A-D Apogee VS Lynx VS SSL VS Digi 192 - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!

A-D Apogee VS Lynx VS SSL VS Digi 192
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 21st September 2008   #1
Lives for gear
 
T_R_S's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Canuk
Posts: 5,702

Thread Starter
A-D Apogee VS Lynx VS SSL VS Digi 192

Ok I have added the SSL Alphalink (this is my winner) to the test ...

The other converters are Lynx Aurora, Digi 192, Apogee AD-16X, Rosetta 800
There are 5 sets of zipped files to download. For those who saw the old teats all you need to do is download the new file (contains the SSL along with the new PT session)

LINK 2

LINK 1
__________________
FB Page

==========

SURPLUS GEAR SALE
T_R_S is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2008   #2
Gear nut
 
myrtlebacker's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 133

468 MB ? I think I will pass.
myrtlebacker is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2008   #3
Lives for gear
 
dangoudie's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: London
Posts: 603

I prefer 20-something teats
dangoudie is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2008   #4
Lives for gear
 
T_R_S's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Canuk
Posts: 5,702

Thread Starter
All the 5 files are about 2GB in total. The idea is show what the convertors sound like against each other with very different music styles with full clips not just 20 seconds of one type of music.
T_R_S is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th January 2009   #5
Gear Head
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 45

Hi guys,

I've been listening to these tests, because I've decided to upgrade converters from my dfegadMotu rig...

I found the SSL to be very neutral, but also a little less bright on the highs, when clocked internally. Clocked externally it seems a bit brighter, but not revealing.

The apogees AD16x definitely colour the sound, but in a good 3 dimensional way... Pleasant to the ears. (I Like it specially on the "oldman blues" for that).

The Rosetta sounds a bit smaller compared to all the others... seems to have been recorded at a lower level? But the overall sound is thinner, when compared to the others.

The Digi192 sounded ok, but makes you miss the apogee kind of 3D...

Seems to me that the Lynx sounds the most equal to the source recorded. No hyped but accurate highs and mids. Tight Lows. Very neutral.

Following my instincts and having heard this test-files (by the way, I can not thank you enough, for the work doing this! It's the only test I've found on theese converters!!)

I conclude:

Digi192: Not worth the money. A bit sterile...
Lynx: Very nice. And for 16 ad+ 16 da it's a good deal!
Rosetta: Not worth the money.
Apogee AD16X: Sounds great, coloured, but very pleasant (almost like tape!). A bit overpriced for only 16 AD's...
SSL Alpha-Link: My next choice right after the Lynx Aurora. Tempting... the price is AMAZING for 24 AD + 24 DA and the Madi connectivity. Definitely de best deal!

So as you can see, I'm pretty much decided to go either the Lynx or the SSL way. I think the apogee, would be a nice add to my rig, just to have the choice of giving it a bit of that really nice Colour...
Well, but I guess I'll leave that better for the Mastering engineers....

I would really like to hear some more opinions about this tests, from you all... just to compare.

Thanks again, and hope to hear from you all soon...

Toni
Crashdown is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th January 2009   #6
Gear nut
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: berlin
Posts: 129

downloading now... thanks a lot for doing this!
zodiaque is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2009   #7
Lives for gear
 
dudleys100's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Idaho
Posts: 548

This is GREAT, thank you!!! I LOVE my SSL's
dudleys100 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2009   #8
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Toluca Lake, CA
Posts: 1,289

I much prefer the SSL Alpha-Link as well. I tested the Aurora 16 and 192 along side the SSL, and the SSL took it home. I didn't like the bottom end on the Aurora or the mid and high end on the 192.

The SSL was definitely the clear winner.
__________________
Dean

www.deanlandon.com
aka Imagine
Dean Landon is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Digi 192 vs Lynx Aurora with samplitude Fabianuy So much gear, so little time! 1 4th June 2008 03:57 AM
Apogee vs Digi 192 I/O TexasStudioC High end 19 24th January 2008 03:03 AM
Digi 192 - All this talk but does it really matter? [Lynx & Apogee users sign in] Jess Jackson High end 111 4th April 2007 01:27 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:37 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.