All Advertisers
| All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
 New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
27th October 2008
| #1 |
| Lives for gear  Joined: Jul 2006 Location: GAINESVILLE FLORIDA
Posts: 1,358
Thread Starter | Tracking &Mixing 96k verses 44k?
Hello there. I have been recording at 44k 24 bit on a pro tools HD2 192 system for a few years now. If I was not bouncing to a cd would I hear much difference in this. Let's say I record my blues band 96k and mix to a 96k master. Then I have the band do another take and record it at 44k and mixdown to a 44k master. Do you think I would hear much of a difference between the two recordings? Glenn. |
|  |
New Reply 
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Random Post: 44k > 48k > 44k | dan98 | Mastering forum | 5 | 25th September 2007 03:26 PM |
| Recording 96k & Mixing in 44.1 | obsestric | Music computers | 9 | 29th November 2006 02:25 AM |
| Tracking & Mixing | lavant77 | Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production | 7 | 27th November 2006 11:22 PM |
| 96k to 44k or 88 to 44k | pingu | High end | 8 | 26th June 2006 03:36 PM |
| B&W 805's or Dynaudio BM6's for tracking & mixing rock | bobby yarrow | So much gear, so little time! | 9 | 16th January 2005 03:24 AM |
| |
