | #25 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 345
|
I have a buddy with a Rhodes and he actually prefers playing through solid state amps. He finds a lot of guitar amps seem to colour the Rhodes sound a little too much for his liking. Prefers something a little more transparent, and less coloured.
|
| | |
| | #26 |
| Lives for gear |
The thing that Fenders don't do well is bass. The speakers were mostly underspec'd for the bass extension the amp could put out, so you have to turn it down or gets "flubby". Bottom line, even at quiet levels a Deluxe Reverb is going to sound bass shy. The Twin is better and has big enough transformers to "hit" the notes harder as well. Even better a Twin with JBLs or Altec Lansings. Even better (as mentioned) a Dual Showman with a sealed cab with 2 JBLs. And sure you can overdrive a Twin. All BF/SF Fender start to overdrive about the same place on the volume dial, they just do it at different overall volume levels (with the exception of the Bandmaster and the Tremolux which just don't have high enough plate voltages to overdrive till higher on the dial).
|
| | |
| | #27 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2008 Location: secluded tranquil country
Posts: 2,037
| Quote:
I bridge the two channels and use the pushbutton tone switches to bring out the bell tone and remove the mud. The top end is really clear, those EF86s are nice on a Rhodes. Because it has a tube rectifier, it gets punchy when you slam the Rhodes. Combine that with the mild tube midrange overdrive and you have nice control of timbre through your fingers. mp3 sample of that setup (it's an older recording, the hiss in the piano since has been fixed) | |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2010 Location: North Carolina
Posts: 502
|
The amp included with the Rhoades was a version of the Showman. And the Cabinet had 2 15" speakers. |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Gear maniac |
If you're looking for clean sound Roland Jazz Chorus can do the job. But I love Twin Reverb with Rhodes. Cheers.
|
| | |
| | #30 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2008 Location: secluded tranquil country
Posts: 2,037
| |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Twin or Deluxe reverb? | Manyrains | instruments, guitar, bass, amps | 29 | 17th October 2009 10:03 PM |
| Fender Twin Reverb '65 vs. Blues Deluxe | antoine2055 | So much gear, so little time! | 12 | 6th August 2008 06:35 AM |
| Fender Twin Reverb (1971) Reverb noise/Power tube recommedations? | wthiessen | Geekslutz forum | 6 | 27th January 2007 05:19 PM |
| Fender Twin Reverb (1971) Reverb noise/Power tube recommedations? | wthiessen | Geekslutz forum | 0 | 24th January 2007 08:31 PM |
| |