![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Electric Guitar Mic .... yet again | Renegade Prod | So much gear, so little time! | 6 | 16th May 2008 04:13 AM |
| Mic Pres for Electric Guitar | celulazul | Low End Theory | 10 | 2nd February 2008 09:07 PM |
| Recording Electric Guitar. Where to turn when R-121, 421, 57 aren't cutting it. | Diegel | So much gear, so little time! | 79 | 1st February 2008 01:57 AM |
| Senn 421 or other for guitar amp mic | feyshay | So much gear, so little time! | 9 | 21st March 2007 07:03 PM |
| AT4050 as electric guitar mic? | geizo94 | Low End Theory | 7 | 7th March 2007 02:42 AM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #31 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: UK
Posts: 248
| Sorry, but +1 for the 57/sm7 again. The MD421 does have a large peak in the upper mids, and I too like it on clean(er) stuff, I actually find the MKII to be a little harder, but this could be due to some ageing factors in the older model mics. But the 57 and sm7 IMHO make a great compliment for it - the 57 has a certain way of capturing the throat and grind of overdriven sounds and the sm7 is similar but with extra top and bottom. I sometimes use the 421 or M88 at the cone edge to mainly dial-in some extra lows, whilst trying not to swamp the throaty qualities of the 57 (I rarely use it on the dustcap). IME, The amp has to be loud enough though, feed a 57 too little volume and it's as thin as heck - and that speaker compression will not be helping to tame any clipping-fizz from the amp section. Not to say the ribbons can't be great, I use them too (M160 mainly). Note that close mic'ing (alone) is not the way to capture the amps "in the room" sound, it's a "compromise" that has it's own pro's and con's, so I'd also be looking at changing the amps settings to work with the close mic setup, rather than sound impressive 6' away in a room, if it wasn't already. |
| | |
| | #32 |
| Lives for gear | In my experience, mixing different polar patterns on a single source(i.e. one cardioid and one fig.-8) helps avoiding phase-related headaches when blending signals. Doesn't really matter if they're both close mics or not, either. Can't tell if there's a scientific foundation to this, or if I'm just lucky with mic placement, though.
__________________ André ________________________________________ "keep it simple. get it right in tracking. record good drummers in good rooms. cake." mixman499 "no room, no boom!" Michael Wagener "every song is different." Dave Pensado "God dammit man! Just try! The best way to micing is the way that u will like!!!"mat1306 |
| | |
| | #33 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 890
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #34 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20
| another vote for the sm 7. its just a great mic. i have used the e906 and the audix i5 for guitars, and i find the sm 7 to be superior to both. |
| | |
| | #35 |
| Gear interested | |
| | |
| | #36 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: New York City
Posts: 235
| Oh boy! I've got my friend's Fathead II positioned just right, and my 57 along with it, and it sure sounds sweet. Clean tones, edge of distortion, crunchy fat... all sound pretty great with this same configuration. When I listen back to the recorded tracks, I really like the 421 less and less... Blended with the Fathead is great, but on its own, contrasted with the 57 or Fathead solo'd, I don't like it. Just to be clear - I'm not trying to knock the 421 in general - only how it's working with my own particular set-up. OK, you guys are totally right- a ribbon is what I wanted. I am ordering a Fathead tomorrow. And then maybe a Heil dynamic, for extra fun and versatility. The 421 is probably going back... And I'll build myself a little mini-trap to place behind the Fathead, thanks for the tip Einar. Thanks, everyone. |
| | |
| | #37 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: East Bay, Ca
Posts: 333
| ideally, i would say r-121, as the 421 121 combo is my go-to guit setup. however, the re20, the e609 and the heil pr30 are all stellar choices. i dont think you'd be upset with any of them.
__________________ Brad Dollar Lead Engineer, Bay Area Sound Studios Rehearse, Track, Mix, Master! http://bayareasoundstudios.com |
| | |
| | #38 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: East Bay, Ca
Posts: 333
| oh, and never forget the 57. it really is a great guitar mic.
__________________ Brad Dollar Lead Engineer, Bay Area Sound Studios Rehearse, Track, Mix, Master! http://bayareasoundstudios.com |
| | |
| | #39 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 751
| I use a 57 and an EV PL 10 on my guitar cabs. The PL 10 has a darker sound the I put underneath the 57. Works for me. |
| | |
| | #40 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: South East England
Posts: 852
| Another vote for a ribbon !! Royer if you can afford it. James
__________________ http://www.jamesmuir.org My personal site http://www.makemorenoise.org Free Logic video tutorials |
| | |
| | #41 | |
| Gear addict Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 387
| Quote:
Northern Sound & Light (NSL) - Call Us 866-796-6232 for great prices on all AT mics. I bought a pair of 4047s from them, for around $420 ea., IIRC. More like $446 ea. now... Last edited by digibird; 9th October 2008 at 09:42 AM.. Reason: price change | |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |